Wilson v. United States of America et al, No. 2:2018cv01241 - Document 194 (D. Nev. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER Granting 193 Second Amended Joint Pretrial Order. Calendar Call set for 7/5/2023 at 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan. Bench Trial set for 7/10/2023 at 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/9/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)

Download PDF

Wilson v. United States of America et al Doc. 194 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 10 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 BRADLEY S. MAINOR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7434 ASH MARIE BLACKURN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14712 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, NV 89148-5652 Tel: (702) 464-5000 Fax: (702) 463-4440 ash@mwinjury.com Counsel for Plaintiff SONALOLITA WILSON 11 12 13 14 CASE NO.: 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK Plaintiff vs. [PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 COMES NOW Plaintiff, SONALOLITA WILSON (“Plaintiff” or “Wilson”), by and through her attorneys, BRADLEY S. MAINOR, ESQ., and ASH MARIE BLACKBURN, ESQ., of MAINOR WIRTH LLP; and Defendants UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LLC (“USA”), by and through their attorneys, R. THOMAS COLONNA, ESQ., for the UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, and submit this [Proposed] Amended Joint Pretrial Order pursuant to LR 16-3. I. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A. Summary of Action This is a personal injury action arising out of two motor vehicle collisions that occurred on September 1, 2016, between Plaintiff WILSON and Defendant USA and Plaintiff WILSON and DEMHA-SANTIAGO and DEMHA. Plaintiff was traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue, approaching Saylor Avenue, in the eastbound lanes. Plaintiff alleges Nakia McCloud, while in the course and scope of her employment with Defendant USA, in its Department of the Treasury, IRS, Page 1 of 18 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 18 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 1 was also traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue, directly behind Plaintiff. 2 Plaintiff alleges to have stopped in the eastbound travel lane for pedestrians who were 3 crossing Washington Avenue. Plaintiff avers that Nakia McCloud then rear-ended Plaintiff’s 4 vehicle. 5 Following the first collision, Nakia McCloud pulled her vehicle off to the right side of the 6 road. Plaintiff’s vehicle remained in the roadway. As Nakia McCloud was on the phone with 7 emergency services, while Plaintiff sat in her disabled car, her vehicle was struck again by a 8 different vehicle, driven by a dismissed party, DEMHA SANTIAGO. Plaintiff further contends she 9 was injured as a result of the September 1, 2016 motor vehicle collisions. 10 B. 11 Plaintiff seeks past medical specials in an amount in excess of $1,720,662.65. Plaintiff is 12 continuing her medical treatment. She is also seeking the present-day value of future medical 13 expenses in the amount of $386,938.00, loss of earning capacity in the amount of $805,038.85, and 14 past and future pain and suffering. Relief Sought 15 Plaintiff presented claims for future medical specials between $1,504,780.00 and 16 $2,238,876.00 during discovery. Thereafter, Defendant USA filed a Motion to Strike Untimely 17 Disclosure of Plaintiff’s Expert’s Life Care Plan Opinions, which was granted by the Court. 18 C. 19 1. Plaintiff’s Contentions: 20 Plaintiff contends that Defendants were the sole cause of the subject collisions by failing to 21 pay full attention to their surroundings, failing to reduce their speed, and striking the rear of 22 Plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff further contends that the motor vehicle collisions caused her significant 23 injuries and the resulting damages that are the subject of this lawsuit. Contentions of the Parties 24 2. Defendant USA’s Contentions: 25 Defendant USA contends that Plaintiff cannot establish her burden of proof as to causation 26 or damages (if any) as to the USA in the first accident. 27 28 Page 2 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 3 of 18 1 II. 2 Statement of Jurisdiction 3 As against the United States, this Court has exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 4 §1346(b)(1), which provides that federal courts “shall have exclusive jurisdiction of civil actions 5 on claims against the United States… for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death 6 caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while 7 acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, 8 if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where 9 the act or omission occurred.” MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 III. 11 The following facts are admitted by the parties and require no proof: 12 1. Nakia McCloud was an employee of the Department of the Treasury, IRS, on 13 September 1, 2016 and she was acting within the course and scope of her employment 14 with the United States at the time of the motor vehicle accident. 15 2. On September 1, 2016, Plaintiff WILSON was operating a 2005 Toyota Corolla, 16 traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue, approaching Saylor Avenue, in Las Vegas, 17 Nevada. