Giuffre v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation Inc, No. 2:2023cv01483 - Document 23 (D. Nev. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER granting 20 Stipulation; answer to 1 Complaint due 45 days after ruling on consolidation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 10/12/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Giuffre v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation Inc Doc. 23 Case 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 10/12/23 Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Adam Hosmer-Henner (NSBN 12779) Chelsea Latino (NSBN 14227) Jane Susskind (NSBN 15099) McDONALD CARANO LLP 100 West Liberty Street, Tenth Floor Reno, Nevada 89501 (775) 788-2000 ahosmerhenner@mcdonaldcarano.com clatino@mcdonaldcarano.com jsusskind@mcdonaldcarano.com LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Serrin Turner (pro hac vice to be filed) Marissa Alter-Nelson (pro hac vice to be filed) 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10022-4834 (212) 906-1200 serrin.turner@lw.com marissa.alter-nelson@lw.com Sean M. Berkowitz (pro hac vice to be filed) 330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60611 (312) 876-7700 sean.berkowitz@lw.com Attorneys for Defendant Caesars Entertainment, Inc. [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 19 20 MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 21 Plaintiffs, 22 v. 23 Caesars Entertainment, Inc., 24 Defendant. Case No. 2:23-cv-01447-ART-BNW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TIME FOR DEFENDANT CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS (FIRST REQUEST) 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 10/12/23 Page 2 of 7 1 2 PAUL GARCIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 3 4 5 v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc., Defendant. 6 7 8 ALEXIS GIUFFRE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 11 v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc., Defendant. 12 13 DAVID LACKEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 Case No. 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW Plaintiffs, 9 10 Case No. 2:23-cv-01482-ART-BNW Case No. 2:23-cv-01562-ART-BNW Plaintiffs, v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc., 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 THOMAS MCNICHOLAS and LAURA MCNICHOLAS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 21 22 v. 23 Caesars Entertainment, Inc., 24 Case No. 3:23-cv-00470-ART-BNW Defendant. 25 26 27 28 2 Case 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 10/12/23 Page 3 of 7 WHEREAS, Rodriguez v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. No. 2:23-cv-01447-ART-BNW, 1 2 was filed on September 15, 2023 (ECF No. 1); WHEREAS, Defendant Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (“Caesars”) was served with the 3 4 Rodriguez complaint on September 21, 2023 (Dkt. 6); WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a), Caesars’s response to the Rodriguez 5 6 Complaint would otherwise be due on or before October 12, 2023; WHEREAS, Garcia v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. No. 2:23-cv-01482-ART-BNW, was 7 8 filed on September 21, 2023 (Dkt. 1); WHEREAS, Caesars was served with the Garcia complaint on September 25, 2023 (Dkt. 9 10 11 12 13 14 7); WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a), Caesars’s response to the Garcia Complaint would otherwise be due on or before October 16, 2023; WHEREAS, Guiffre v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. No. 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW, was filed on September 21, 2023 (Dkt. 1); 15 WHEREAS, Caesars was served with the Garcia complaint on September 25, 2023; 16 WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a), Caesars’s response to the Guiffre 17 18 19 Complaint would otherwise be due on or before October 16, 2023; WHEREAS, McNicholas v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. No. 3:23-cv-00470-ART-BNW, was filed on September 22, 2023 (Dkt. 1); 20 WHEREAS, Caesars was served with the Garcia complaint on September 26, 2023; 21 WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a), Caesars’s response to the Garcia 22 23 24 25 Complaint would otherwise be due on or before October 17, 2023; WHEREAS, Lackey v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. No. 2:23-cv-01562-ART-BNW, was filed on September 29, 2023 (Dkt. 1); WHEREAS, Caesars has yet to be served with the Lackey Complaint; 26 27 28 3 Case 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 10/12/23 Page 4 of 7 1 WHEREAS, on October 4, 2023, the Garica, Guiffre, McNicholas and Lackey complaints 2 were related to the Rodriguez complaint and transferred to the Honorable Anne R. Traum 3 (Rodriguez Dkt. 10) (the “Related Actions”); 4 WHEREAS, on October 5, 2023, counsel for Rodriguez, Garcia, Guiffre, McNicholas and 5 Lackey filed an Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Cases for Pre-Trial Proceedings (Rodriguez 6 Dkt. 11) (the “Motion to Consolidate”); 7 WHEREAS, the Motion to