Putzer v. Herndon et al, No. 3:2007cv00498 - Document 108 (D. Nev. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER. The Magistrate Judge's 65 Order will be sustained and plaintiff's 67 motion is denied . Plaintiff's 100 motion to "direct the entry of a final judgment as to Notice of Appeal dated 12/30/2008, filed". The Magistrate Judge's rulings are purely interlocutory and there have been no dismissals of any claims and no showing of grounds which would warrant an interlocutory appeal. Plaintiff's 100 motion is denied . IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 09/11/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FIED LF RFGEIFD I/ ENTE: 9 1E I . jE'c%0L n k r1i I b C t1 E.2hC. I ' r hi 01S LF IS' n u ) ' Z J ia K F o 1 2 651 1 1 279 5 . t 0 3 4 CLE tCfr;LI C :JS RK 1 )(CRCT LET J F Y: . r L' :i(TCv1u.a' 'e Fl ; ' ''h -o J . 'J ' . -. - L .ys )-,../ .. F-( .su- . - .. - 5 6 UNI TED STA TES D I STRI COU RT CT 7 DISTRI OF N EV AD A CT 8 ***?* 9 DAVI PUTZER, D 1 0 PI nif aitf, 11 vs . 1 GLEN W HORTON,e a . 2 t l, 1 3 De en s f dant. ) ) 3: c 00498LRH07-vRAM ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) 14 1 5 Beor t couti Pli ifsNotc olAppe l(/ ) whi t c twilte tasa f e he r s antf ie a /67 , ch he our l ra 1 ob e tont t M a srt sOr r(/ . 6 j ci o he gitae' de /65) 1 7 The Cour hascon t d isr vi i t sca e ha f l cons de e t Pl ntf s t duc e t e ew n hi s , s uly i r d he ai if l o j ci n, n ote rlv n matr o e od pu s a t 2 U. C. 6 6( )( ) a d 8 b e to a d h r ee a t te s frc r ru nto 8 S. j 3 b 1, n 1 c l est tt M a s r t J 9 onc ud ha he git a e udge' r i g wasne t rc ea l e r s uln ihe l ry r oneousno c t a y t l w . r on r r o a Putzer v. Herndon et al 20 Regi H e i ks snam e s l be i ere i Pl i if s c pl i i t pl c ofdef nt na ndr c on' ha l ns t d n a ntf om a nt n he a c enda Doc. 108 21 J hn Doe #2. The M ag sr t J ge d ed apr ed a o itae ud eni opos mendme t t Req s f Re ifi nt o he ue t or le n 22 Pî i if' c pl f . Thi c r s t nst M ag s r t sr i bec us t r que t a ntf s om a nt s ou t usai he i ta e' ulng a e he e s ed 23 modii a i wo d ber unda t s rl fc tons ul ed n , upe tuousorbe yond a r ifa ia e unde t lw. ny ele val bl r he a 24 TheM a srt J gitae udge' Or (/ wilt rf e, s ti a Plitf smoton s der /65) l,heeor be usaned nd anif i 25 (/ i de e /67) s nid. 26 Alobeor t c ti Pli itsmotont 'die tt e l ofafna j me a t s f e he our s antf' i o i re he nty ' i l udg nt s o 27 Notc o Appe dae De embe 30, ,tld'(/ 00) Defnda s opposton(/02)a ie f al td c r 2008 ie '/1 , e nt' ii /1 nd 28 Pl ntf srpl ( 04) TheM a sr eJ ai if e y #1 . gitat udge' r i a epur yi el utr a t r hav s ulngs r el ntroc oy nd hce e Dockets.Justia.com 1 be no di m i s l ofan cl i s a no s w i ofgr en s sas y a m nd ho ng oundsw hi woul wa r n a eh d ra t n i eroc or appe .Plitf smoton( 00)i de e nt l ut y al anif i #1 s nid. 3 I I SO O RDERED. T S D A TED t s 11hda ofSe e be , hi t y pt m r 2009. % LA RRY R.HI KS C UN I TED STA TES DI STRI J D GE CT U 22 23 24 25 26 28
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
