Chandler v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
Filing
12
ORDER: This case involves claims regarding the pharmaceutical drug Aredia (pamidronate), not Fosamax (alendronate), but was incorrectly accepted as a member case to In re Fosamax Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 1789. The Clerk is respectfully directed to cancel this association. It appears that this case should be transferred to the Middle District of Tennessee and consolidated with In re Aredia and Zometa Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 1760. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of the complaint and this order to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 9/21/2009) (jpo) [Transferred from New York Southern(incoming only) on 12/4/2009.]
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
EVAN CHANDLER,
Plaintiff. -against-
USDC SZFZ DOCUM EP;?' EEECT?-Q>-rlCi.iLL'ia
D
Order
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, APP PHARMACEUTICALS, BEN VENUE LABORATORTIES, INC.
D/B/A BEDFORD LABORATORIES, HOSPIRA, INC, AND TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, INC.
:
Defendants.
JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge:
This case involves claims regarding t h e pharmaceutical drug
Aredia (pamidronate),
not
Fosamax
(alendronate),
but
was
i n c o r r e c t l y accepted as a m e m b e r case to In re Fosamax P r o d s . Liab. Litig.,
MDL No. 1789.
The C l e r k is respectfully directed
to cancel this association.
It appears that this case should be
t r a n s f e r r e d t o the Middle D i s t r i c t of Tennessee and consolidated
with In re Aredia and Zometa Prods. L i a b .
Litig., MDL No.
1760.
The C l e r k is d i r e c t e d to forward a copy of the complaint and
this o r d e r to t h e Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
New York, New York September %i 2 0 0 9 J !
$%wJ
?&
JOHN F. KEENAN United S t a t e s D i s t r i c t Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
