-RAM Beall v. State Of Nevada, No. 3:2011cv00101 - Document 8 (D. Nev. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING # 1 Application to proceed in forma pauperis. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall file the petition and that the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice as a successive petition. ( Copy of filed petition mailed to P 2/25/2011) FURTHER ORD a cert ificate of appealability is DENIED. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall make informal E-service upon Rs. ( E-service of Order and Petition performed 2/25/2011 ) No response is required from Rs, other than to respond to any orders directed to Rs by a reviewing court. Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/25/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
w . v ' . i FtERE' ,E) .( Ei , I . a':E ti'g sf / S ' E '' E f. n g j gg/ A ! r( yzty l rt j g ql( ) j l g N t r ! i ! gj FE8 2 g z j l 2 OL FCU 011 i1C2i E F S S 8: t l (lj j,(gjwAjj j ggy ; j g s j 3 EY 3: jkgtrï ; - 4 5 i : : U NITED STA TES D ISTR I C O URT CT DI STRICT O F NEVA DA 6 7 8 RONA LD W AYN E BEA LL, ; 9 31 I C OOI - 1 - V- OIRCJRAM 7 ; Pe ii er tton , 10 vs. l1 12 ' STATE O F NEVA DA , i 1 3 ORDER Re pon nt s de . 14 I : 1 5 Thstan f r ha ea mat un r28 U. C. 22 4 c me beor t e Cour on i r sered b s t de er S. 5 5 o s f e h t 1 p tine ' a l a i ( t p oc d i f mapau r an f iial e iw un erRul 4 6 e io rs ppi t #1)o r ee n or t c on pe i d or nt r ve d s i e l oft Rul Gover ng Sect 2254 Cases.The Cour fnds t t pett 7 he es ni i on t i hat he ii oneri unabl t s eo 1 nav t fl '' f and t naunerannl i t ef e wi be nr ed, 8 ' '' he i nn ee, i '' he . ' caton her or l ''' ant l ' ' . i i -RAM Beall v. State Of Nevada 1 9 $ Tur ng t i tal evi , he pr ni o nii r ew t esentpetton cl l i a s essve petton. Pettoner i i eary s ucc i ii i i Doc. 8 20 hasfl a num berofs successi i ed uch vepett r ions ecenty.The pr entsuc i l es cessi petton w as ve i i 2l fl i tal i t East n Di rc ofCal or a aferpettons i t s Cour wer di ised as i ni l n he ed i y er stit i ni t f ii n hi t e sm s ë 22 successi Gi pettoners cl l fiol r iie flngs ofi sput y successve ve. ven i i ' eary rv ous epet v i t i ndi abl i i ! 23 pettonst f t on si e al have been tme- r t Coudwi di i he pr ii hat urherl g nc so i bared, he l sm sst l esent E 24 pett wihoutf ii on t udherpr oceedi ngs. 25 By t pr he esentpetton,Ronal W ayne Bealseeks t chal ii d l o l enge hi Aprl1 1992, s i 0, 26 Nevadast econvi i pur at ct on, suantt aj yver c, fr degr mur .Pettoners o ur ditof ist ee der ii ought 27 t set det samej o asi he udgment convi i i amongot of cton n, hercases, 3: cv00597No. 06- LRH28 IAM . The Cour di s t pet i as untmel on Aprl9,2007. R t smised hat ion t i y i i E 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 * i i ! ! i . ! ! l Si et ti p ion h c t ue t fep t i ss ekngt c al n h s nc ha t me, eti er as oni d o i e ion e i o h l get e ame t n l t e 2 c ci onviton. Forex pl t Cour r am e, he t ecenty di i l sm ssed t such pettons as,i er al wo ii nt i a, . j 3 succ ve,i 3: c 0O706essi n 10- vLRHVPC and 2: c 00189- P10- vPM RJJ, 4 Pet i i oner has notatached a c t t opy ofan or f om t Ni h Cic taut i ng t der r he nt r ui horzi he 5 fl ofa s ond orsuccessi pett , and t onl dock r or oft Ni h Cicui ing i ec ve ii on he i ne et ec ds he nt r tdo ! 