-MAS STEELE v. PFIZER INC., et al, No. 2:1999cv01010 - Document 20 (D.N.J. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER that given the current status of the case, the Court is satisfied that the Office of Clerk of the Court for the USDC for the District of NJ should no longer be burdened by accepting, scanning, and filing submissions which have no legally cognizable purpose, and the Clerk shall accept no further filings from the Plaintiff in this matter, which is closed; etc. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 10/24/11. (sr, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CEOLA STEELE, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER INC. et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 99-1010 (SRC) OPINION & ORDER CHESLER, U.S.D.J. This matter comes before this Court following the October 14, 2011 filing by Plaintiff. Plaintiff s Complaint in this matter was dismissed with prejudice by the Hon. Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. on March 9, 1999. The docket shows numerous submissions of letters and other filings by Plaintiff since that date. None of these submissions appears to constitute a motion which might be properly considered by the Court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, such as a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b). Given the current status of the case, the Court is satisfied that the Office of the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey should no longer be burdened by accepting, scanning, and filing submissions which have no legally cognizable purpose, and the Clerk shall accept no further filings from Plaintiff in this matter, which is closed. If Plaintiff has any claim which she wishes to pursue, and which has any cognizable merit, she is directed to file a complaint in conformity with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2), which requires a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. SO ORDERED. s/ Stanley R. Chesler STANLEY R. CHESLER, U.S.D.J. Dated: October 24, 2011 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.