RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. ANITA NGUYEN, LLC et al
Filing
23
LETTER ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 20 Report and Recommendations, 19 Motion to Strike; thus grants Pltf's Motion to Strike and enter default. Pltf must file a motion for default judgment w/in 30 days. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 4/11/12. (sr, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
CHAMBERS OF
MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE
50 WALNUT ST.
ROOM 2037
NEWARK, NJ 07101
973-297-4887
ESTHER SALAS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
April 17, 2012
LETTER ORDER
Re:
Ramada Worldwide, Inc. v. Anita Nguyen, LLC, et al.
Civil Action No. 11-921 (ES)
Dear Counsel:
Pending before this Court is Plaintiff Ramada Worldwide, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to strike
the answer of defendants Anita Nguyen, LLC and Hong V. Nguyen (the “Defendants”) for violation
of Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and to enter default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). (the “Motion,” Docket
No. 19). Defendants did not oppose the Motion. On January 10, 2012, Magistrate Judge Cathy
Waldor issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 20) recommending that this Court
grant the Motion. Magistrate Judge Waldor advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file
and serve any objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2).
To date, Defendants have not filed any objections.
The Court has considered Plaintiff’s submission in support, as well as Judge Waldor’s Report
and Recommendation, and for the reasons stated therein,
IT IS on this 11th day of April 2012,
ORDERED that this Court adopts Judge Waldor’s January 10, 2012 Report and
Recommendation in full, and thus grants Plaintiff’s Motion to strike and enter default; and it is
further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s must file a motion for default judgment within 30 days of the date
of this order; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate Docket Entry Nos. 19 and 20.
SO ORDERED.
s/Esther Salas
Esther Salas, U.S.D.J
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?