CARR
Filing
164
ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT, AUTHORIZING NOTICE TO THE SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND SETTING A HEARING ON FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL, re 160 Proposed Order. Settlement Hearing set for 6/3/2013 09:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 6 before Chief Judge Robert C. Jones. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 2/20/2013 for spelling (DRM).
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
12
CHRISTOPHER CARR, ROXANNE
CLAYTON and BRIAN BENNETT, on Behalf
of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,
Case No.: 3:09-cv-00584-RCJ-WGC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PRELIMINARILY APPROVING
SETTLEMENT, AUTHORIZING
NOTICE TO THE SETTLEMENT
CLASS, AND SETTING A HEARING
ON FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,
et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
RANDOLPH K. JORDAN and KIMBERLY J.
JORDAN, on Behalf of Themselves and a
Class of Persons Similarly Situated,
Case No.: 3:09-cv-00585-RCJ-WGC
20
Plaintiffs,
21
v.
22
23
24
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,
et al.,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
1
1
Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the
2 “Settlement”) of the above-entitled consolidated class actions (the “Action”) asserting
3 claims for alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
4 as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (“ERISA”), with respect to the International Game
5 Technology Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”) as against defendant International Game
6 Technology (“IGT”) and others alleged to be fiduciaries of the Plan (collectively, the
7 “Defendants”).
8
The terms of the Settlement are set out in a Stipulation of Settlement dated
9 December 21, 2012 (the “Stipulation”) that has been executed by counsel for Plaintiffs
10 Christopher Carr, Brian Bennett, Randolph K. Jordan and Kimberly J. Jordan
11 (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) and for the Settlement Class and counsel for Defendants
12 (collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in
13 this Order shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Stipulation. The
14 “Settlement Class” is defined in this Order below.
15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as
16 follows:
17
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement is
18 GRANTED.
19
2.
The Court finds, subject to final determination following a hearing on
20 notice to potential class members, that the proposed Settlement set forth in the Stipulation
21 is sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate such that notice of the Settlement should be
22 provided to the Settlement Class (defined in paragraph 5 of this Order) and a hearing
23 should be held as provided in paragraph 14 of this Order.
24
3.
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Action and over
25 all Parties to this Action, including all Members of the Settlement Class.
26
27
28
1
1
2
SETTLEMENT CLASS CERTIFICATION
4.
The Court PRELIMINARILY FINDS, for settlement purposes only, that
3 the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution,
4 the local rules of the Court, and any other applicable law have been met as to the
5 Settlement Class, in that:
6
7
The Settlement Class is ascertainable from records kept with respect to the
Plan and from other objective criteria, and the Members of the Settlement
Class are so numerous that their joinder before the Court would be
impracticable;
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
There are one or more questions of fact and/or law common to the
Settlement Class;
Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Settlement
Class and Plaintiffs are represented by qualified counsel who are
experienced in prosecuting ERISA class actions of this type; and
The prosecution of separate actions by individual Members of the
Settlement Class would create a risk of: (i) inconsistent or varying
adjudications as to individual class members that would establish
incompatible standards of conduct for the parties opposing the claims
asserted in the Action; or (ii) adjudications as to individual class members
that would, as a practical matter, be dispositive of the interests of the other
members not parties to the adjudications, or substantially impair or impede
those persons’ ability to protect their interests.
16
17
5.
Based on the findings set out above, the Court PRELIMINARILY
18 CERTIFIES the following non-opt-out class, for the purposes of settlement of this Action
19 only, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(1) (the “Settlement Class”):
22
All persons who were participants in or beneficiaries of the Plan at any
time between November 1, 2007, through and including April 23, 2009,
and whose individual Plan accounts included investments in the IGT Stock
Fund at any time between November 1, 2007, through and including April
23, 2009, excluding Defendants and their immediate family members.
23
6.
20
21
Having determined preliminarily that this Action may proceed as a non-
24 opt-out class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(1), the Court
25 hereby appoints Plaintiffs as the representatives of the Settlement Class.
26
7.
The Court, having determined preliminarily that this Action may proceed
27 as a non-opt-out class action, finds that Members of the Settlement Class shall be bound
28
2
1 by any judgment concerning the Settlement in this Action, subject to the Court’s final
2 determination as to whether this Action may proceed as a non-opt-out class action.
3
8.
As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g), the Court also has
4 considered: (i) the work Plaintiffs’ Counsel has done in identifying or investigating
5 potential claims in this Action; (ii) Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s experience in handling class
6 actions, other complex litigation, and claims of the type asserted in this Action; (iii)
7 Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s knowledge of ERISA as it applies to claims asserted in this Action
8 (breach of fiduciary duty claims relating to the Plan’s investment in company stock); and
9 (iv) the resources Plaintiffs’ Counsel has committed to representing Plaintiffs in this
10 Action. Based on these factors, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ Counsel has and will
11 continue to represent fairly and adequately the interests of the Settlement Class.
12 Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g)(2), the Court
13 preliminarily designates Gainey & McKenna and Stull, Stull & Brody as co-class counsel
14 (“Plaintiffs’ Counsel”) with respect to the Settlement Class in this Action.
15
16
CLASS NOTICE
9.
