Losey v. Best Buy Co., Inc., No. 2:2023cv01958 - Document 12 (D. Nev. 2024)
Court Description: ORDER Granting 11 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 1/16/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Losey v. Best Buy Co., Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Doc. 12 SPO Jack P. Burden, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 6918 Dallin Knecht, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 16263 BACKUS | BURDEN 3050 South Durango Drive Las Vegas, NV 89117 (702) 872-5555 (702) 872-5545 jburden@backuslaw.com dallinknecht@backuslaw.com Attorneys for Defendant, Best Buy Co., Inc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 DAVID LOSEY, individually, Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 BEST BUY CO. INC, a foreign corporation; and DOES 1 through 100; and ROE CORPORATIONS 101 through 200, Defendants. 17 ) Case 2:23-cv-01958-JAD-BNW ) ) ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 19 Defendant Best Buy Co., Inc., (hereinafter “Defendant”) seeks to disclose documents that 20 may involve trade secrets, confidential research, proprietary materials, and development and/or 21 commercial information belonging to Defendant. 22 Defendant will provide these documents for inspection, review, and copying only under a 23 Protective Order upon the hereinafter stated terms and conditions. 24 25 26 27 28 All the parties are in agreement as to the terms of the said Protective Order; therefore, ... ... ... ... Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant will disclose documents that it designates “Confidential and Proprietary” (meaning they may involve trade secrets, confidential research, proprietary research, proprietary materials and/or development and/or commercial information) to the parties to this suit and their attorneys, only pursuant to this Order and under the conditions that follow. With respect to said documents being designated as “Confidential and Proprietary,” Defendant bears the burden of showing good cause why the document contains information which may be set forth in a log and/or set forth in Defendant’s disclosure of documents. In designating information or items marked for protection under this Order, Defendant must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 2. Any and all of the aforesaid material disclosed by Defendant and the contents thereof shall be maintained in confidence by counsel for Plaintiff. After their production, the aforesaid materials shall maintain protection and must fully comply with the provisions below. 14 3. Any and all of the aforesaid materials disclosed by Defendant and the contents thereof 15 shall be used only in connection with the above-captioned matter and shall not be used for any 16 other purpose whatsoever. 17 4. No person who examines any document produced pursuant to this Order shall disseminate 18 orally, in writing, or by any other means, the document(s) of the information contained therein, to 19 any other person not also authorized to examine documents under the terms of this order. Persons 20 authorized to examine documents include counsel, counsel’s staff, the parties, and experts. 21 5. Counsel for Plaintiff may permit Plaintiff or any expert(s) or consultant(s) hired by 22 Plaintiff to review the documents subject to this Protective Order, but counsel for Plaintiff must 23 first obtain from Plaintiff’s said expert(s) and/or consultant(s) a written statement confirming 24 their agreement to comply with every element of this Protective order. A copy of this Non- 25 Disclosure Agreement is attached hereto at Exhibit A. Plaintiff and said experts shall agree that 26 the documents and the contents thereof shall not be disclosed to any other person or entity and 27 said documents shall not be photocopied or reproduced by any means, except for use in 28 association with this lawsuit. Any documents provided to experts or consultants must be returned 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 to counsel for Defendant or destroyed within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of the abovecaptioned litigation pursuant to the terms of paragraph 9 below. Both consulting and testifying experts may review the documents in accordance with the terms of this paragraph, which paragraph does not alter the applicable disclosure requirements and/or privileges. 6. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, this Order shall be without prejudice to the right of any party to challenge the propriety of discovery on any grounds, including but not limited to, relevance, privilege, and materiality. 7. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, this Order shall not restrict in any manner the right of any party to offer or use as evidence at the trial of this action any of the documents subject to this Protective Order, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of any objection which might be raised as to the admissibility of any evidentiary material. 