Neel v. Benedetti et al, No. 3:2009cv00105 - Document 24 (D. Nev. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Petitioner has not responded to the Court's prior order 23 . The order directed petitioner to show cause in writing why the sole ground remaining, Ground 5, should not be dismissed with prejudice on the merits and why a final judgment of dismissal should not be entered. IT IS ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice on the merits as to the sole ground remaining. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 1/23/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Neel v. Benedetti et al Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 WILLIAM URAL NEEL, 9 Petitioner, 3:09-cv-00105-ECR-VPC 10 vs. ORDER 11 12 13 JIM BENEDETTI, et al., Respondents. 14 15 Petitioner has not responded to the Court’s prior order (#23). The order directed 16 petitioner to show cause in writing why the sole ground remaining, Ground 5, should not be 17 dismissed with prejudice on the merits and why a final judgment of dismissal should not be 18 entered. Petitioner has not responded to the show cause order, which set forth at length the 19 grounds for dismissal. 20 21 22 23 24 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice on the merits as to the sole ground remaining. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 23, 2012. 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ EDWARD C. REED United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