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3. On September 1, 2016, Nakia McCloud was operating a General Motors Terrain SLE, traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue. 4. On September 1, 2016, a dismissed party, DEMHA-SANTIAGO, was operating a 2006 Acura 3.2 TL, traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue. 5. The vehicle operated by DEMHA-SANTIAGO was owned by another dismissed party, DEMHA. 6. The front of Nakia McCloud’s vehicle collided with the rear of Plaintiff WILSON’s vehicle. 7. The front of DEMHA-SANTIAGO’s vehicle collided with the rear of Plaintiff WILSON’s vehicle. 28 Page 3 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 4 of 18 1 8. The collision between DEMHA-SANTIAGO and Plaintiff did not occur until after McCloud’s vehicle collided with the Plaintiff’s vehicle. 2 3 4 IV. The following facts, though not admitted, will not be contested at trial by evidence to 5 the contrary: 6 None. 7 V. 8 The following are Plaintiff’s issues of fact to be tried and determined at trial: 9 1. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 and reasonable manner at the time of the incident. 2. 12 13 Whether Nakia McCloud was negligent in her failure to operate her vehicle in a safe Whether Defendant USA is liable for Plaintiff’s injuries in light of Nakia McCloud’s breach of duty. 3. Whether Plaintiff could have reasonably been expected to avoid the second collision 14 pursuant to the Court’s Order (ECF 113). (Plaintiff disputes USA’s ability to argue 15 this issue given its failure to assert a comparative negligence claim or to apportion 16 Plaintiff’s damages between the two accidents, as well as the dismissal of the 17 DEMHA Defendants. Thus, this may be a moot point at the time of trial.) 18 4. Whether the subject collisions proximately caused injuries to Plaintiff. 19 5. Whether the subject collisions proximately caused damages to Plaintiff. 20 6. Whether the medical treatment claimed was/is reasonable, necessary, and related to 21 the alleged collisions. 22 7. Whether the Plaintiff will have future symptoms related to the alleged collisions. 23 8. Whether the Plaintiff will incur future treatments related to the alleged collisions. 24 9. Whether the Plaintiff suffered a loss of earning capacity related to the alleged 25 26 27 collisions. 10. Whether the Plaintiff has mitigated her damages that she relates to the alleged collisions. 28 Page 4 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 5 of 18 1 2 3 11. The following are Defendant USA’s issues of fact to be tried / determined at trial. 1. move vehicle off the travel lane, failing to move off to the side of the road and wait 5 for emergency services, and exiting and re-entry in her own vehicle, contributed to 6 her alleged injuries in this case? 7 2. Whether the United States is liable to Plaintiff and if so, to what extent. 8 3. Whether, and to what extent, Plaintiff was injured as a result of both accidents on 10 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP Whether Plaintiff’s conduct, specifically failing to put on hazard lights, failing to 4 9 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 The monetary value of Plaintiff's damages, including pain and suffering, if any. September 1, 2016? 4. accident involving the United States’ employee. 11 12 5. Whether Plaintiff or any other party’s negligence contributed to the accidents and/or Plaintiff’s injuries. 13 14 Whether and the extent to which Plaintiff was injured as a result of the first 6. Whether, and to what extent, the medical treatment Plaintiff received was 15 reasonable and necessary due to the accidents on September 1, 2016? 16 VI. 17 (a) The following exhibits are stipulated into evidence and intended to be admitted: 18 See “Exhibit A” of this document. 19 (b) The parties agree the following exhibits will be available for use at the time of trial and 20 the parties agree to their foundation and authenticity, but are not currently intended to be admitted: 21 See “Exhibit A-1” of this document. 22 (c) The following exhibits are offered by Plaintiff: 23 See “Exhibit B” of this document. 24 Plaintiff reserves the right to use any documents disclosed by Defendants, including those 25 which experts have reviewed and formed opinions, such as reports; pleadings; correspondence; 26 notes and medical records and billing. 27 Plaintiff may use any and all writings, published works, journals, treatises, medical texts, 28 Page 5 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 6 of 18 1 affidavits, films, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, reports, computer tapes, computer discs, 2 and other data compilations, and other medical reference materials which Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s 3 expert(s) use in support of Plaintiff’s allegations. By disclosing documents, Plaintiff does not waive 4 the right to challenge and exclude documents, or portions thereof, on any basis. 5 Plaintiff may offer documents needed for rebuttal or impeachment purposes, including, but 6 not limited to, discovery obtained during the course of litigation as permitted; pleadings; and other 7 documentation in accordance with admissible evidence. There may be additional exhibits which 8 Plaintiff may wish to offer at the time of trial, not listed above. When and if that determination is 9 made, notice will be given immediately and supplied to the Court and to Defendants. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 (d) The following exhibits are offered by Defendant: See “Exhibit C” of this document. 