Allinger v. McDaniel et al
Filing
106
ORDER sustaining 100 Magistrate's Order and denying Plaintiff's objections to Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendations 103 . Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/4/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ***** JOHN MICHAEL ALLINGER, Plaintiff, vs. E. K. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants. ) ) 3:06-cv-00139-LRH-VPC ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) )
Before the court is Plaintiff's Objections to Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendations (#1031), which the court will treat as a motion to reconsider Magistrate's Order (#100). Defendants responded on January 22, 2009 (#104). The Court has conducted its review in this case, has fully considered the Plaintiff's motion, and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), and concludes that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The Magistrate Judge's Order (#100) will, therefore, be sustained and Plaintiff's motion (#103) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 4th day of March, 2009.
LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Refers to this court's docket number.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
