Countryman v. State Of Nevada et al
Filing
79
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's 67 Report and Recommendation entered on September 18, 2012 is reinstated and adopted and accepted, and Defendant's 52 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 54 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 02/23/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
*****
9
10
11
12
13
RALPH COUNTRYMAN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA; et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
3:10-cv-00107-LRH-WGC
ORDER
14
15
Before this Court is the Order Reinstating Report and Recommendation (Doc.#67), and
16
Supplemental Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#781) entered
17
on December 17, 2012, recommending granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (#52)
18
filed on May 15, 2012, and denying Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#54) filed on
19
May 17, 2012. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was
20
referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the
21
Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
22
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and
23
memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B)
24
and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
25
26
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
1
(#67) entered on September 18, 2012, should be reinstated, and adopted and accepted.
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#67)
3
entered on September 18, 2012, is reinstated and adopted and accepted, and Defendant’s Motion for
4
Summary Judgment (#52) is GRANTED.
5
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#54) is
DENIED.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
DATED this 23rd day of February, 2013.
9
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
