Sage et al v. BNC Mortgage, Inc. et al - Document 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNI E D STA TE S DI TR I T CO U R T T SC DI TR I T O F NEVA DA SC 9 CHRI TI A SAGE and BRYAN SAGE, SN 1 0 11 v. 3: 9- V- O689- CJ-VPC) 0C 0 R( O RD ER Pl i tf, an i f 1 BNC M O R TG A G E ,I C . etal, 2 N, . 13 14 Def ndant . e s 1 5 The Cour st ys al pr ceedi gs i t i case f rt e f low i g r ason.Att e end ofl st ta Io n n hs o h ol n e h a 1 year t e Uni d St t sJudiilPanel MuliDititLigaton,(he ' aneI) c nsol aed 6 ,h t e ae ca on t- src t i t P ', o i t i ' d 1 num er us cases i w hi h pl i t f al ge t atM orgage El ctoni Regi t at n Syst m s, nc. 7 o n c an is l f eh t er c sr i o e l, 1 (M ERS', ga edi i p o e b sn s p a t e wh np oc s igho eIa s ThePa e 8' ' ' en g n m r p r u ie s r c i s e r e sn m o n . ) c nl l assi ned Judge Tei or i t e DititofArzonat over ee t ese cases, 9 g l g n h s rc b i o sh and he wi pr si e l ed l 2 o e aIis e ( ic v r , ipo iv mot ns s tlm e t e c p f rtil. I r Mo tag 0 v r Is u s ds o e y ds st e i , et n ) x e t o r s n e rg e i o e a Elcr ni Re ita in Sy tm s ( ERS)Lt a in,MDL No.21 9 ( ec 7,2 09) l i e to c gsr t o se M ig t io 1 D . 0 . nt s 22 decsi nt cr at t i mulidititli at n, he Panel onsol at d ni e casesfom Nevada, i o o e e hs t- s rc ig i t to c ie n d r 23 butnot d t ataddii nal'ag- l ng'cases w i si i rf c uali sues c ul be added t t e eh to t ao t ml at s h a od oh 24 lstofconsol at d cases. i ie d 25 Fol w i g t e Panel deci i n, ER S m oved t add num er us'ag- l ng'casest t e lnh o ' s so M o o d ao ' t oh 26 m ulidititI i aton,one ofwhi h i t e case curen l be or t e Cour.The Panel ant d t s rc ig i t c sh r ty f e h t gr e 27 M ERS'r quest ,butonl as t t os idi i ualcai s t at'el t t t e f r aton and/ r e s y o h e n vd f m h ' ae o h o m i r o 28 oper t n of M ER S . The Panelf dher i di at d t at ' l cl i s i t ese act ns t at ar ai o ' ' u n c e h ' l am n h a i o h e 1  ' .y , : l unr lt d t t e f r at n and/ r oper ton of t e MERS sy t m ar separ t l and ea e o h o m i o o ai h se e aey 2 si ulaneousl r m anded't t e dititcour i whi h t ey wer fr tbr ught mt ye o h s rc tn c h e is o . 3 I I h oft e Panel dec si n,M ER S and t e m any i di i ual ai t f i t es cases ni t h g ' s io h n v d pl n i s n h e f 4 have fl d m otons wih J dge Tei or i w hi h t ey di put w hi h cl i s shoul be pad of i e i tu l gn b ch s e c am d 5 t e m ulidi ti t I i aton and w hi h shoul be sent back t t ei orgi all cat ns. Judge h t- s rc i g i t c d o h r in o i o 6 Teibor w ilbe deci i g t i i sue once t e m ateri f ly bref d.Because oft e hi h vol m e lgl dn hs s h t s ul i e hg u 7 ofcases i vol ed i t ese m otons,iw il a num berofm ont s untl n v nh i t lbe h iJudge Tei or has r l d lg b ue 8 on a1 oft e i sues af ec i g t i c se. Accor i gl ,t e Cour her by st ys aI pr ceedi gs 1 hs f tn h s a dn y h te a Io n 9 i t i case,The Cour wi addr ss t e m otons i t i case i t e even t atJudge Tei or n hs tl l eh i n hs nh th lg b 1 r m ands c ai s bac t t i C our. 0e lm k o hs ' t 11 CoNclusl N -o 1 2 A c or i gl ,I I O R D ER ED t ataI pr ceedi gs i t i case ar STAY E D pendi g c dn y T S h Io n n hs e n 1 Judge Tei or ' or ert r m and back t t i Coud. 3 l gs d o e b o hs 1 4 1 5 D TED: i A Ths . ' V d yo Api2 1 . a f r,0 0 l 16 17 1 8 19 20 2l 22 UNI ED ST T o etZu o r ln - DI TRI T JUDG E SSC 23 24 25 26 27 28 2