Mora-Nape v. United States of America, No. 2:2021cv01123 - Document 5 (D.N.M. 2022)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), and consistent with the 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on October 31, 2022, Defendant's 1 Motion for Hardship Credit for Hard Time Served is DENIED, except that any request for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 or 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. (ve)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mora-Nape v. United States of America Doc. 5 Case 2:21-cv-01123-KWR-SMV Document 5 Filed 10/31/22 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO IRVING EDGAR MORA-NAPE, Petitioner, v. No. 2:21-cv-1123-KWR-SMV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), and consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 4) entered on October 31, 2022, the Court issues its separate judgment finally disposing of this civil case. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion for Hardship Credit for Hard Time Served (Doc. 1) is DENIED, except that any request for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 or 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
