MOTOLO v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
Filing
4
ORDERED that the IFP is DENIED W/OUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case, etc. To reopen Pltf shall notify the Court, in writing, w/in 30 days including a complete IFP or $350 FF. All pending applications are DENIED AS MOOT. Opinion, Order & IFP Sent to Pltf. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 9/26/2011. (drw, )n.m.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
PERRY FRANCIS MOTOLO,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil Action No. 11-4618 (RMB)
ORDER
CLOSED
For the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith,
IT IS on this 26th day of September 2011,
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall supply to
Plaintiff a blank form Application, for use by a prisoner, to
Proceed In Forma Pauperis in a Civil Rights Case; and it is
further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively
terminate this case, without filing the Complaint or assessing a
filing fee; and it is further
ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he
shall so notify the Court, in writing addressed to the Clerk of
the Court, at
Mitchell H. Cohen Building and U.S. Courthouse, Fourth
and Cooper Streets, Camden, New Jersey, 08101,
within 30 days after the date of entry of this Order; Plaintiff’s
writing shall include either (1) a complete in forma pauperis
application, including an affidavit of indigence and six-month
prison account statement, certified by the appropriate official
of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined, or
(2) the $350 filing fee; and it is further
ORDERED that all pending applications are DENIED as MOOT;
and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of
this Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.
s/Renée Marie Bumb
Renée Marie Bumb
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?