Consolidate provides that all deadlines in all of the Related 8 Actions are to be stayed, and further anticipates the filing of a consolidated complaint and 9 proposed deadline for Caesars to respond to the consolidated complaint; 10 11 WHEREAS, the Court has yet to act on the Motion to Consolidate, and thus Caesars currently faces upcoming response deadlines in the Related Actions in which it has been served; 12 WHEREAS, to avoid unnecessary expenditure of resources and effort responding to 13 individual complaints in the Related Actions where all Parties are agreed that the complaints 14 should first be consolidated, and where the Motion to Consolidate is currently pending before the 15 Court, the Parties have agreed to extend the time for Caesars to respond to the Complaints until 16 forty-five (45) days following the service of a consolidated complaint, as requested in the Motion 17 to Consolidate, or, if the Court denies the Motion to Consolidate, forty-five (45) days after the 18 Court issues such decision. There is good cause to grant this request, which is not made for the 19 purposes of delay. 20 It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED that: 21 1. Defendant shall file and serve any answer or other response within forty-five (45) 22 days of the filing of a consolidated complaint, if the pending Motion to 23 Consolidate is granted. 24 2. If the Motion to Consolidate is not granted, Defendant shall file and serve any 25 answer or other response to the complaints in the Related Actions within forty- 26 five (45) days of the Court’s decision. 27 28 4 Case 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 10/12/23 Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: October 11, 2023. MCDONALD CARANO LLP By: /s/ Adam Hosmer-Henner Adam Hosmer-Henner (NSBN 12779) Chelsea Latino (NSBN 14227) Jane Susskind (NSBN 15099) 100 West Liberty Street, Tenth Floor Reno, Nevada 89501 (775) 788-2000 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Serrin Turner (pro hac vice to be filed) serrin.turner@lw.com Marissa Alter-Nelson (pro hac vice to be filed) marissa.alter-nelson@lw.com 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10022-4834 Telephone: +1.212.906.1200 Sean M. Berkowitz (pro hac vice to be filed) sean.berkowitz@lw.com 330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60611 Tel: +1.312.876.7700 Attorneys for Defendant Caesars Entertainment, Inc. 19 20 LAW OFFICES OF MILES N. CLARK, LLC 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/_Miles N. Clark___________________ Miles N. Clark miles@milesclarklaw.com 5510 S. Fort Apache Rd., Suite 30 Las Vegas, NV 89148-7700 T: (702) 856-7430 F: (702) 552-2370 John A. Yanchunis* jyanchunis@forthepeople.com Ra O. Amen* 5 Case 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 10/12/23 Page 6 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ramen@forthepeople.com MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP 201 North Franklin Street 7th Floor Tampa, Florida 33602 T: (813) 223-5505 F: (813) 223-5402 Michael D. Braun* mdb@kuzykclassactions.com KUZYK LAW, LLP 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 800 Los Angeles, California 90067 T: (213) 401-4100 F: (213) 401-0311 Counsel for Plaintiff Miguel Rodriguez 10 11 12 13 14 15 /s/ David C. O’Mara David C. O’Mara Nevada Bar No. 8599 THE O’MARA LAW FIRM, P.C. 311 E. Liberty Street Reno, Nevada 89501 775.323.1321 david@omaralaw.net 20 Ben Barnow* Anthony L. Parkhill* BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. 205 West Randolph Street, Ste. 1630 Chicago, IL 60606 Tel: (312) 621-2000 b.barnow@barnowlaw.com aparkhill@barnowlaw.com 21 Counsel for Plaintiffs Thomas and Laura McNicholas 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/_Nathan R. Ring______________________ Nathan R. Ring STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC 3100 W. Charleston Boulevard, Suite 208 Las Vegas, NV 89102 Telephone: (725) 235-9750 nring@stranchlaw.com Jeff Ostrow* 6 Case 2:23-cv-01483-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 10/12/23 Page 7 of 7 3 KOPELOWITZ OSTROW FERGUSON WEISELBERG GILBERT One West Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone:954-525-4100 4 Counsel for Plaintiffs Paul Garcia and Alexis Guffrie 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 /s/ Don Springmeyer Don Springmeyer, Esq. (NBN 1021) KEMP JONES, LLP 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, 17th Floor Las Vegas, NV 89169 James J. Pizzirusso* Amanda V. Boltax* HAUSFELD LLP 888 16th Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 Steve N. Nathan* HAUSFELD LLP 33 Whitehall Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10004 Douglas J. McNamara* 18 Brian E. Johnson* COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC 1100 New York Ave, 5th Floor Washington, DC 20005 19 Counsel for Plaintiff David Lackey 17 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED: 22 23 24 25 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: ____________________________ 10/12/2023 26 27 28 7
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
