Marvik v. Neigbors et al
Filing
61
ORDER DENYING without prejudice P's # 57 Motion dispute and strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 2/26/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVEN T. MARVIK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DR. NEIGBORS, et.al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00655-LRH-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
February 26, 2013
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Plaintiff’s “Motion to Dispute and Strike Defendant(s) Claim(s) to Grant
Any Relief of Anyway Whatsoever Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 7(a)(3),
Rule 13 and Any Case Law(s) Thereof et.al. Defendants Can’t Legally Ask For Any Relief When
This Court Determined the Legality of this Case Not Plaintiff, so Defendant(s) Only Relief Would
Have to be Brought Against this Honorable Court and not the Plaintiff et.al.” (Doc. # 57.)
Try as it might, the court is unable to understand what Plaintiff is saying in the motion and
what relief is sought. The document is simply incomprehensible.
Plaintiff’s “motion to dispute and strike” (Doc. # 57) is DENIED without prejudice to
Plaintiff filing a Motion that can be understood by the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