The Parties have presented to the Court a proposed Class Notice, which is
17 appended hereto as Exhibit A. The Court APPROVES the form and content of the Class
18 Notice finding that it fairly and adequately: (1) describes the terms and effect of the
19 Stipulation and the Settlement; (2) gives notice to the Settlement Class of the time and
20 place of the Settlement Fairness Hearing; and (3) describes how recipients of the Class
21 Notice may object to approval of the Settlement. Having reviewed the Stipulation, which
22 provides for the manner of distributing the Class Notice to members of the Settlement
23 Class, the Court further finds that such proposed manner is adequate, and directs that no
24 later than March 5, 2013, Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall cause the Class Notice, with any non25 substantive modifications thereto as may be agreed upon by the Parties, to be distributed
26 to each member of the Settlement Class who can be identified through good-faith,
27 reasonable efforts at his or her last-known address maintained by the Plan’s record28
3
1 keeper or his or her e-mail address (if readily available to the Plan’s record-keeper). By
2 no later than March 5, 2013, Plaintiffs’ Counsel also shall cause the Class Notice to be
3 published on the website identified in the Class Notice. No later than May 27, 2013,
4 Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall file with the Court proof of Plaintiffs’ timely compliance with
5 the foregoing mailing and publication requirements.
6
10.
The expenses of effectuating Class Notice shall be paid pursuant to the
7 terms of the Stipulation.
8
9
OBJECTIONS TO SETTLEMENT
11.
“Objector” shall mean any member of the Settlement Class who wishes to
10 object to the fairness, reasonableness or adequacy of the Settlement; any term of the
11 Stipulation; the Plan of Allocation as described in the Class Notice; or the proposed
12 award of attorneys’ fees and expenses or the case contribution awards for Plaintiffs. Any
13 Objector must file with the Court a statement of his, her, or its objection(s), specifying
14 the reason(s), if any, for each such objection made, including any legal support and/or
15 evidence that such Objector wishes to bring to the Court’s attention or introduce in
16 support of such objection. Any Objector must also, as a part of his or her statement or
17 through an attachment thereto, provide evidence or affirm that he or she is a member of
18 the Settlement Class. The Objector must also mail the objection and all supporting law
19 and/or evidence to counsel for the Parties, as described below. The addresses for filing
20 objections with the Court and service on counsel are as follows:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
The Court
Plaintiffs’ Counsel
Defendants’ Counsel
2
3
Clerk of the Court
U.S. Courthouse
400 So. Virginia
Street Reno, Nevada
89501
Thomas J. McKenna
GAINEY & MCKENNA
440 Park Avenue South, 5th
Floor
New York, New York 10016
Boris Feldman
Diane Walters
WILSON SONSINI
GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
4
5
Michael J. Klein
STULL, STULL & BRODY
6 East 45th Street
New York, NY 10017
6
7
8
9
a.
The Objector, or, if represented by counsel, his or her counsel, must both
10 effect service of the objection on counsel listed above and file the objection with the
11 Court at least fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the Fairness Hearing, or by no later
12 than May 20, 2013. The Parties’ counsel shall confer with one another about any and all
13 objections that come into their possession and will promptly furnish one another with
14 copies of any and all objections not received by all such counsel.
15
b.
Any member of the Settlement Class or other person who does not timely
16 file and serve a written objection complying with the terms of this paragraph shall be
17 deemed to have waived, and shall be foreclosed from raising, any objection to the
18 Settlement, and any untimely objection shall be barred.
19
12.
Appearance at Settlement Fairness Hearing. Any Objector who files
20 and serves a timely, written objection in accordance with the paragraph above may also
21 appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing either in person or through counsel retained at
22 the Objector’s expense. Objectors or their attorneys intending to appear at the Settlement
23 Fairness Hearing must effect service of a “Notice of Intention to Appear” setting forth,
24 among other things, the name, address, and telephone number of the Objector (and, if
25 applicable, the name, address, and telephone number of the Objector’s attorney) on
26 counsel identified above and file it with the Court at least fourteen (14)
27
28
5
calendar days
1 prior to the Settlement Fairness Hearing, or by no later than May 20, 2013. Any Objector
2 who does not timely file and serve a “Notice of Intention to Appear” in accordance with
3 this paragraph shall not be permitted to appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing, except
4 for good cause shown.
5
13.
Response to Objectors. The Parties shall respond to any Objector at least
6 seven (7) calendar days prior to the Settlement Fairness Hearing, or by no later than May
7 27, 2013.
8
9
SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING
14.
A hearing (the “Settlement Fairness Hearing”) pursuant to Federal Rule of
10 Civil Procedure 23(e) is hereby SCHEDULED to be held before the Court on June 3,
11 2013, at 9 a.m. in the Courtroom of the Honorable Robert C. Jones at the United States
12 Courthouse for the District of Nevada at 400 South Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89501.
13
15.
At the hearing, the Court will consider matters relating to the Settlement,
14 including, among others, whether:
15
16
a.
provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate;
17
18
the proposed Settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions
b.
the Settlement, including the Plan of Allocation, should receive
final approval by the Court;
19
c.
Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees
20
and reimbursement of litigation expenses and case contribution awards for
21
Plaintiffs should be granted; and
e.
22
23
24
any other issues pertaining to final approval of the Settlement.
STAY AND INJUNCTION AS TO ALL NON-SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS
15.
The Action is stayed, except as to matters related to the Stipulation,
25 implementation of the Settlement, or matters relating to the Settlement Fund, including
26 applications for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses.
Pending final
27 determination of whether the Settlement should be approved, Plaintiffs, all Members of
28
6
1 the Settlement Class, and the Plan are each hereby BARRED AND ENJOINED from
2 instituting or prosecuting any claim, dispute, or action whatsoever that asserts any
3 Released Claim against any Defendants or Releasees.
4
5
OTHER PROVISIONS
16.
Defendants shall, on or before May 27, 2013, file with the Court proof of
6 compliance with the notice provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, as
7 codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1715.
