JOYNER v. INDIAN HILLS GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT et al

Filing 19

ORDER approving 18 parties' Stipulation to submit and/or file settlement documents on or before Friday, 4/3/2009. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/24/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 TH O R N D A L , AR M S T R O N G , DE L K , BA L K E N B U S H & EISIN G E R 6590 S. McCarran, Suite B Reno, Nevada 89509 (775) 786-2882 Brent T. Kolvet, Esq. State Bar No. 1597 Thorndal, Armstrong, Delk, Balkenbush & Eisinger 6590 S. McCarran, Suite B Reno, Nevada 89509 Attorneys for Defendants INDIAN HILLS GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, ART BAER and SANDI EISLE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JOSH JOYNER, an individual, Plaintiff vs. INDIAN HILLS GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; ART BAER, an individual; and SANDI EISELE, an individual, Defendants. ____________________________________/ CASE NO. 3:08-CV-00552-LRH-RAM STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE and/or SUBMIT SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTS COME NOW Plaintiff, JOSH JOYNER, and Defendants, INDIAN HILLS GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, ART BAER and SANDI EISLE, by and through their respective counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time to submit and/or file settlement documents concerning the above-referenced matter through and including Friday, April 3, 2009. DATED: March 20, 2009 DATED: March 20, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY DICKERSON By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Dickerson Jeffrey A. Dickerson, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Josh Joyner THORNDAL, ARMSTRONG, DELK, BALKENBUSH & EISINGER By: /s/ Brent T. Kolvet Brent T. Kolvet, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants 24th day of March, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of __________________, 2009. _______________________________ DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ____________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?