Kevin Fernandez Vs. State of Nevada, et al.

Filing 278

ORDER denying as moot 156 Plaintiff's Motion for TRO and denying as moot 157 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/16/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the court are Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (#156) and Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction (#157). The Government responded (#166/167), and Plaintiff replied (#185). Plaintiff is seeking an emergency motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent the Government from applying the provisions of Nev. Rev. Stat. 213.1214 to him. Plaintiff was scheduled to go before the Psychological Review Panel on November 17, 2008. Plaintiff was informed on September 28, 2008, that he would be seen in absentia by the Parole Board on October 8, 2008. Plaintiff received notice on October 23, 2008, that he had been denied parole until July 1, 2011. Plaintiff was removed from the November 17, 2008, Psychological Review Panel Agenda by Dr. Schofield on November 3, 2008, because Plaintiff had already been denied parole making an evaluation by the Psychological Review Panel unnecessary. /// /// vs. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants. KEVIN FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ***** ) ) 3:06-cv-00628-LRH-RAM ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff's emergency motions for temporary restraining order (#156) and preliminary injunction (#157) are denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 16th day of March, 2009. LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?