Chavez v. Horton et al, No. 1:2019cv01151 - Document 45 (D.N.M. 2023)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and the 44 Memorandum Opinion and Order Overruling Objections and Adopting Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Dispositio n entered March 15, 2023, Mr. Chavez' 1 and 22 Petition and Supplemental Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus are DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. (ve)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Chavez v. Horton et al Doc. 45 Case 1:19-cv-01151-KWR-LF Document 45 Filed 05/15/23 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MARIO CHAVEZ, Petitioner, v. No. 1:19-cv-01151-KWR-LF VINCENT HORTON, WARDEN, and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and the Memorandum Opinion and Order Overruling Objections and Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 44) entered March 15, 2023, final judgment is entered in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner Mario Chavez. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Chavez’ Petition and Supplemental Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docs. 1, 22) are DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________ KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
