Pratt v. Cox et al
Filing
33
ORDER adopting and accepting 31 Report and Recommendation, granting 19 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment, and denying 26 Plaintiff's Cross-MOTION for Summary Judgment. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/25/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
JACOB R. PRATT,
6
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
JAMES COX, et al.,
9
Defendant.
10
*****
)
)
)
)
3:11-CV-00604-RCJ-WGC
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
11
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
12
(ECF #31) entered on December 19, 2012, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court
13
enter an order granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #19) and denying Plaintiff’s
14
Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #26).
15
memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and
16
determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and
17
good cause appearing, the court hereby
18
19
20
21
22
The Court has considered the pleadings and
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge (ECF #31).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #19)
is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
23
#26) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED this 25TH day of February, 2013.
25
26
_______________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