8. If a party challenges the designation of any disclosure marked “Confidential and 13 Proprietary” pursuant to this Protective Order, the challenging party shall provide the designating 14 party written notice of any such challenge and shall identify in such notice the bates number of 15 the documents and/or the deposition transcript at issue. The parties shall make good faith efforts 16 to resolve the dispute. The party defending the designation shall have the burden of 17 demonstrating to the Court that the designation is proper under this Protective Order. If an 18 agreement is not reached, counsel for the designating party will file a motion to preserve the 19 confidentiality designation. The burden of proof to demonstrate confidential treatment of any 20 information at all times remains with the designating party. The confidential information in 21 controversy shall not be disclosed or declassified until required by the Court upon written order, 22 or as agreed in writing by the party who designated the information. If the Court determines that 23 the designation or challenge to such designation was made in bad faith, it may award sanctions. 24 9. At the conclusion of this lawsuit by settlement, a jury verdict, nonsuit, dismissal by judicial 25 order or otherwise, upon request of Defendant, all Defendant’s materials and documents, 26 including any and all copies, or renditions made from the materials, must be returned to counsel 27 for Defendant or destroyed within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of the above captioned 28 litigation. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10. The parties shall separately confer regarding the use of Confidential Material at trial and at any hearing, and to the extent an agreement cannot be reached, the Court shall intervene. A party seeking to file a confidential document, with any appropriate redactions, under seal must file a motion to seal and must comply with the Court’s directives in Kamakana v. City of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) and Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Association, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010). Documents must be filed under seal using the Court’s electronic filing procedures. See Local Rule IA 10-5. Papers filed with the Court under seal must be accompanied with a concurrently filed motion for leave to file those documents under seal. See Local Rule IA 10-5(a). 11. The parties understand that the Court will maintain the Confidential Material it receives pursuant to paragraph 9 above under seal in accordance with the local and governing laws and rules. 12 12. A breach of the terms of this Order shall entitle counsel for Defendant to appropriate 13 sanctions, including but not limited to attorney’s fees and costs incurred in the enforcement of 14 this Order. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED and agreed as to the terms and conditions of this Protective Order. 17 18 19 20 21 22 /s/ Ryan Kerbow Ryan Kerbow, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 11403 HIGH STAKES INJURY LAW 320 South Jones Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Dallin Knecht Jack P. Burden, Esq. Dallin Knecht, Esq. Backus | Burden 3050 S. Durango Dr. Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Attorneys for Defendants 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: 1.16.2024 26 27 _____________________ 28 United States Magistrate Judge 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 EXHIBIT A Non-Disclosure Agreement 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 CASE NO. 2:23-CV-01958-JAD-BNW 3 4 NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 5 I, ______________________________ (Print Name), being of full age, certify that I have read the 6 Stipulated Protective Order entered in the case entitled, David Losey v. Best Buy Co., Inc., having Case 7 No. 2:23-cv-01958-JAD-BNW, filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court in and for Clark County, 8 Nevada, currently sitting in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and agree to be 9 bound by its terms; to maintain that information designated as “Confidential and Proprietary” in 10 confidence; not to use or disclose information designated as “Confidential and Proprietary” to anyone 11 other than counsel for the parties involved in the action, parties involved in the action or any other expert 12 or consultant that has also executed the Non-Disclosure Agreement; and not to use any documents or 13 information protected by the Stipulated Protective Order except in connection with this case, provided 14 that nothing shall prevent disclosure beyond the terms of this Order if the party claiming confidentiality 15 consents in writing prior to disclosure. 16 I understand that any documents provided to me must be returned to counsel for Defendant or 17 destroyed, within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of the above-captioned litigation pursuant to the terms 18 of Paragraph 9 of the Stipulated Protective Order. 19 20 21 22 To effectuate my compliance with this Order, I further submit myself to the personal and subject matter jurisdiction of the United States District Court in and for the District of Nevada, in this action. I certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the foregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment. 23 24 25 26 27 ______________________ Signature _______________________ Print Name 28 6
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
