Bello-Arias v. FCI Berlin, Warden, No. 1:2023cv00079 - Document 8 (D.N.H. 2023)
Court Description: ///ORDER denying as moot 6 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, it is plain that Bello-Arias has received all the relief sought in his petition and no intervention from this court is necessary. That peti tion (document no. 1) is, therefore, dismissed as moot. Similarly, the government's motion for summary judgment (document no. 6) is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bello-Arias v. FCI Berlin, Warden Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Emmanuel Bello-Arias, Petitioner v. Case No. 23-cv-079-SM Opinion No. 2023 DNH 043 Warden, FCI Berlin, Respondent O R D E R Emmanuel Bello-Arias is a federal prisoner currently being held at the Federal Correctional Institution in Berlin, New Hampshire. He brings a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 saying the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has improperly classified him as “ineligible” to apply time credits he has earned under the First Step Act and, therefore, incorrectly calculated his projected release date. He seeks an order directing the BOP to properly account for those time credits and amend his projected release date by one year. When Bello-Arias filed his petition, his claims had merit. But, shortly thereafter, the BOP properly credited him with earned FSA time credits and advanced his projected release date by one year (the maximum permitted). Accordingly, Bello-Arias Dockets.Justia.com has received all of the relief he sought and his petition is now moot. Discussion There are two ways by which inmates serving federallyimposed sentences may reduce the amount of time they must serve in prison. Those serving a term of imprisonment greater than one year may earn “good time” credits for “exemplary compliance with institutional disciplinary regulations.” 3624(b)(1). 18 U.S.C. § Inmates may also earn “time credits” under the First Step Act for the successful completion of “evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.” 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A). This case involves the latter. Bello-Arias is currently serving a 106-month term of imprisonment, to be followed by a five-year term of supervised release. He is the subject of an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) detainer that was lodged against him in May of 2022. With the benefit of good time credits, his “Final Statutory Release Date” is July 20, 2027. See Sentence Monitoring Computation Data (document no. 6-3) at 1. not dispute that calculation. 2 He does In addition to good time credit, Bello-Arias has also earned a number of FSA time credits, 365 of which that may be applied toward early transfer to supervised release. See FSA Time Credit Assessment as of March 25, 2023 (document no. 6-4) at 1. See also 18 U.S.C.A. § 3624(g)(3) (providing that the BOP may apply no more than 12 months of earned FSA time credits to advance an inmate’s date of transfer to supervised release). So, factoring in both his good time credits and his FSA time credits, Bello-Arias’s “Projected Release Date” should be July 20, 2026 – that is, 365 days earlier than his “Final Statutory Release Date.” But, says Bello-Arias, the BOP is refusing to apply those FSA time credits and, therefore, his projected release date is one year later than it should be. According to Bello-Arias, the BOP improperly listed him as “ineligible” to apply his earned FSA time credits toward an early transfer to prerelease custody or supervised release because of the presence of the ICE detainer against him. The FSA Time Credit Assessment attached to his petition and dated January 14, 2023 (document no. 1-1) appears to support that claim. The government has not attempted to explain why the BOP had been reporting that Bello-Arias was “ineligible” to apply FSA time credits toward early release. But, it is likely because the BOP had been operating under the mistaken impression 3 that the existence of an ICE detainer precluded an inmate from applying earned FSA time credits toward an early release to prerelease custody or supervised release. See U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Program Statement 5410.10, § 10(b) at 13 (Nov. 11, 2022) (“While inmates with unresolved pending charges and/or detainers may earn FTCs, if otherwise eligible, they will be unable to apply them to prerelease custody or release to supervision unless the charges and/or detainers are resolved.”) (emphasis supplied) (available at https://www.bop.gov/policy /progstat/5410_01.pdf). That BOP policy seems to have been inconsistent with the language of the FSA itself, which only precludes those prisoners with “final orders of removal” from applying earned FSA time credits toward prerelease custody or supervised release; the FSA does not speak to prisoners who are subject only to a detainer. See 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(E)(i). See also Komando v. Luna, No. 22-CV-425-SE, 2023 WL 310580, at *6 (D.N.H. Jan. 13, 2023), report and recommendation approved sub nom. Komando v. FCI Berlin, Warden, No. 22-CV-425-SE, 2023 WL 1782034 (D.N.H. Feb. 6, 2023) (“This court, and the BOP, must give effect to the plain language of the statute that was enacted. Potentially removable noncitizens who are not the subject of final orders of removal are not within the scope of subparagraph (E)(i).”). 4 Seemingly recognizing its error, on February 6, 2023, the BOP amended its procedures for implementing the FSA. Among other things, it removed language in the prior policy that prohibited prisoners subject to ICE detainers from applying FSA time credits. See U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Program Statement 5410.10 CN-1 at 2 (Feb. 6, 2023) (available at: https://www.bop.gov/PublicInfo/execute/policysearch?todo= query&series=5000). Subsequently, Bello-Arias’s Sentence Monitoring Computation Data was recalculated. According to documents attached to the government’s legal memorandum, BelloArias is now eligible both to earn and to apply FSA time credits. See generally Gonzalez-Garcia v. Warden, FCI Belin, No. 23-cv-019, 2023 DNH 040 at 5 (D.N.H. April 20, 2023) (noting that, based upon their underlying crimes of conviction, certain inmates are not eligible to receive FSA time credits. Other inmates are not eligible to apply FSA time credits toward prerelease custody or supervised release.) (citing 18 U.S.C. §§ 3632(d)(4)(D) and 3632(d)(4)(E)(i)). In short, then, when Bello-Arias filed his petition, the BOP had improperly determined that he was not eligible to apply earned FSA time credits toward an early transfer to prerelease custody or supervised release. But, since then, the BOP has amended its policy and corrected Bello-Arias’s records. 5 Those records now correctly show that he is eligible to apply earned FSA time credits toward early release. See FSA Time Credit Assessment dated March 25, 2023, at 1. They also now properly account for Bello-Arias’s earned FSA time credits and show that his “projected release date” is July 20, 2026 (rather than July 20, 2027). See Sentence Monitoring Computation Data at 1. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, it is plain that Bello-Arias has received all the relief sought in his petition and no intervention from this court is necessary. That petition (document no. 1) is, therefore, dismissed as moot. Similarly, the government’s motion for summary judgment (document no. 6) is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge April 21, 2023 cc: Emmanuel Bello-Arias, pro se Heather A. Cherniske, Esq. 6
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
