Cox v. Palmer et al
Filing
90
ORDER denying 78 Motion for clarification. The court's orders 69 & 70 are clear on their face and remain in full force and effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 02/14/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVE MICHAEL COX,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JACK PALMER, et al.,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
______________________________)
PRESENT:
3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
February 14, 2013
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
LISA MANN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Plaintiff’s motion for clarification of court orders #69 & #70 (#78) is DENIED. The
court’s orders #69 & #70 are clear on their face and remain in full force and effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