8
17.
The retention of an Independent Fiduciary, and the payment of any fees
9 and expenses incurred by the Independent Fiduciary, shall be governed by the terms of
10 the Stipulation.
11
18.
Neither Defendants nor Defendants’ counsel shall have any responsibility
12 for the Plan of Allocation.
13
19.
Application for Fees, Expense and Incentive Awards. Any application
.
14 by Plaintiffs’ Counsel for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses and
15 for a case contribution award for any or all Plaintiffs, and all papers in support thereof,
16 shall be filed with the Court and served on all counsel of record at least twenty-eight (28)
17 calendar days prior to the Settlement Fairness Hearing, or by no later than May 6, 2013.
18 Copies of such materials shall be available for inspection at the office of the Clerk of this
19 Court, and shall be made available on a website identified in the Class Notice as soon as
20 practicable after they are filed with the Court. Neither Defendants nor Defendants’
21 counsel shall have any responsibility or liability for any application for attorneys’ fees,
22 reimbursement of expenses, or payment of case contribution awards, and such matters
23 shall be considered separately from the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the
24 Settlement.
25
20.
Upon the occurrence of Final Settlement Approval, Plaintiffs, individually
26 and on behalf of the Plan and the Settlement Class, and each of their custodians, agents,
27 assigns, representatives, heirs, executors, trustees, and administrators, shall be deemed
28
7
1 conclusively to have fully, finally, unconditionally and forever released, settled, and
2 discharged the Defendants and the other Releasees from, and with respect to, the
3 Released Claims.
4
21.
Termination of Settlement. If the Settlement is terminated in accordance
5 with the Stipulation or if the Settlement is not finalized for any other reason, this Order
6 and all findings herein shall become null and void, and shall be without prejudice to the
7 rights of the Parties, all of whom shall be restored to their respective positions existing
8 immediately before this Court entered this Order, preserving all of their respective claims
9 and defenses.
10
22.
Neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the
11 negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission,
12 concession, or declaration by any of the Defendants, or any of the Releasees, of the truth
13 of any of the allegations in the Action, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any
14 kind. In the event this Order becomes of no force or effect, no part of it shall be
15 construed or used as an admission, concession, or declaration by or against any
16 Defendants, or any of the Releasees of the truth of any of the allegations in the Action, or
17 of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind, nor shall the Order be construed or used
18 as an admission, concession, or declaration by or against Plaintiffs or the Settlement
19 Class that their claims lack merit or that the relief requested in the Action is
20 inappropriate, improper, or unavailable, or as a waiver by any party of any defenses or
21 claims he, she, or it may have with respect to the claims asserted in the Action.
22
23.
Continuance of Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the
.
23 Settlement Fairness Hearing without further written notice.
24
25
26
27
15th day of February, 2013.
SO ORDERED this ____ day of ___________ , 201_.
_______________________________
Honorable Robert C. Jones
United States District Judge
28
8
1 Respectfully submitted by,
2 MICHAEL J. KLEIN, admitted pro hac vice
STULL, STULL & BRODY
3 6 East 45th Street
New York, New York 10017
4 Telephone: (212) 687-7230
Facsimile: (212) 490-2022
5
PATRICE L. BISHOP, admitted pro hac vice
6 STULL, STULL & BRODY
9430 W. Olympic Boulevard
7 Suite 400
Beverly Hills, California 90212
8 Telephone: (310) 209-2468
Facsimile: (310) 209-2087
9
THOMAS J. McKENNA, admitted pro hac vice
10 GAINEY & McKENNA
295 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor
11 New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 983-1300
12
Interim Co-Lead counsel
13
GEOFFREY WHITE
14 WHITE & WETHERALL, LLP, Nevada Bar No. 0892
3185 Lakeside Drive
15 Reno, NV 89509
Telephone: (775) 828-9999
16 Facsimile: (775) 828-9998
17 MATTHEW L. SHARP, Nevada Bar No. 4746
MATTHEW L. SHARP, LTD.
18 419 Flint Street
Reno, NV 89501
19 Telephone: (212) 983-1300
20 Interim Co-Liaison counsel
21 BORIS FELDMAN, admitted pro hac vice
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
22 650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
23 Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
24
RICHARD G. CAMPBELL, JR.
25 BRET F. MEICH
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP
26 50 West Liberty, Suite 950
Reno, NV 89501
27 Telephone: (775) 322-7400
Facsimile: (775) 322-9049
28
9
1
Attorneys for International Game
2 Technology, IGT Profit Sharing Plan
Committee, David D. Johnson, Robert A.
3 Bittman, Richard R. Burt, Patti S. Hart,
Leslie S. Heisz, Robert A. Mathewson,
4 Thomas J. Matthews, Robert Miller, David
E. Roberson, and Philip G. Satre
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CHRISTOPHER CARR, ROXANNE
CLAYTON and BRIAN BENNETT, on Behalf
of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,
Case No.: 3:09-cv-00584-RCJ-WGC
Plaintiffs,
v.
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,
et al.,
Defendants.
RANDOLPH K. JORDAN and KIMBERLY J.
JORDAN, on Behalf of Themselves and a
Class of Persons Similarly Situated,
Case No.: 3:09-cv-00585-RCJ-WGC
Plaintiffs,
v.
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,
et al.,
Defendants.
