Garrett Sr. v. Las Vegas Metrolpolitan Police Department, No. 2:2019cv01159 - Document 26 (D. Nev. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER granting 24 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Garrett Sr. v. Las Vegas Metrolpolitan Police Department Doc. 26 Case 2:19-cv-01159-JCM-VCF Document 26 24 Filed 05/15/20 05/11/20 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 E. BRENT BRYSON, LTD. E. BRENT BRYSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 4933 7730 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 109 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 (702) 364-1234 PHONE (702) 364 -1442 FAX Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 ANTHONY GARRETT, SR., Plaintiff, 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 10 vs. 11 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER D. JAPPE, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER J. BERTUCCINI, individually and in his official capacity; SGT. ANDREW PENNUCCI, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER ERNEST MORGAN, individually and in his official capacity; LT. T. MELTON, individually and in his official capacity; DETECTIVE CEASER SEDANO, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER JASON ROSE, individually and in his official capacity; LT. JOSHUA MARTINEZ, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER MICHAEL SANTOYO, individually and in his official capacity; DOE OFFICERS I through X; and ROES XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 2:19-cv-01159-JCM-VCF 22 23 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Officer J. Bertuccini, Sgt. Andrew Pennucci, Officer Ernest Morgan, Lt. T. 25 Melton, Detective Cesar Sedano, Officer Jason Rose, Lt., Joshua Martinez, Officer D. Jappe, 26 27 28 and Officer Michael Santoyo, by and through their attorneys of record, the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing; and Plaintiff, Anthony Garrett, Sr., by and through his attorney of record, E. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:19-cv-01159-JCM-VCF Document 26 24 Filed 05/15/20 05/11/20 Page 2 of 6 1 Brent Bryson, Esq., with the law offices of E. Brent Bryson, Ltd. (collectively “the Parties), that 2 the parties agree as follows : 3 4 1. Any and all claims with respect to the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff Anthony Garrett, Sr., and Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan 5 6 Police Department, Officer J. Bertuccini, Sgt. Andrew Pennucci, Officer Ernest Morgan, Lt. T. 7 Melton, Detective Cesar Sedano, Officer Jason Rose, Lt., Joshuan Martinez, Officer D. Jappe, 8 and Officer Michael Santoyo; and 9 2. Each party will bear its own attorney fees and costs. 10 3. Out of state counsel, Jamon Hicks, Esq. is in agreement with the dismissal and his 11 Motion to Dismiss is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. Plaintiff’s counsel does not believe out of 12 state counsel’s motion is valid for anything more than authorization to dismiss since he was 13 14 never admitted Pro Hac Vice, thus unable to file documents in this case. 15 Dated this 11th day of May, 2020. Dated this 11th day of May, 2020. 16 E. BRENT BRYSON, LTD. MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 17 By: s/E. Brent Bryson__________ E. Brent Bryson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4933 7730 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 109 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Attorney for Plaintiff By: s/Craig R. Anderson________ Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No, 14246 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Attorneys for Defendants 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER 15, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED May this ____ day of ____________________, 2020. 23 24 25 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 2 Case 2:19-cv-01159-JCM-VCF Document 26 24 Filed 05/15/20 05/11/20 Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 EXHIBIT “A” 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case 2:19-cv-01159-JCM-VCF Document 26 24 Filed 05/15/20 05/11/20 Page 4 of 6 Case 2:19-cv-01159-JCM-VCF Document 26 24 Filed 05/15/20 05/11/20 Page 5 of 6 Case 2:19-cv-01159-JCM-VCF Document 26 24 Filed 05/15/20 05/11/20 Page 6 of 6
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
