Ellifritz et al v. Netbank et al

Filing 22

ORDER STAYING CASE : All proceedings in this case are STAYED pending Judge Teilborg's (MDL) order to remand back to this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 U N I E D STATES DI T R I T C O U R T T S C 7 8 DI TR I T OF NEVADA SC 9 STUART M ELLI RI Z andTHERESA A FT ELLI RIZ, FT 1 0 Plitf , an is f ) ) ) ) 3: 9- V- O663- CJ ( PC) OC 0 R -V ORDER 1V 1. 1 2 1 3 NETBANK,etaI, . Def ndant . e s y ) ) ) ) 1 4 15 1 6 j The Cour s aysalpr ceedi gs i t i c sef r hef l w i g r as n.At he end ofI s tt Io n n hs a o t o l n e o o t at 1 year t e Unied St t sJudiilPanel MuliDititLiiaton,(he ' aneI) consol atd 7 ,h t ae ca on t- src tg i t P ', ' ie d 1 num er us cas s i whi h pl i tfs al ge t atM orgage Eà ctoni Regi taton Syst m s,l c. 8 o e n c a n if l eh t er c sr i e n, 1 (MERS', 9' ' ' engagedi i pr perbusiesspr ctceswhenpr ces ighomeIans.The Panel ) nm o n ai o sn o 2 assi ned Judge Tei or i t e Di t i t Arzona t over ee t ese cases, 0 g l g n h s rc of i b o sh and he wil esi e l pr d 21 overaIisues( icover,diposiie mot ns,setlment excep f rtil. I r Morgage 1s ds y s tv i o te ) t o ras n e t 2 El cr nc Re itat n Sy t m s ( ERSjLt aln,MDL No.211 ( ec 7,20 9 . I i 2 e to i gsr i o se M ig t ib 9D . 0) nt s 2 deci i n t cr at t i m ul - i ti tI i aton, he Panel 3 s o o e e h s t d s rc ig i t i t cons l at d ni e cases f om Nevada, oi e n d r 24 butnot d t ataddionalGag- l ng'c ses wi si i rf c ualisues c ul be added t t e eh t i t ao ' a t ml at s h a od oh 25 lstofconsoldat d cases. i ie 26 Fol w i g t e Panel deci i n,M E R S m oved t add num er us 'ag- l ng' asest t e lnh o ' s so o o t ao c oh 27 m ulidi ti tI i aton, t- s rc i g i one ofw hi h i t e case cur enty bef r t e Cour. The Panel ant d t c sh rl oe h t gr e 28 M E R S 'r ques s,bu onl as t t ose i di i ualcl i s t at' et t t t e f r aton and/ r e t ty oh n vd am h ' ae o h o m i r o 1 oper ton of M ER S . The Panelf r heri di at d t at ' I cl i s i t ese ac i ns t at ar ai ' ' ut n c e h aI am n h to h e 2 unr l t d t t e f r aton and/ r oper ton of t e M ER S sys em ar separ t l and eae o h o m i o ai h t e aey 3 si ul neousl r m anded't t e di t itcour i w hi h t ey w er fr tbr ught mt a ye ' o h s rc tn ch e is o . 4 I I htoft e Panel dec si n, E R S and t e m any i di i ual ai tfs i t ese cases ni g h ' s io M h n v d pl n i n h f 5 have fl d m otons w ih Judge Tei or i w hi h t ey di put whi h cl i s shoul be pad of i e i t l gn b ch se c am d 6 t e m ulidi ti t I i aton and w hi h shoul be sent back t t ei orgi alI catons. Judge h t- s rc i g i t c d o h r in o i 7 Tei or w i be deci i g t i i sue onc t e m ateri f l bre ed.Becaus oft e hi h vol m e lgl b l d n hs s eh t s u l if y ehg u 8 ofcas s i vol ed i t ese m otons,tw i be a num berofm ont s untl udge Tei or has r l d e n v nh i il l h iJ lg b ue 9 on al oft e i sues a f c i g t i case. Accor i gl , he Cour her by st ys aI pr ceedi gs lhs f e tn h s dn y t te a Io n 1 i t i case.The Cour w iladdr ss t e m otons i t i case i t e eventt atJudge Teibor 0 n hs tl eh i n hs nh h lg ll r m ands cl i s back t t i Cour . e am o hs t 1 2 CoNclusl N -o 1 3 Accor i gl ,I I O R D E R ED t ataI pr ceedi gs i t i cas ar STAY ED pendi g dn y T S h Io n n hs ee n 1 Judge Tei or ' or ert r m and back t t i C our. 4 l gs d o e b o hs t l s 16 17 oA-Eo: as . y./'da o Apr, oq . r vi . . i ,, -, 2 f y f iz o l 18 1 9 20 21 22 23 24 UNI ED LT Es DITRI T J ooE T SCu ' ober c t s 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?