Kevin Fernandez Vs. State of Nevada, et al.
Filing
276
ORDER sustaining Magistrate Judge's rulings contained in 35 Order re 11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and 13 MOTION to Stay and denying 41 Plaintiff's MOTION for District Judge to Reconsider Order. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/13/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Before this Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Review and Objections to Magistrate's Decision (#41), Defendants filed their response (#44) and Plaintiff replied (#50). Plaintiff's motion challenges the Magistrate Judge's denial of Plaintiff's motion for injunction (#11) and Plaintiff's motion to stay pending appeal (#13). The court will treat the Magistrate's Minute Order (#35) as a Report and Recommendation relative to the typewriter and pseudonym issues, Plaintiff's motions #11 and #13. The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The court determines that the Magistrate's rulings contained within its Minute Order (#35) entered on January 8, 2008, should be adopted and accepted. /// /// /// /// KEVIN FERNANDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ***** ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF NEVADA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ )
3:06-cv-00628-LRH-RAM ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's rulings contained within its Minute Order (#35) entered on January 8, 2008, are sustained and Plaintiff's motion and objections (#41) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of March, 2009.
_______________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