6 notr l tt suc an or has been i ued. efec hat h der ss ; 7 i 8 sec i 225 'm us be di i ton 4, t sm ssed i iwas pr ft esent i a prorpetton, ed n i ii , and,i t cl m w as f he ai ii t 9 notpr esent i t prorpetton, im aybe consi ed onl i t cicumst ed n he i der y n he r ancesdel i ed neat i ! : 5 ! ! ' . Under28 U. C. 2244( ( & ( ,acl m i au S. j b)1) 2) ai n secondors uccessvepettonunder i ii 1 i j 2 44( )2 .Un 28U. C. 2 44 b)3)A) b f e as on or u c s ie p t i i 0 n 2 b ( ) der S. j 2 ( ( ( , e or ec d s c e sv e ion s t 11 fl i t di rct c t t applcant m ust m ove i t cour of Appeal f an or i n he sti our , he ed n he t s or der i 1 aut i ng t di t i cour t consi t petton. Di i ofa prorf 2 horzi he s rct to der he ii sm ssal i eder pet i as al i on t 1 untm el r 3 i y ender subsequentf s eder pettons chal al ii l ng t sam e c engi he onvi ton second or ci t : 1 successi pett 4 ve ii Mc ons. Nabb ? Yat 576 F. 1028 ( Ci,2009) ' esb . 3d 9 r . l 5 The pr tpetton t ef e wi be di ssed wihoutprj ce as a successi esen i her or l i l smi t eudi ve 1 petton z Furherpr 6 ii t oceedi her n woul be f i i advanc ofenty ofj ngs ei d utl n e e r udgment as , , 1 pettoners contnued r ii fl of suc si pettons const ut f i ous and 7 i i ' i epettve i ng i ces ve i i i es rvol t ; ! 1 vexatous I i i act t 8 i i gaton i y. t vi 1 9 I THEREFORE I ORDERED tatp t i e ' a l a i ( t p o ee i f ma T s h e ion rs ppi t #1) o r c d n or t c on 2 paupers i GRANTED such t pettonershalnotbe r r t pay t fl f . 0 i s hat ii l equied o he ing ee i 21 I FURTHER I ORDERED t t Cl kofCour shalfl t petton and t t T S hat he er t l ie he ii hat he 2 p t i s lb DI SSED wi o tprj dieasa s c es ie p ti . 2 e ion hal e SMI t t u eu c h u c sv e ion t I i 23 i i 24 i ! 25 //// ! ii pet oneri addion r t n t ecent has fl d habeas pettons seekl t chal i l y i e ii ng o l enge t s conviton i t hi c i n he 26 f l ng act ol owi i ons: 2: c 02307- PAL, 1Q- 00569- RAM,and 3: c 0057009- vKJD3: cvRCJ10- vRCJRAM. 27 ' hi her n i plest t petton ot wi i feeofdefci es. I ural peti hasnol Not ng ei m i hat he ii her se s r i enci nt / a, ioner t n dapop rr p n n, and t St e ofNevada m ay nolbe sued i f alcour,regar ess oft ame r e es o de t he at n eder t dl he 28 r ifsought The petton f t cl l I untm el byw el overa decade. el e i urher eary s i y i l . . 2E i . ' l 1 ; . . . e ! i 1 i ; ; ï 1 I FURTHER I ORDERED t a ceriiat ofappeal ly i DENI T S hat tc e f abit s i ED. Jurst of is ; 2 r eason woul notfnd i debat e whet t di rct d i t abl her he sti cour i cor ecti i pr edur r i t s r n t oc s al ul ng. i 1 ë 3 r 5 addi Ator Gener Cat i Codez Mas o as counsel orr ng t ney al herne t f espondent and diectng s r i I FU RTH ER I O R DERED t , pur T s hat suantt Rul 4 oft Rul Gpver ng Secton o e he es ni i 4 2254 Cases, t Cl k ofCour shalmak i or el toni ser i upon r he er t l e nf mal ec r c vce espondent by s : i q : 6 a notc ofel toni flngt her f No r ie ec r c i o ofi i ce. esponse i r s equied fom r r r espondent ot s, her 7 t han t r o espond t any or s diect t r o der r ed o espondent by a r ew i cour . s evi ng t : 8 The Cl kofCour shalent fnaludgmen accor ngl i f ofr er t l er i j t di y,n avor espondent and s 9 agai pettoner di ssng t saci wi pr udi nst ii , smi i hi ton t hout ej ce. ( 1 0 : DATED:Febr y 25, uàr 2011 jj ' ! k 1 2 k i 1 3 i 1 4 i , 15 ' Uni St t ed i ' 1 6 l 1 7 ë 1 8 i t 19 I i 20 1 21 22 ; 23 ! 24 ë 2j i i 26 i 27 ; 28 j ! ! l ! ! DititJudge s rc ' i r ' -3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
