Cox v. Palmer et al
Filing
89
ORDER denying 77 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions re Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 02/14/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVE MICHAEL COX,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JACK PALMER, et al.,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
______________________________)
PRESENT:
3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
February 14, 2013
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
LISA MANN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions (#77). Defendants opposed
the motion (#83), and plaintiff replied (#87). Plaintiff’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions (#77) is
without merit and is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
