SPADY v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. et al, No. 1:2019cv05968 - Document 35 (D.N.J. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. Defendant Diversified Consultants, Inc., is afforded 20 days to notify the Court if it will continue in its opposition to the Motion to Stay, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 10/9/2019. (dmr)

Download PDF
SPADY v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. et al Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JOSHUA SPADY, HONORABLE NOEL L. HILLMAN Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-5968 (NLH/KMW) v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendants. APPEARANCES: BENJAMIN JARRET WOLF JOSEPH K. JONES JONES, WOLF & KAPASI, LLC 375 PASSAIC AVENUE, SUITE 100 FAIRFIELD, NJ 07004 On behalf of Plaintiff AARON RAPHAEL EASLEY ANDREW JOSHUA BLADY SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL 3682 GREEN RIDGE ROAD FURLONG, PA On behalf of Defendants HILLMAN, District Judge This case comes before the court on Plaintiff Joshua Spady’s Motion to Stay (Docket Item 10) pending the outcome of the appeal in Cadillo v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, a District of New Jersey case that held that the language at issue did not satisfy the requirement of the FDCPA. Defendant Dockets.Justia.com Diversified Consultants, Inc., which had previously filed a Motion to Dismiss (Docket Item 5) in this case, opposed Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal (Docket Item 12). The Court notes that Defendant’s opposition to the Motion to Seal was premised in large part on the argument that the Third Circuit had not yet accepted the interlocutory appeal in Cadillo. 12.) (See Docket Item In the time since Defendant filed its opposition, however, the Third Circuit has decided to consider the appeal in Cadillo and has set a briefing schedule beginning on October 18, 2019. See Cadillo v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, Appellate Docket No. 19-2811. THEREFORE, IT IS this 9th day of October 2019, hereby ORDERED that Defendant Diversified Consultants, Inc., is afforded 20 days to notify the Court if it will continue in its opposition to the Motion to Stay and, if so, the grounds for such opposition. s/Noel L. Hillman _________ NOEL L. HILLMAN United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.