Sage et al v. BNC Mortgage, Inc. et al
Filing
25
ORDER STAYING CASE : All proceedings in this case are STAYED pending Judge Teilborg's (MDL) order to remand back to this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
<![CDATA[
1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8
UNI E D STA TE S DI TR I T CO U R T T SC DI TR I T O F NEVA DA SC
9 CHRI TI A SAGE and BRYAN SAGE, SN
1 0
11 v.
3: 9- V- O689- CJ-VPC) 0C 0 R(
O RD ER
Pl i tf, an i f
1 BNC M O R TG A G E ,I C . etal, 2 N, .
13
14
Def ndant . e s
1 5
The Cour st ys al pr ceedi gs i t i case f rt e f low i g r ason.Att e end ofl st ta Io n n hs o h ol n e h a
1 year t e Uni d St t sJudiilPanel MuliDititLigaton,(he ' aneI) c nsol aed 6 ,h t e ae ca on t- src t i t P ', o i t i ' d
1 num er us cases i w hi h pl i t f al ge t atM orgage El ctoni Regi t at n Syst m s, nc. 7 o n c an is l f eh t er c sr i o e l,
1 (M ERS', ga edi i p o e b sn s p a t e wh np oc s igho eIa s ThePa e 8' ' ' en g n m r p r u ie s r c i s e r e sn m o n . ) c nl
l assi ned Judge Tei or i t e DititofArzonat over ee t ese cases, 9 g l g n h s rc b i o sh and he wi pr si e l ed l
2 o e aIis e ( ic v r , ipo iv mot ns s tlm e t e c p f rtil. I r Mo tag 0 v r Is u s ds o e y ds st e i , et n ) x e t o r s n e rg e i o e a Elcr ni Re ita in Sy tm s ( ERS)Lt a in,MDL No.21 9 ( ec 7,2 09) l i e to c gsr t o se M ig t io 1 D . 0 . nt s
22 decsi nt cr at t i mulidititli at n, he Panel onsol at d ni e casesfom Nevada, i o o e e hs t- s rc ig i t to c ie n d r
23 butnot d t ataddii nal'ag- l ng'cases w i si i rf c uali sues c ul be added t t e eh to t ao t ml at s h a od oh
24 lstofconsol at d cases. i ie d
25
Fol w i g t e Panel deci i n, ER S m oved t add num er us'ag- l ng'casest t e lnh o ' s so M o o d ao ' t oh
26 m ulidititI i aton,one ofwhi h i t e case curen l be or t e Cour.The Panel ant d t s rc ig i t c sh r ty f e h t gr e 27 M ERS'r quest ,butonl as t t os idi i ualcai s t at'el t t t e f r aton and/ r e s y o h e n vd f m h ' ae o h o m i r o
28 oper t n of M ER S . The Panelf dher i di at d t at ' l cl i s i t ese act ns t at ar ai o ' ' u n c e h ' l am n h a i o h e
1
' .y ,
:
l unr lt d t t e f r at n and/ r oper ton of t e MERS sy t m ar separ t l and ea e o h o m i o o ai h se e aey 2 si ulaneousl r m anded't t e dititcour i whi h t ey wer fr tbr ught mt ye o h s rc tn c h e is o .
3 I I h oft e Panel dec si n,M ER S and t e m any i di i ual ai t f i t es cases ni t h g ' s io h n v d pl n i s n h e f
4 have fl d m otons wih J dge Tei or i w hi h t ey di put w hi h cl i s shoul be pad of i e i tu l gn b ch s e c am d 5 t e m ulidi ti t I i aton and w hi h shoul be sent back t t ei orgi all cat ns. Judge h t- s rc i g i t c d o h r in o i o
6 Teibor w ilbe deci i g t i i sue once t e m ateri f ly bref d.Because oft e hi h vol m e lgl dn hs s h t s ul i e hg u
7 ofcases i vol ed i t ese m otons,iw il a num berofm ont s untl n v nh i t lbe h iJudge Tei or has r l d lg b ue 8 on a1 oft e i sues af ec i g t i c se. Accor i gl ,t e Cour her by st ys aI pr ceedi gs 1 hs f tn h s a dn y h te a Io n
9 i t i case,The Cour wi addr ss t e m otons i t i case i t e even t atJudge Tei or n hs tl l eh i n hs nh th lg b
1 r m ands c ai s bac t t i C our. 0e lm k o hs ' t
11 CoNclusl N -o
1 2
A c or i gl ,I I O R D ER ED t ataI pr ceedi gs i t i case ar STAY E D pendi g c dn y T S h Io n n hs e n
1 Judge Tei or ' or ert r m and back t t i Coud. 3 l gs d o e b o hs
1 4
1 5
D TED: i A Ths . ' V
d yo Api2 1 . a f r,0 0 l
16 17
1 8
19 20 2l
22
UNI ED ST T
o etZu o r ln
- DI TRI T JUDG E SSC
23
24
25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