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT,
SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS’
EXPENSES AND CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARD
TO THE FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT CLASS:
All persons who were participants in or beneficiaries of the IGT Profit Sharing Plan (the
“Plan”) at any time between November 1, 2007, through and including April 23, 2009, and
whose individual Plan accounts included investment in the IGT Stock Fund at any time between
November 1, 2007, through and including April 23, 2009. Excluded from the Settlement Class
are the Defendants and their immediate family members.
PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY.
A FEDERAL COURT AUTHORIZED THIS NOTICE.
THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION.
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the “Court”) has
preliminarily approved a proposed settlement (the “Settlement”) of a class action
lawsuit of the above-captioned cases (the “Action”) brought by plaintiffs Christopher
Carr, Brian Bennett, Randolph K. Jordan, and Kimberly Jordan (“Plaintiffs”) under
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”)
against International Game Technology (“IGT” or the “Company”), the IGT Profit
Sharing Committee, Robert A. Bittman, Richard R. Burt, Patti S. Hart, Leslie S.
Heisz, David D. Johnson, Robert A. Mathewson, Thomas J. Matthews, Robert Miller,
David E. Roberson, and Philip G. Satre (collectively, the “Defendants”),1 and would
release Defendants and related parties from any and all claims asserted in the Action
or that relate in any way to the facts and events alleged in the Action. The
Defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing, liability, or injury to
Plaintiffs and the Members of the Settlement Class. The Defendants have concluded
that it is desirable that the Action be settled in the manner and upon the terms and
conditions set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement (“Stipulation”) in order to avoid
the burden, expense, inconvenience, and distraction of further legal proceedings.
This Notice contains summary information with respect to the Settlement. The terms
and conditions of the Settlement are set forth in the Stipulation. Any capitalized
terms used in this Notice but not defined here have the meanings assigned to them in
the Stipulation. The Stipulation, and additional information with respect to the
Action and the Settlement, is available from Plaintiffs’ Counsel, who are listed on
page _ below, or at www.berdonclaims.com.
If the Court issues final approval of the Settlement, IGT will pay Five Hundred
Thousand U.S. Dollars ($500,000.00) into an Escrow Account, from which the net
amount of the Settlement Fund will be allocated to Settlement Class members’
accounts through the Plan.
1
THIS NOTICE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AND SHOULD NOT BE
CONSTRUED AS AN EXPRESSION OF ANY OPINION BY THE COURT WITH
RESPECT TO THE TRUTH OF THE ALLEGATIONS IN THE ACTION OR THE
MERITS OF THE CLAIMS OR DEFENSES ASSERTED. THIS NOTICE IS
MERELY TO ADVISE YOU OF THE PENDENCY OF THIS ACTION, THE
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND YOUR RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT.
The Court has scheduled a hearing concerning final approval of the Settlement and
Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses and case contribution
award (the “Settlement Fairness Hearing”). The Settlement Fairness Hearing, which
will take place before the Honorable Robert C. Jones, is scheduled on June 3, , 2013
at 9 a.m. at the United States Courthouse for the District of Nevada at 400 South
Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89501. If approved, the Settlement will bind all
Members of the Settlement Class. You may appear at this hearing and/or object to
Certain other defendants subsequently were dismissed.
the Settlement. Any objections to the Settlement or the motion for attorneys’ fees and
expenses and case contribution award must be served in writing on the Court and the
Parties’ counsel. More information about the hearing and how to object is explained
on pages __ through __ of this Notice.
PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND COMPLETELY. IF YOU
ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS TO WHOM THIS NOTICE IS
ADDRESSED, THE SETTLEMENT WILL AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. YOU ARE NOT
BEING SUED IN THIS MATTER. YOU NEED NOT APPEAR IN COURT, AND YOU
DO NOT NEED TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY IN THIS CASE. IF YOU ARE IN FAVOR
OF THE SETTLEMENT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO DO ANYTHING. IF YOU
DISAPPROVE, YOU MAY OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT UNDER THE
PROCEDURES DESCRIBED BELOW.
You Need Not Do
Anything to Receive Payment.
If the Settlement is approved by the Court and you are a
Member of the Settlement Class, you will not need to do
anything to receive a payment.
No Action is Necessary to
If you are a current participant in the Plan and are
authorized to receive a payment, the Plan’s record-keeper
will deposit the payment into your Plan account in the
manner you designate for Plan contributions.
If you are no longer a participant in any Plan and are
authorized to receive a payment, the payment will be
deposited into a newly-established account for you with
the applicable Plan or sent to you in the form of a check.
You Can Object
You can write to the Court if you do not like the
Settlement.
(By May 20, 2013
You___________, Hearing
(by Can Go to a 2013).
(on June 3, 2013).
You can ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the
Settlement.
These rights and options – and the deadlines to exercise them – are explained in this Notice.
The Court in charge of this case still has to decide whether to approve the Settlement.
Payments will be made to authorized Members of the Settlement Class only if the Court
approves the Settlement and that approval is upheld in the event of any appeals. Further
]\
information regarding the Action, the Settlement, and this Notice may be obtained by contacting
Plaintiffs’ Counsel, who are:
Michael J. Klein
STULL, STULL & BRODY
6 East 45th Street
New York, NY 10017
Tel: (212) 687-7230
E-mail: mklein@ssbny.com
Thomas J. McKenna
GAINEY & McKENNA
440 Park Avenue South, 5th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: (212) 983-1300
E-mail: tjmckenna@gaineyandmckenna.com
WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS
SUMMARY OF CASE......................................................................................................................
SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT ......................................................................................................
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL OUTCOME OF THE ACTION ...................................................
STATEMENT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES & EXPENSES SOUGHT IN THE ACTION .................
WHAT WILL THE PLAINTIFFS GET? ..........................................................................................
