McConathy et al v. Gateway Business Bank, dba, Mission Hills Mortgage Bankers et al
Filing
22
ORDER STAYING CASE : All proceedings in this case are STAYED pending Judge Teilborg's (MDL) order to remand back to this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
<![CDATA[
# >
1
2 3
4 5
6
U N I E D STATES DI T R I T CO U R T T SC
7
8
DI TRI T OF NEVADA SC
9 DAVI R MCCONATHY and LYNN D M CCONATHY, l 0 Plitfs, an i f 11 v. 1 2 GATEW AY BUSI ESS BANK,etaI, N . 1 3 Defndant . e s l 4
15
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
3;9- V- O665- CJ-VPC) OC O R(
( FDEF )k l
1 6
The C oud st ys af pr c edi gs i t i c se f rt e f l w i g r as n.Att e end ofI st a l o e n n hs a o h o l n e o o h a
1 year t e Uni d Stt sJ diilPanelon MuliDititLiiaton,(he ' aneI) c nsol at d 7 ,h t a e u ca e t src tg i t t P ', o i e d
1 numer usc sesi whih pl i tfsal get atM odgage El ctoni Regitat n Syst m s,l c. 8 oa n c an i l feh er c sr i o e n,
1 (M ERS', ng ge i i p o e b sn s p a t e wh np o e sn h m eIa s Th Pan l 9d ' )e a d n m r p r u ie s r ci s e r c s ig o o n . e e c
2 assi ned Judge Tei or i t e DititofArzona t over ee t ese cases,and he wi pr si e 0 g l g n h s rc b i o sh l ed l
21 overaIisues( ic v r ,dipost emotons,setlm en)ex eptf rtil. I r Morgage Is ds o e y s ii v i te t c o ras n e t 2 Elcr ni Re it t n Sy tm s ( E S)Lt at n,MDL No. 1 ( ec 7,2 09) I i 2 e to c gsr i a o se & E ig i io 21 9 D . 0 . n t s
23 decii n t cr at t i mulidititI iaton,he Panel so o e e h s t- s rc ig i t t cons l at d ni e casesfom Nevada, oi e n d r 24 butnot d t ataddii nal' g- l ng'cases wih si i rf c ualisues c ul be added t t e eh to 'a a o t t ml at s a od oh
25 I tofc ns l at d cases. i s o oi e d
26
Fol w ig t ePanel decii n, ERS mov dt add numer usdag- l ng'cas st t e lnh o ' s so M eo o ' ao t e oh
27 m ulidi ti tl i aton, t- s rc i g i one ofw hi h i t e c se cur enty bef r t e Cou t The Panel ant d t c sh a rl oeh f. gr e 28 M E R S'r quest ,butonl as t t ose i di i ualcl i s t atl el t t t e f r aton and/ r e s y oh n vd am h ' a e o h o m i r o
oper ton of M ER S . The Panelf rher i di at d t at' I c ai s i t es actons t at ar ai ' ' ul n c e h 'Ilm n h e i a h e 2 unr l t d t t e f r at n and/ r oper t n of t e M E R S s st m ar separ t l and ea e o h o m i o o ai o h ye e a ey 3 si ulaneousl r m anded't t e dit i tc ur i w hi h t ey w er fr tbr ught mt ye o h s rc o t n ch e is o . 4 I I htof he Panel deci i n,M E R S and t e m any i di i ual ai tfs i t ese cases ni g t ' s so h n v d pl n if n h
5 have fl d m otons w ih Judge Tei or i w hi h t ey di put w hi h cl i s shoul be par of i e i t l gn b ch se c am d t
6 t e m ulidi ti t Itgaton and w hi h shoul be sentback t t ei orgi alI catons. Judge h t- s rc ii i c d o h r in o i
7 Tei or w i be deci i g t i i sue once t e m ateri f l bref d. Because oft e hi h v l m e lgl b l dn hs s h t s ul i e y h g ou 8 ofcases i vol ed i t ese m ot ns,t i be a num ber fm ont s untl n v nh i o iw l l o h iJudge Tei or has r l d lg b ue 9 on aI oft e i sues afec i g t i c s . Accor i gl ,t e Cour her by st y aI pr ceedi gs I hs f tn h s a e dn y h te as l o n 1 i t i case. The C our w i addr ss t e m otons i t i case i t e eventt atJudge Tei or 0 n hs ll l eh i n hs nh h lg b 11 r m ands cl i s back t t i C our. e am o hs t
12 CONCLUSI N O
1 3
Ac or i gl ,I I O R D E R ED t ataI pr c edi gs i t i c se ar STAYED pendi g c dn y T S h I o e n n hs a e n
14 Judge Teibor ' or ert r m and back t t i Coud. l gs d o e o hs
1 5
l 6
l 7
D T D:hs -)j dy f r,00 A E ' i V-, a oApi2 1. r ',/ l
1 8
* o er u On t
1 9
20
21 22
UN I E D STAT T
DI T R I T JUDG E S C
23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
