Jaramillo v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2008cv02837 - Document 16 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Commissioner moves for judgment on the pleadings and plaintiff declined to respond to the motion. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants defendant's 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. There was substanti al evidence supporting the ALJ's determinations that plaintiff was not disabled because he performed substantial gainful activity and that he was not entitled to a trial work period. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 12/7/2009) C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.