Fitzgerald v. Quality Loan Service Corporation et al

Filing 35

ORDER STAYING CASE : All proceedings in this case are STAYED pending Judge Teilborg's (MDL) order to remand back to this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UN I E D STATES D I T R I T CO U RT T S C 7 8 DI TRI T OF NEVADA SC 9 ROBERT L,FIZGERALD, T 1 0 l1 v. 3:O- V- OOOI RCJ-VPC) IC O -I O RDER Pl i tf , a n if 1 Q UA LI Y LO A N SERVI E 2 T C C O R PO RA T I N , al, O et . 1 3 D ef ndant . e s 14 15 1 6 The Cour s ays aI pr ceedi gsi t i case f r he f low i g r ason.Att e end ofl st tt Io n n hs o t ol n e h a l year t e Unied Stt sJudiil 7 ,h t ae ca PanelonMuliDititLiiaton,(he ' ane1) c nsol at d t- src tg i t ' P ', o i e d l numer uscasesi whih pl i t f al get atM orgage El ctoni RegitatonSys em s,nc, 8 o n c ani s l h fe t er c sr i t l, 1 (M ERS', 9' ' ' engaged i i pr perbusiesspr ctceswhenpr cessighomeIans.ThePanel ) nm o n ai o n o 2 assi ned JudgeTeibor i t e DititofArzonat over ee t ese cases,and he wi pr si e 0 g l g n h s rc i o sh l ed l 21 overaIisues( ic v r ,dipost e motons,setlm en)exceptf rtif. I r Morgage Is ds o e y s ii v i te t o ras n e t 2 El cr nl Re itat n Sy t m s ( ERS)Lt ai n,MDL No.211 ( ec 7,20 9 . I i 2 e to ' gsr i c o se M ig t io . 9D . 0) nt s 23 deci i n t cr at t i m ulidi t itl i aton, he Panel so o e e h s t s rc i g i t t cons l at d ni e cases f om Nevada, oi e n d r 24 butnot d t ataddi onal'ag- l ng' cases w i si i rf c uali sues c ul be added t t e eh t i ' ao ' t t ml at s h a od oh 25 I tofconsoldat d cases. i s ie 26 Fol w i gt ePanel decii n, ERS movedt add numer us'ag- l n ' as st t e l nh o ' s so M o o ' ao g' e o h t c 2 m ulidit i tI i aton, 7 t- s rc i g i one ofw hi h i t e c se cur enty bef r t e Coud. The Panel an ed t c sh a rl oe h gr t 28 M E R S'r quest ,but onl as t t ose i di i ualc ai s t at' el t t t e f r aton e s y oh n vd l m h ' ae o h o m i r 1 * 1 oper ton of M E R S . The Panelf rher i di at d t at ' I cl i s i t ese ac i ns t atar ai ' ' ut n c e h a1 a m n h to h e 2 unr l t d t t e f r aton and/ r oper ton of t e M ER S sys em ar separ t l and eae o h o m i o ai h t e aey 3 si ulaneousl r m anded't t e di ti tcour i whi h t ey w er fr tbr ught mt ye o h s rc tn ch e is o . 4 l I htoft e Panel deci i n , ER S and t e m any i di i ual ai tfs i t ese cases ni g h ' s so M h n v d pl n i n h f 5 have fl d m otons w ih Judge Tei or i w hi h t ey di put w hi h cl i s shoul be par of i e i t l gn b ch se c am d t 6 t e m ulidi t i tItgaton and w hi h shoul be sent back t t ei orgi alI catons, Judge h t- s rc ii i c d o h r in o i 7 Tei or w i be deci i g t i i s e once t e m ateri f l bref d .Becaus oft e hi h vol m e lgl b l d n hs s u h t s ul i e y ehg u 8 ofc s s i vol ed i t ese m otons,t il a num berofm ont s untl ae n v nh i iw lbe h iJudge Tei or has r l d lg b ue 9 on aloft e isues afectng t i case. Accor i gl ,t e Cour her by st ys aIpr c edi gs Ihs f i hs dn y h te a I oe n 1 i t i case, The Cour wil 0 n hs t l addr ss t e m otons i t i cas i t e eventt atJudge Tei or eh i n hs e n h h lg b l r m ands cl i s back t t i Cour. le am o hs t 1 2 1 3 C oscu sl N uo Acc r i gl ,I I O R D E R E D t ataI pr ceedi gs i t i cas ar STAYED pendi g o dn y T S h lo n n hs ee n 1 Judge Tei or ' or ert r m and bac t t i Coud. 4 l gs d o e b k o hs 1 5 16 17 Z ? DATE Ths ,'V- dyo Api2 1, D: i ., a f r, 0 0 o l - 18 1 9 20 21 22 . R er C u One t U N I E D YTAT . DI TR I T JUDG E T S C 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?