11 12 Defendant reserves the right to use any document including but not limited to discovery 13 responses and/or deposition testimony by Plaintiff or co-defendants for impeachment and/or 14 substantively as party admissions, as may be relevant at trial. Defendant reserves the right to use 15 demonstrative evidence. Defendant also reserves the right to use any exhibit listed or introduced by 16 Plaintiff or co-defendants, or as previously produced by the parties. 17 (e) Electronic evidence: 18 1. The parties may offer Power Point images/drawings/diagrams/animations/story 19 boards depicting the facts and circumstance of the accident, information relevant to 20 communications between the parties, and/or deposition testimony. 21 2. 22 deliberations. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// The parties do intend to present electronic evidence for purposes of bench 28 Page 6 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 7 of 18 1 (f) Depositions: 2 1. Plaintiff will offer the following deposition testimony at trial: 3 Deponent Liceth Demha 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Offered Testimony 10:24-11:20, 21:1-19, 22:18-23:4, 27:22-28:8, 28:24-31:16, 35:2049:24, 52:16-53:15, 57:14-62:4 Nakia McCloud 12:21-13:14, 27:4-28:16, 32:8-34:11, 34:25-35:23, 39:8-47:20, 48:2254:22, 57:15-62:22, 65:3-72:6, 73:14-75:25, 76:24-78:15, 83:17-85:6, 92:13-93:19, 96:9-96:14 Sonalolita Wilson 13:2-13:22, 15:3-15:10, 15:15-16:15, 17:4-17:12, 19:8-19:14, 19:2022:23, 23:9-26:10, 27:7-29:18, 34:14-35:9, 35:25-38:10, 38:24-40:25, 42:5-54:1, 54:9-60:2, 65:5-66:18,67:17-69:17, 71:6-75:23, 80:1582:16, 86:8-88:3, 88:17-89:15, 89:25-90:13, 93:8-96:10, 97:10-101:20, 102:14-103:1, 105:18-106:18, 107:11-109:10, 109:25-111:12, 111:19112:6, 112:19-119:4, 123:12-125:5, 125:20-135:15, 136:5-138:13 Baduk Ghuman 18:14 – 20:6, 21:9 – 22:22, 27:16 – 28:25, 30:8 – 33:11, 35:1-41:9, 44:9– 49:5, 49:6-50:8, 50:14-55:3, 55:5-56:1, 56:25-58:7, 59:2-60:23, 60:24-64:15, 64:16-67:9, 68:6-71:9, 75:11-76:25, 82:7-84:5, 84:1188:18, 89:3-91:16, 94:19-96:12, 100:6-103:25, 108:7-110:22, 111:16112:25, 113:21-115:25 Duff Kaster 15:3-15:22, 21:12-23:11, 24:9-25:1, 25:16-26:13, 26:24-27:12, 28:429:24, 32:21-33:23, 34:6-34:16, 35:1-35:18 Robert Hinton 10:4 – 11:15, 12:17 – 13:1, 14:7-15:4, 15:9-16:16, 16:20-17:12, 21:1023:19, 24:12-25:12, 26:1-30:14, 31:1-32:2, 33:9-40:23 Mark Glyman 11:25-12:21, 14:10-15:1, 19:1-22:4, 22:18-23:16, 24:4-31:16, 33:333:20, 34:13-37:13,37:20-41:16, 41:22-43:9, 44:1-44:23 Thomas Dunn 7:12-9:12, 19:13-20:16, 23:5-24:2, 25:4-25:22, 26:18-31:19, 33:2035:10, 35:17-39:10, 39:21-44:20, 48:25-50:11, 52:20-55:5, 56:7-57:7, 57:20-60:2, 60:23-61:6, 61:21-62:20, 63:19-66:3, 66:14-67:19 Rick Chavez 10:16-11:6, 20:6-20:18, 22:21-24:22, 25:3-25:14, 29:16-31:21, 41:342:19,45:9-46:1, 47:23-50:5, 51:1-53:9, 59:13-60:21, 63:14-63:25, 64:24-70:10, 71:10-72:24, 73:9-74:14, 75:25-76:17, 77:17-78:12, 79:181:14, 82:8-83:2,84:13-86:9, 87:6-87:24, 94:19-96:9, 102:21-103:19, 106:7-107:10,108:17-109:18, 110:1-112:2, 114:9-118:17 David John Oliveri 11:24-14:2, 14:14-15:15, 16:25-17:16, 20:1-20:16, 24:4-24:25, 26:226:24, 28:3-28:10, 30:3-30:17, 31:14-32:4, 32:17-36:1, 36:7-37:14, 37:22-42:1, 42:15-43:15, 44:2-45:7, 49:7-50:7, 51:8-51:16, 52:19-53:5, 53:18-54:14, 55:19-57:12, 57:21-58:20, 61:3-62:3, 64:14-64:22, 65:1166:21, 71:8-73:5, 77:6-77:13, 77:19-78:5 Jaswinder Grover 11:23-13:13, 17:6-17:22, 20:5-21:8, 21:21-22:13, 23:1-24:11, 25:227:18, 29:18-31:3, 32:3-33:1, 35:18-38:21, 39:2-41:20, 43:2-43:6, 44:16-48:25, 49:1-49:25, 50:8-52:5, 53:3-55:14, 59:5-61:4, 62:10-64:7, 66:2-68:17, 70:4-74:6, 74:23-76:9, 77:7-78:15, 80:3-81:25, 84:11-85:3, 89:4-93:12, 94:6-94:13, 94:14-96:18, 96:21-97:14, 98:3-102:14, 104:7105:16, 106:6-111:21 Sonalolita Wilson pt. 157:1-164:11, 170:8-180:1, 182:14-183:8, 184:2-185:5, 185:6-186:17, 28 Page 7 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 8 of 18 1 II 187:18-191:4, 191:15-192:8, 196:23-198:7,201:8-202:7, 205:1-207:17, 209:24-217:17, 218:22-220:11, 222:1-223:20, 225:3-227:8, 233:14236:15, 237:14-239:14, 241:7-245:4, 248:3-249:4 2 3 4 Plaintiff anticipates reading depositions into the records and reserve the right to use all 5 depositions which have been conducted in this action due to witness unavailability, if allowed under 6 FRCP 32(a)(4)(B), to refresh recollection and/or to impeach a witness, as well as any other 7 permitted use under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Evidence. 8 2. Defendant will offer the following deposition testimony at trial: 9 Deponent Baduk Ghuman MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 Jaswinder Grover Offered Testimony 10:24-11:20, 21:1-19, 22:18-23:4, 27:22-28:8, 28:24-31:16, 35:2049:24, 52:16-53:15, 57:14-62:4 12:7-9 and 15-20; 13 – 16: 1-3; 17:6 -22; 20:23 – 25; 26:22-25; 27:118; 33:2-6; 37:2-12; 41:9-20; 42:9-16; 54:15-25; 55:114; 62:22-25; 63:1-12; 84:9-25; 85:1-3 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant USA reserves the right to use all depositions which have been conducted in this action to refresh recollection and/or to impeach a witness, and otherwise use at trial in accordance with the applicable rules, i.e., Fed. R. Civ. P. 32; Fed. R. Evid. 801(d). (e) Objections to Depositions: (1) Plaintiff objects to Defendant USA’s depositions as follows: Plaintiff objects to the extent that Defendant USA seeks to introduce or use any deposition transcript at trial beyond that allowed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or the