BASIC INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................
1. Why did I get this Notice package? ........................................................................................
2. What is the Action about and what has happened?.................................................................
3. Why is there a Settlement? .....................................................................................................
WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT? ...................................................................................................
4. How do I know whether I am part of the Settlement? ............................................................
5. Are there exceptions to being included? .................................................................................
THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS .....................................................................................................
6. What does the Settlement provide?.........................................................................................
7. How much will an individual payment be? ............................................................................
8. How can I get a payment? .......................................................................................................
9. When will payments be made? ...............................................................................................
PARTICIPATION IN THE SETTLEMENT.....................................................................................
10. Can I exclude myself from the Settlement? .............................................................................
THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU .......................................................................................
11. Do I have a lawyer in the case? ...............................................................................................
12. How will the lawyers be paid? .................................................................................................
OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT OR THE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES ..........
13. How do I tell the Court that I do not like the Settlement? .......................................................
THE COURT’S SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING ...............................................................
14. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? ..........................
15. Do I have to come to the Settlement Fairness Hearing? .........................................................
16. May I speak at the Settlement Fairness Hearing? ....................................................................
IF YOU DO NOTHING ....................................................................................................................
17. What happens if I do nothing at all? ........................................................................................
GETTING MORE INFORMATION .................................................................................................
18. Are there more details about the Settlement? ..........................................................................
19. How do I get more information? ..............................................................................................
SUMMARY OF CASE
As described in more detail below and in the Plaintiffs’ Complaint, this Action concerns
allegations that Defendants breached fiduciary duties owed to participants and beneficiaries in
the Plan during the Class Period. Defendants deny the allegations. Copies of Plaintiffs’
Complaint and documents related to the Settlement are available at www.berdonclaims.com.
SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT
IGT will cause to be deposited into an Escrow Account Five Hundred Thousand U.S.
Dollars (500,000.00) in cash. After payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses, the case
contribution award and other expenses associated with administering the Settlement, the amount
remaining in the Escrow Account (the “Net Settlement Fund”) shall be allocated among
authorized Members of the Settlement Class according to a Plan of Allocation to be approved by
the Court.
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL OUTCOME OF THE ACTION
Plaintiffs’ Counsel believes that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants are well grounded
in law and fact, and that Defendants committed breaches of fiduciary duty under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). However, as with any litigated case, the
Settlement Class would face an uncertain outcome if Plaintiffs continued the Action against
Defendants. Continuing the Action could result in a judgment or verdict greater or less than the
recovery under the Stipulation, or in no recovery at all. In evaluating the Settlement, Plaintiffs’
Counsel has considered the range of possible recoveries if the claims against Defendants were
adjudicated rather than settled.
Plaintiffs’ Counsel believes that this Settlement reflects a reasonable compromise in
light of the range of possible outcomes. Plaintiffs’ Counsel believes that the Settlement is
preferable to continuing the Action and is in the best interests of the Settlement Class because
the Settlement provides certainty to the Settlement Class with respect to the amount of recovery
and should result in the recovery actually being realized substantially prior to the time it would
be were the case successfully litigated to a conclusion.
Throughout this Action, Defendants have denied and continue to deny the factual
allegations and legal claims asserted by Plaintiffs. The Defendants expressly have denied and
continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the
conduct, statements, acts or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Action.
Nevertheless, Defendants have concluded that a full and final settlement of the Action as to
them and the other Releasees on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation is desirable
to avoid the burden, expense, inconvenience, and distraction of further litigation.
STATEMENT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
SOUGHT IN THE ACTION
Plaintiffs’ Counsel in the Action will submit a fee petition to the Court in which they
will ask the Court to award them attorneys’ fees not in excess of 33% of the amount recovered
in the Settlement and actual case expenses incurred. Fees and expenses awarded by the Court
will be deducted from the Settlement Amount. The fee and expense request will be posted to
www.berdonclaims.com at least four weeks prior to the date of the Settlement Fairness Hearing
(or by May 6, 2013).
WHAT WILL THE PLAINTIFF GET?
Plaintiffs will share in the allocation of the money paid to the Plan on the same basis
and to the same extent as all other members of the Settlement Class. In addition, Plaintiffs’
Counsel will petition the Court for a case contribution award for Plaintiffs in recognition of
their efforts in prosecuting this action on behalf of the Settlement Class. None of the
Defendants will share in this allocation.
BASIC INFORMATION
1. Why did I get this Notice package?
This notice was sent to participants in or beneficiaries of the Plan at any time between
November 1, 2007 and April 23, 2009, whose Plan accounts included investments in the IGT
Stock Fund during that time. The Court ordered this Notice to be sent to you because, if you fall
within that group, you have a right to know about the Settlement and about all of your options
before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the
Settlement, and after any objections and appeals are resolved, the net amount of the Settlement
Fund will be paid to the Plan and then allocated among authorized members of the Settlement
Class according to a Court-approved Plan of Allocation. Not all members of the Class will
receive a distribution from the Settlement Fund. This Notice package describes the Action, the
Settlement, your legal rights, the benefits available, who is eligible for them, and how to get
them.
2. What is the Action about and what has happened?
The case was initiated when, on October 2, 2009, plaintiffs filed the action captioned
Carr, et. al. v. International Game Technology, et al., 3:09-cv-00584-RCJ-WGC (the “Carr
Action”). On that same day, other plaintiffs filed the action captioned Jordan, et al. v.
