Kevin Fernandez Vs. State of Nevada, et al.
Filing
275
ORDER denying 62 Plaintiff's Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order re 59 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/13/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Review and Objections to Magistrate's Decision (#621) regarding Magistrate Judge McQuaid's Order (#59) denying Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of counsel (#55) which the court will treat as a motion to reconsider Magistrate's Order (#55). Defendants have responded (#66) and Plaintiff has replied (#74). The Court has conducted its review in this case, has fully considered the Plaintiff's motion, and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1). The Magistrate Judge's ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Moreover, this court agrees with the Magistrate's order upon the same grounds and rationale as set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Order (#59). The Magistrate Judge's Order (#59) will, therefore, be sustained and Plaintiff's motion (#62) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of March, 2009. vs. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants. KEVIN FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ***** ) ) 3:06-cv-00628-LRH-RAM ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) )
1
Refers to this court's docket number.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
