MPower Systems India (Pvt) Ltd. et al v. Articmaster Inc., No. 3:2016cv00558 - Document 55 (D. Nev. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING Corrected Verified Petition (ECF No. 54 ) for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Christopher Dobbins for ArticMaster Inc. approving Designation of Local Counsel. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/15/2019. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MPower Systems India (Pvt) Ltd. et al v. Articmaster Inc. Doc. 55 3 A T 5 UNTT$} STATBS DI.STR,ICT COLTRT I}ISTRICT CI}T NSVADA 6 7 8 MPr:wer Systems India (PVT) LTD., et al., ) Clasc #3:16-CV-00558 CORRECTED - a) VIiRIlrlf It, D F$TITI0I'{ FOR PERMISSIOI.{'I'O PRACTICE Ii\ THIS CASA ONI"Y BY ATTORNS}i I.IOT AI}MITTEO 'r'o Tl{t: r]AR o]']'HIS COUI{T Ai\D DESIC;NATIT}N OT LOCAI, TJOTJNSN[, Plaintiffls), v$, ArticMaeter, Inc l2 l-1 Dc l'endant(s). FILtrNG FET IS t4 Ohristopher l{] {nanrc l/ eit' Dobbins _, petitioner, resFrectfrlly represeiits to the Court: petitioiler} 'I"hat Pctitioner is an attorney at larv and a tnembcr of the law finn l. l8 of Law Offices of Christopher Dobbins (lirnr name) Itl 30 $25O.OO P.O. Box 5218 ivifh offices at (street address) 21 s1 -6ffiroae ''A ?. ?5 26 27 l,f5 {state) (cryl t2 i-) California Oakland 0-562-2506 + ielepiilne chrisdobbinslaw@yaho0. com nurrr6Et-- ldi;AiiCd,Jffii That Fetitioner has been retained personally or ArticMaster, tztp code} Inc. &s a *tember of the la'w finn by to provide legal representstion in connection with fclient(s)l {he above-$nfitled cfise no}r' pen<ling brt:lbre fhis Court Rev.5ll6 Dockets.Justia.com I t I "( That since l, lUUu December UecemDer 1, 2008 tisner h*s been and presently is a , Petiti (date) member in gaod standing of the bar of the highesr Clorut of the Stare of C_difornig tstats) where Petitioner regulaily practices lar,v. Petitioner shall attach a cefiificate fi'onr the slate bal'or / + fronr the clerk of thc supremc coufi or highest admitting court of cach state, territory, or insular J possession of the LJnited States in which the applicant has been ac|nitted to practice iaw certifying (r thc applicant's rnernbersirip therein is in good standing. 1 4. That Petitioner was aclnitted to practice bcfore the following United States District Coufis, United States Circr"rit Courts of Appeal, the Suprerlc Court of the Unitcd States and Courts of other Statcs on the datcs indicated lbr each, and that Pctitioncr is prescntly a membcr in good l0 standins of*the bars of said Coutts. ll Corirt l1 LL US Oistrict Court NarCal Date Adrnitted 6/18t2018 Bar Number 258002 l- l_1 14 It) tl l8 l9 20 a1 LI 5. That there are or have been no disciplinary proceedings instituted against petitioner, nor any suspension af any license, certificate or priviiege to appear bef'ore any judicial, regulatory or administrative body, or any resignalion or termination in order to avoid disciplinaly or LL 1a !) 1A LA 26 di:;banncnt proceedings, except as dcscribed in detail below: "none" tf Petrtroner nas no dtscrplrnary 2014, but the suspension was stayed and this attorney was placed on probation for one year, ordered to pay a fine, and the MPR!. This attorney successfully successfully retook and passed the MPRE, successfully completed and is paying offthe fine.See State Bar Court of California Case Nos. 11-0-14777,11-0-14778. ln a2011 criminal trial in Santa Clara County, the trialjudge found this attorney violated CA Business & Professions Codes 6103 and 6068(o). The opinion was appealed and the results were as stated above. The events occurred earlv in this attornev's careerand since, this attorney has had over 10 trialswithout incident. zl )x Rev.5116 6. I 2 That Petitioner has never been denied adnrission to the State Bar of Nevada. (Give pa$iculars if ever denied admission): 3 q 5 That Petitioner is a nrember of good standing in the following Bar Associations" 6 7 of Alameda County Bar Association R C) 8. l0 tlt! {i'ornr*rly LR 1n Date of Petitioner lras filed application{s) to appear as counsel under Local Rule lA l0-?) during the past three (3) years in the following matters: Applicution Cause l3 {State "none" Title of Court Administrative Eody or ii IA I l-2 no applications.) Was Application Arbitrator $ranted or Dsnted None L4 l5 t6 lt l8 l9 20 {lf 9. necessary, please attach a statement o1'additional applications) Petitioner oon$ents to the jurisdiction of the courts and disciplinary boards otlthe .!, I State of Nevada with respect to the law of this state govsming the cor:duct of att*:n:eys to the same 1'l ext*fit as a member of the State B.ar of Nevada, L) .A 75 26 t 0. Petitioner egrees to comply with the standards of professional conduct required of the menrbers of the Lrar of this cclurt. I L Petitioner: has rlisciosed in writing to the client that the applicant is nst admittsd to practice in this jurisdiction arrd that the client has consented to sr:ch representation. 27 28 Rev.5i l6 I 1 L That Petitioner respecffully prays that Petitior:er be adrniftqd to practice before this Court EOR THH PURPOSITS OF THIS CASE ON a 4 STATE CrF California I I COUNTY OF Alameda ) 6 Christopher 7 Dobbins I I That the foregoir"tg statements arc true. t0 Subscrihed atrd sworn to befsre me this ll l? d {- day of* -.ruy"r--:l'Pil first duly , Petiti -- , deposes and says: _2p11__ IJ 7A la t5 l6 11 ril DESIGNATION OF RBSIDENT ATTORNEY ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF TIIIS COURT AND CONSENT THERETO. Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Rules of Practice for this Cou*, the Petitioner believes it to be jn the best jntere.sts of the client(s) fo r9 20 designate Nic!*las A' -Uritf . (name of local counsel) Attorney at Law, msmber of the State of Nevada and previously adrnitted to practice before the above,entitled Court as associate resident counsel in this action. The address and email address of 21 said designatecl Nevada counsel is: 22 P.O. Box 371 l,-) (street address) 24 25 ./.\) 28 . La Puente (city) California (state) . . --, 626-41s-3600. farea codt* teieltfiotle ntm6ert ryri9l9nig[uf:klalvrcom(Email addless) " 91747 -.G$ffie)-. Rev. iil6 I By this designation rhc pelitianer arrd undersigned pany(ier) agrr:r thlrr this de*ignatinn con*titutes agleemenl and autlrorizalisn ltlr rhc desrgnared re,side nt aclnritted uounsel ro sign stipuloricins binding ol all of us. 4 A fI POINTiIISNT OF DES IC NA I"SD RES.IOENT N SVADII CSUN$ET. 6 The undervigned p*lty(ie3) apsoinl(s) I h "- Nickolas A, Urick iirarnc offiAi:cotrllssll isrhcr/thcir Designated Resident Nevada Counsel in this casc. o t0 s il lgnalure : rvater-crpn" .frcs,rA"e':r+, trllc) {rytlc o| pnnr piirtv nilrnc, l2 -A5Ls"S{*r J*A L. ,J {panY's signature) l4 t5 tttpeEr t6 t? CONSEI{T (}r f[]t parl-\,nans. tir'i$ BESlcn'Etr The u*dcrsigncd hercby con$ents to $er.,c ts ass, sidcnt Ncvada counscl in this case, t8 t9 20 hr[niii,:<l il 9925 nurrck@nickuricklaw.corn llar nrrnrbcr Etnail addre*s 1') t{ Ni'' ntr-f<r{rn$eK;i[nmre 73 APPRf)VED: {..t Oarcd: tlris 15th day of'**,.-July 2019 ZJ ?6 28 f ffi "f Tll4TESlTliTff eflTDEL:*** Rev J,'i6 THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 180 TELEPHONE: 888-800-3400 HOWAI\D STREET. SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORN-IA 94105-1617 CERTIFICATE OF STAN DING May 6, 2019 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to certify that according to the records of the state Bar, cHRISToPHER PHtLLtP DOBBINS, #258002 was admitted to the practjce of law in this state by the Supreme Court of California on December L, 2008; that said public record states that information has been provi'ded pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 6086.1(c); that on July !2, ZOLL, a notice of disciplinary charges directed to the licensee was issued to commence formal disciplinary proceedings and hearings; that on May 29, 2A!4, he was placed on a one year probation by the State Bar of California; and that he has been since the date of admission, and is at date hereof, an ACTIVE licensee of the State Bar of California. THE STATE BAR OF CALI.FORNIA ri A{r Denise Velasco Custodian of Records
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