International Game Technology, et al., 3:09-cv-00585-RCJ-WGC (the “Jordan Action”). Both
the Carr Action and the Jordan Action were filed as purported class actions on behalf of a
putative class of participants in and beneficiaries of the Plan, and whose accounts included
investments in IGT common stock.
On October 13, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a motion to consolidate the Carr Action and the
Jordan Action, and requested the Court appoint Plaintiffs as interim co-lead plaintiffs and their
counsel as interim co-lead counsel (the “Consolidation Motion”). On February 8, 2010, the
Court granted the Consolidation Motion. Accordingly, the Carr Action and the Jordan Action
are collectively referred to herein as the “Consolidated Action.”
On March 10, 2010, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Class Action Complaint for
Violations of the ERISA (the “Complaint”) on behalf of a putative class of participants in and
beneficiaries of the Plan at any time between November 1, 2007 and April 23, 2009, and whose
account included investments in IGT common stock. The Complaint alleges that a portion of
Plaintiffs and the purported Class’ Plan accounts’ assets were held in the IGT Stock Fund (the
“Fund”). Plaintiffs are pursuing fiduciary duty breach allegations on behalf of the Plan against
Defendants, as defined supra, which include IGT, the IGT Profit Sharing Plan Committee (the
“Committee”), and individuals whom Plaintiffs allege were Plan fiduciaries for purchasing and
holding IGT stock inside the Plan when it allegedly was not a prudent investment for retirement
purposes. Plaintiffs allege that, in violation of Defendants’ fiduciary duties, they and the Plan’s
other participants were not provided with timely, accurate and complete information concerning
various aspects of the Company’s business and operations.
After full briefing by the Parties and oral argument thereon, on March 16, 2011, the Court
issued a Motion to Dismiss Order (the “MTD Order”) granting in part and denying in part
Defendants’ motions to dismiss and denying Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Among other things, the MTD Order dismissed Plaintiffs’ allegations concerning alleged
breaches related to the imprudent investment of Plan assets, but denied the motion to dismiss
with respect to Plaintiffs’ allegations concerning alleged breaches for failure to disclose material
facts regarding the Plan. Defendants IGT, Thomas J. Matthews, Robert A. Bittman, Richard R.
Burt, Patti S. Hart, Leslie S. Heisz, Robert A. Mathewson, Robert Miller, David E. Roberson,
Philip G. Satre, the Committee, and David D. Johnson filed their Answer to the Consolidated
Complaint on April 6, 2011. Prior to filing their Answer, on March 28, 2011, Defendants filed a
Motion to Amend [the MTD Order] and Certify Interlocutory Appeal, which, after full briefing
thereon, was denied on July 1, 2011. Plaintiffs and Defendants are collectively referred to herein
as the “Parties”.
After the MTD Order was issued, the parties engaged in extensive factual discovery,
including (i) inspecting, reviewing and analyzing over 50,000 pages of documents produced
during discovery, as well as publicly available documents, including but not limited to news
articles, related complaints, press releases, analyst reports and regulatory filings; (ii) researching
the applicable law with respect to the claims asserted and the potential defenses thereto; (iii)
serving and/or responding to multiple sets of written discovery, including requests for
production, interrogatories, requests for admissions, and third-party subpoenas; (iv) taking and/or
defending six party-related depositions; and (v) analyzing in detail the Plan’s purchases and
holdings of IGT stock in light of discovery ascertained in an effort to evaluate the issue of
damages.
Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification on June 14, 2011 (the “Class
Certification Motion”). After full briefing thereon, on March 16, 2012, the Court issued an
Order denying the Class Certification Motion (the “Class Certification Order”). In response, on
April 13, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Reconsideration of the Court’s Denial of
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (the “Reconsideration Motion”). On November 9,
2012, the Parties filed a Joint Notice of Pendency of Settlement.
3. Why is there a Settlement?
No final decision has been reached with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants.
Defendants deny any wrongdoing, and, in connection with the Settlement, do not admit that
they breached any fiduciary duties or otherwise are liable. Plaintiffs and Defendants have
agreed to a Settlement. In reaching the Settlement, they have avoided the cost, risks, time and
disruption of prolonged litigation and trial.
Plaintiffs’ Counsel believes that the Settlement is the best option for the Settlement
Class. The reasons they believe this to be so are described above in the section entitled
“Statement of Potential Outcome of the Action.”
WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT
To see if any of the proceeds of this Settlement will be allocated to you, you first must
determine whether you are a member of the Settlement Class.
4. How do I know whether I am part of the Settlement?
For settlement purposes, the Court has conditionally certified that this Settlement shall
proceed on behalf of everyone who, subject to certain exceptions identified below, fits the
following description:
All persons who were participants in or beneficiaries of the Plan at any time
between November 1, 2007, through and including April 23, 2009, and whose
individual Plan accounts included investments in the IGT Stock Fund at any time
between November 1, 2007 through and including April 23, 2009, excluding
Defendants and their immediate family members.
Not all Members of the Settlement Class will receive a distribution. A Plan of Allocation
to be approved by the Court will determine whether and how much each individual distribution
will be based upon prorated losses.
5. Are there exceptions to being included?
All participants in the Plan described above during the time period described above and
whose accounts included investments in IGT common stock are members of the Settlement Class
with the exception of Defendants and their immediate family members.
THE SETTLEMENT
6. What does the Settlement provide?
IGT shall deposit Five Hundred Thousand U.S. Dollars ($500,000.00) (the “Settlement
Amount”) into an escrow account (the “Escrow Account”) at a financial institution (the “Escrow
Agent”) identified by Plaintiffs’ Counsel within the time period designated in the Stipulation.