Federal Rules of Evidence. Plaintiff objects to the deposition transcripts of Drs. Ghuman and Grover as hearsay and/or improper impeachment. (3) Defendant USA objects to plaintiff’s depositions as follows: a. Plaintiff WILSON’s depositions: All testimony. b. David John Oliveri’s deposition: All testimony; including, without limitation, to any testimony related to David John Oliveri’s life care plan and future medical treatments as struck by the Court. See ECF No. 90. c. To the extent Plaintiff intends to call Defendant USA’s expert witnesses and present their Page 8 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 9 of 18 1 deposition testimony in her case-in-chief, Defendant USA objects to: All Plaintiff’s proposed 2 testimony of Defendant USA’s expert witnesses; including, without limitation, to Rick Chavez’ 3 testimony. 4 Defendant, USA reserves the right to object to any particular portions of the other deposition 5 transcripts, including, without limitation, those provided by Plaintiff. Furthermore, USA objects to 6 Plaintiff’s depositions as noted in subsection (4) below. USA further objects to the extent that either 7 Plaintiff seeks to introduce or use any deposition transcript at trial beyond that allowed under 8 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or the Federal Rules of Evidence. 9 (4) Defendant USA objects to plaintiff’s depositions as follows: MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 Deponent Liceth Demha 12 13 14 15 16 17 Nakia McCloud Sonalolita Wilson 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Babuk Ghuman Offered Testimony 10:24-11:20, (calls for speculation; incomplete hypothetical; expert opinion) 21:1-19, (relevance; prejudicial) 22:18-23:4, (relevance) 27:22-28:8, (relevance) 28:24-31:16, (relevance; assumption) 35:20-49:24, (relevance; expert opinion) 57:14-62:4 (relevance; expert opinion) 39:8-47:20, (expert opinion) 83:17-85:6, (incomplete hypothetical; calls for speculation; expert opinion) 92:13-93:19, (calls for legal conclusion; expert opinion) 13:2-13:22, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion) 19:8-19:14, (relevance) 23:9-26:10, (expert opinion) 38:24-40:25, (expert opinion) 42:5-54:1, (relevance, expert opinion) 54:9-60:2, (relevance, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 71:6-75:23, (expert opinion, best evidence rule) 80:15-82:16, (relevance, prejudicial) 86:8-88:3, (relevance, expert opinion, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 88:17-89:15, (relevance, expert opinion, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 89:25-90:13, (relevance, expert opinion, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 93:8-96:10, (relevance, expert opinion, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 102:14-103:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 105:18-106:18, (relevance, prejudicial) 107:11-109:10, (relevance, prejudicial) 109:25-111:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 112:19-119:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 125:20-135:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 136:5-138:13 (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 18:14 – 20:6, (relevance, prejudicial) 28 Page 9 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 10 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 Duff Kaster 14 15 16 17 18 Robert Hinton 19 20 21 Mark Glyman 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Thomas Dunn 21:9 – 22:22, (relevance, prejudicial) 27:16 – 28:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 35:1-41:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 44:9– 49:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 50:14-55:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 55:5-56:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 56:25-58:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 59:2-60:23, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 60:24-64:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 64:16-67:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 68:6-71:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 75:11-76:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 82:7-84:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 84:11-88:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 89:3-91:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 94:19-96:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 100:6-103:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 108:7-110:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 111:16-112:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 113:21-115:25 (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 15:3-15:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 21:12-23:11, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 24:9-25:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 25:16-26:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 26:24-27:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 28:4-29:24, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 32:21-33:23, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 34:6-34:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 35:1-35:18(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 21:10-23:19, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 24:12-25:12, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 26:1-30:14, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 31:1-32:2, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 