Boren v. Inspector General et al
Filing
145
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice due to plaintiff's repeated failures to comply with court orders. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 02/12/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
14
15
16
REO BOREN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HOLLINGSWORTH,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________ )
3:09-cv-00731-HDM-WGC
ORDER
17
Trial in this matter is scheduled to begin on February 26,
18
2013.
Plaintiff has failed to file a proposed pretrial order as
19
ordered by the court or, since February 2012, to make any other
20
appearance in this action.
It further appears that, based on a
21
forwarding address obtained by defense counsel after attempting to
22
mail correspondence to plaintiff in September 2012, the plaintiff
23
has failed to keep the court apprised of his current address.
24
On January 28, 2013, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause
25
on or before February 11, 2013, why this action should not be
26
dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court
27
orders, and failure to notify the court of a change in address.
28
1
1
The order to show cause was served on plaintiff at both the address
2
on file with the court and the forwarding address obtained by
3
defense counsel.
4
order or to file any other document with the court.
5
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), Local Rule 41-1,
6
and Local Special Rule 2-2, this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH
7
PREJUDICE.
8
plaintiff’s repeated failures to comply with court orders and the
9
fact that trial was set to begin two weeks from today’s date.
Plaintiff has failed to respond to the court’s
Accordingly,
Dismissal with prejudice is appropriate due to
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
DATED: This 12th day of February, 2013.
12
13
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