The net amount in the Escrow Account, after payment of Court-approved attorney’s fees and
expenses, the case contribution award and other administrative expenses associated with the
Settlement (the “Net Settlement Fund”), will be allocated to members of the Settlement Class
according to a Plan of Allocation to be approved by the Court if and when the Court enters an
order finally approving the Settlement.
As set forth in the Stipulation, all Members of the Settlement Class and anyone claiming
through them shall be deemed to fully release the Defendants and the Releasees from all
Released Claims and shall forever be enjoined from prosecution of Defendants and other
Releasees for any and all Released Claims.
7. How much will an individual payment be?
We do not know yet what your payment will be. Individual calculation cannot be done
until the Court has approved a formula for calculations. Under the proposed Plan of Allocation
(which is subject to the Court’s approval), your share of the Net Settlement Fund will depend
on the investment in IGT common stock in your Plan account during the Class Period. Each
member of the Settlement Class’s share of the Net Settlement Fund will be determined
according to the following formula:
A.Your Settlement Net Loss Is Calculated
For the purpose of the allocation methodology, your Settlement Net Loss is calculated
as follows:
Settlement Net Loss = A + B - C - D, where, for each Settlement Class Member’s
account:
A = the dollar value, if any, of the balance invested in the IGT Stock Fund at the
close of trading on October 31, 2007;
B = the dollar value, if any, of all new investments in the IGT Stock Fund during
the Class Period valued at the time of the transaction(s);
C = the dollar value, if any, of all dispositions of shares of the IGT Stock Fund
during the Class Period valued at the time of the transaction(s); and
D = the dollar value, if any, of the balance invested in the IGT Stock Fund at the
close of trading on April 23, 2009.
B.
Your Settlement Net Loss Percentage Is Calculated
The Settlement Net Losses of each Settlement Class Member as calculated in Section A
will be totaled to yield the loss of the Plan over the Class Period (the “Plan’s Loss”). Your
Settlement Net Loss Percentage will be determined by dividing your Settlement Net Loss by
the Plan’s Loss.
C.
Your Share of the Net Settlement Amount Is Calculated
Your Settlement Net Loss percentage will determine the dollar value of your share, if
any, of the Net Settlement Fund. Your share will be your Settlement Net Loss percentage
multiplied by the Net Settlement Fund. If the dollar value of your share of the Net Settlement
Fund is below $25 (the “De Minimis Amount”), you will not receive any payment. The share
that would have been allocated to you will instead be added back into the Net Settlement Fund.
Those who do receive a portion of the Net Settlement Fund will receive no less than the De
Minimis Amount, or $25.
The Court will be asked to approve the Plan of Allocation, a copy of which is available
along with other settlement documents at www.berdonclaims.com. To the extent that
Defendants were participants in the Plan at any time during the Class Period, they will be
excluded from the Plan of Allocation. No Defendant is entitled to a share of the Settlement.
Your share of the Net Settlement Fund likely will be less than the decrease in the value
of the IGT stock held in your Plan account during the Class Period. You are not responsible
for calculating the amount you may be entitled to receive under the Settlement. This
calculation will be done as part of the implementation of the Settlement, and will be based upon
the Plan’s records, so no information is required from you.
Do not worry if you do not have records concerning your Plan account. If you are
entitled to a share of the Net Settlement Fund, you will receive a statement from the Settlement
Administrator showing the amount of your share. If you have questions regarding the
Settlement or the Plan of Allocation, please contact Plaintiffs’ Counsel, who are listed on page
3 of this notice.
8. How can I get a payment?
You do not need to file a claim for recovery.
If you are a current participant in the Plan and are authorized to receive a payment, it
will be deposited into your Plan account in the manner you designate for Plan contributions. If
you are a member of the Settlement Class and no longer are a participant in the Plan, your
Settlement proceeds will be deposited into a newly-established account for you with the
applicable Plan or sent to you in the form of a check. If you are no longer a participant in the
Plan and a new account is opened for you, any applicable allocation will be invested in the
default investment vehicle under the Plan. In all cases, the initial investment, any subsequent
changes in the investment by Members of the Settlement Class, and any withdrawals of the
investment from the Plan will be governed by the terms of the Plan.
If you change your address between receiving this notice and receiving a
distribution, please advise Plaintiffs’ Counsel so your distribution can be sent to you.
9. When will payments be made?
The Net Settlement Fund will be allocated to members of the Settlement Class pursuant
to the Plan of Allocation as soon as practicable after final approval has been obtained for the
Settlement (which includes exhaustion of any appeals). Any appeal of the final approval may
take a year or more. Please be patient.
There Will Be No Payments If The Settlement Is Terminated
The Stipulation may be terminated on several grounds, including, among others: (1) if
the Court does not approve the Settlement or materially modifies it without the Parties’ consent
before such date; or (2) if the Court’s order approving the Settlement is reversed or modified on
appeal. The Stipulation describes in detail the conditions under which the Settlement may be
terminated. The Defendants may also choose to terminate the Settlement if an Independent
Fiduciary does not agree with the terms of the Settlement. In the event any of these conditions
occur, there will be no settlement payment made, and the Action will resume.
PARTICIPATION IN THE SETTLEMENT
10. Can I exclude myself from the Settlement?
In some class actions, class members have the opportunity to exclude themselves from
the Settlement. This is sometimes referred to as “opting out” of the Settlement. Because of
the way ERISA operates, you do NOT have the right to exclude yourself from the
Settlement in this case. The case was preliminarily certified for settlement purposes only
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(1) as a “non-opt-out” class. Breach of fiduciary
duty claims must be brought by participants on behalf of a plan, and any judgment or resolution
necessarily applies to all participants and beneficiaries in the Plan. As such, it is not possible
for any participants or beneficiaries to exclude themselves from the benefits of the Settlement.