33:9-40:23(relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 11:25-12:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 14:10-15:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 19:1-22:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 22:18-23:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 24:4-31:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 33:3-33:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 34:13-37:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 37:20-41:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 41:22-43:9, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 44:1-44:23(relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 25:4-25:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 26:18-31:19, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 33:20-35:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) Page 10 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 11 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rick Chavez 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 David John Oliveri 35:17-39:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 39:21-44:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 48:25-50:11, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 52:20-55:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 56:7-57:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 57:20-60:2, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 60:23-61:6, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 61:21-62:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 63:19-66:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 66:14-67:19(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 10:16-11:6, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 20:6-20:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 22:21-24:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 25:3-25:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 29:16-31:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 41:3-42:19, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 45:9-46:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 47:23-50:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 51:1-53:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 59:13-60:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 63:14-63:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 64:24-70:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 71:10-72:24, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 73:9-74:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 75:25-76:17, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 77:17-78:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 79:1-81:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 82:8-83:2, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 84:13-86:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 87:6-87:24, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 94:19-96:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 102:21-103:19, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 106:7-107:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 108:17-109:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 110:1-112:2, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 114:9-118:17(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 11:24-14:2, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 14:14-15:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 16:25-17:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 20:1-20:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 24:4-24:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 26:2-26:24, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 28:3-28:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 30:3-30:17, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 31:14-32:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 32:17-36:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 36:7-37:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) Page 11 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 12 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 Jaswinder Grover 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sonalolita Wilson pt. II 37:22-42:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 42:15-43:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 44:2-45:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 49:7-50:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 51:8-51:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 52:19-53:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 53:18-54:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 55:19-57:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 57:21-58:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 61:3-62:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 64:14-64:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 65:11-66:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 71:8-73:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 77:6-77:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 77:19-78:5(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 11:23-13:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 17:6-17:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 20:5-21:8, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 21:21-22:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 