Therefore, you will be bound by any judgments or orders that are entered in this Action,
and, if the Settlement is approved, you will be deemed to have released Defendants and
certain related parties from any and all claims that were or could have been asserted in
the Action on your behalf or on behalf of the Plan, or all claims that were otherwise
included in the release in the Settlement, other than your right to obtain the relief
provided to you, if any, by the Settlement.
Although you cannot opt out of the Settlement, you can object to the Settlement and ask
the Court not to approve the Settlement. See the section entitled “How do I tell the Court that I
don’t like the Settlement?” below.
THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU
11. Do I have a lawyer in the case?
The Court has preliminarily designated Gainey & McKenna and Stull, Stull & Brody as
Plaintiffs’ Counsel for the Settlement Class. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer,
you may hire one at your own expense.
12. How will the lawyers be paid?
Plaintiffs’ Counsel has pursued this action on a contingent basis and will file a motion
for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses. This motion will be considered at the Settlement
Fairness Hearing. As previously described, Plaintiffs’ Counsel will seek attorneys’ fees and
expenses not in excess of 33% of the Settlement Fund. Fees and expenses awarded by the
Court will be deducted from the Settlement Amount.
OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT OR THE ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
You can tell the Court that you do not agree with the Settlement or some part of it.
13. How do I tell the Court that I don’t like the Settlement?
If you are a member of the Settlement Class, you can object to the Settlement if you do
not like any part of it. You can give reasons why you think the Court should not approve the
Settlement. The Court will consider your views. To object, you must send a letter or other
written filing providing proof or otherwise affirming that you are a member of the Settlement
Class and saying that you object to the Settlement. Be sure to include the following case
caption and notation: “Carr v. International Game Tech., Case No. 3:09-cv-00584-RCJ-WGC.”
In addition, your objection must also include your name, address, telephone number, signature,
and the reasons you object to the Settlement. Mail the objection to each of the addresses
identified below postmarked no later than May 20, 2013. You must mail your objection
by this date. If you fail to do so, the Court may not consider your objections. Again, all
papers submitted must include Case No. 3:09-cv-00584-RCJ-WGC on the front page.
The Court
Clerk of the Court
Daniel Patrick
Moynihan
U.S. Courthouse
400 South Virginia
Street, Reno,
Nevada 89501
Plaintiffs’ Counsel
Thomas J. McKenna
GAINEY & McKENNA
440 Park Avenue South, 5th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Email:
tjmckenna@gaineyandmckenna.com
Defendants’ Counsel
Boris Feldman
Diane Walters
WILSON SONSINI
GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Email: boris.feldman@wsgr.com
Michael J. Klein
STULL, STULL & BRODY
6 East 45th Street
New York, NY 10017
Tel: (212) 687-7230
E-mail: mklein@ssbny.com
THE COURT’S SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING
The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the Settlement. You may
attend and you may ask to speak, but it is not necessary.
14.When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement?
The Court will hold a Settlement Fairness Hearing to decide whether to approve the
Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate. You may attend the Settlement Fairness Hearing,
and you may ask to speak, but you do not have to attend. The Court has scheduled the
Settlement Fairness Hearing for June 3, 2013 at 9 a.m. in 400 South Virginia Street, Reno,
Nevada 89501. Please check the settlement website for updates as to the time or place of the
hearing if you plan to attend, as the Court may change the date or location of the hearing. At
the hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. If
there are objections, the Court will consider them as well. After the Settlement Fairness
Hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the Settlement. The Court will also rule on
the motions for attorneys’ fees and expenses and the case contribution award.
15. Do I have to come to the Settlement Fairness Hearing?
No, but you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you
do not have to come to Court to voice your objection. As long as you mail your written
objection on time, the Court will consider it when determining whether to approve the
Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate. You also may pay your own lawyer to attend the
Settlement Fairness Hearing, but attendance is not necessary.
16. May I speak at the Settlement Fairness Hearing?
If you are a member of the Settlement Class, you may ask the Court for permission to
speak at the Settlement Fairness Hearing. To do so, you must send a letter or other paper called
a “Notice of Intention to Appear at Settlement Fairness Hearing in Carr v. International Game
Tech., Case No. 3:09-cv-00584-RCJ-WGC” to the Clerk of Court, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and
Defendants’ counsel at the addresses listed above. Be sure to include your name, address,
telephone number, and your signature. Your Notice of Intention to Appear must be postmarked
no later than May 20, 2013.
IF YOU DO NOTHING
17. What happens if I do nothing at all?
If you do nothing and you are a member of the Settlement Class, you will participate in
the Settlement of the Action as described above in this Notice if the Settlement is approved,
and you will receive your entitlement, if any, under the Plan of Allocation.
GETTING MORE INFORMATION
18. Are there more details about the Settlement?
This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. The complete Settlement is set forth
in the Stipulation. You may obtain a copy of the Stipulation by making a written request to
Plaintiffs’ Counsel listed on page 3 above.
Copies may also be obtained at
www.berdonclaims.com.
19. How do I get more information?
You can contact Plaintiffs’ Counsel listed on page _ above, or visit
www.berdonclaims.com for more information regarding the Settlement. Moreover, Plaintiffs’
Counsel may be contacted via e-mail at: tjmckenna@gaineyandmckenna.com or
mklein@ssbny.com.
Dated: _____________________
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