23:1-24:11, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 25:2-27:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 29:18-31:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 32:3-33:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 35:18-38:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 39:2-41:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 43:2-43:6, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 44:16-48:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 49:1-49:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 50:8-52:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 53:3-55:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 59:5-61:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 62:10-64:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 66:2-68:17, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 70:4-74:6, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 74:23-76:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 77:7-78:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 80:3-81:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 84:11-85:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 89:4-93:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 94:6-94:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 94:14-96:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 96:21-97:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 8:3-102:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 104:7-105:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 106:6-111:21(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 170:8-180:1, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 184:2-185:5, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) Page 12 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 13 of 18 1 185:6-186:17, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 187:18-191:4, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 191:15-192:8, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 196:23-198:7, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 205:1-207:17, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 209:24-217:17, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 218:22-220:11, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 222:1-223:20, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 225:3-227:8, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 233:14-236:15, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 237:14-239:14, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 241:7-245:4, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 248:3-249:4(relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 (5) Plaintiff objects to Defendant USA’s depositions as follows: Deponent Jaswinder Grover 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Babuk Ghuman Offered Testimony 13 – 16: 1-3 (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 33:2-6 (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 41:9-20 (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 42:9-16 (speculation, relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 84:9-25 (speculation, relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 5:12-15 (relevance) 8:15-22 (relevance) 10:9-13 (relevance, prejudicial) 11:8-12:3 (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence) 12:12-16 (speculation, relevance, prejudicial, best evidence) 17:19-23 (relevance, prejudicial) 22:23-23:10 (relevance, prejudicial, speculation, improper hypothetical, best evidence) 25:23-25 (best evidence) 33:3-11 (relevance, prejudicial) 74:21-75:1 (best evidence) 82:1-3 (speculation, best evidence) 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff reserves the right to object to any particular portions of the deposition transcripts, including, without limitation, those provided by Defendant USA. Furthermore, Plaintiff objects to the extent that either Defendant USA seeks to introduce or use any deposition transcript at trial beyond that allowed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or the Federal Rules of Evidence. 27 28 Page 13 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 14 of 18 1 2 VII. The following witnesses may be called by the parties at trial: 3 (a) Plaintiff intends to call the following witnesses at trial: 4 1. Plaintiff, SONALOLITA WILSON c/o /o Bradley S. Mainor, Esq. Joseph J. Wirth, Esq. Ash Marie Blackburn, Esq. Joseph W. Guindy, Esq. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, NV 89148 (702) 464-5000 2. Nakia McCloud c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100, (702) 388-6336 3. Witness, Liceth Demha-Santiago c/o the Law Offices of Denise McCurry 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd. #349 Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 408-3805 4. Mark Glyman, M.D., DDS, FACS FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able Mark Glyman, M.D., DDS, FACS / Abby Dental 1775 Village Center Cir, #150 Las Vegas, NV, 89113 (702) 507-5555 5. Thomas Dunn, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able Desert Orthopedic Center 2800 E. Dessert Inn Rd., Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89121 (702) 731-1616 6. David Oliveri, M.D. 851 S. Rampart Dr., # 115, Las Vegas, NV 89145 (702) 778-9300 7. Ira Spector, M.S., C.R.C. 3440 E. Russell Rd., #208 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 14 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 15 of 18 1 Las Vegas, NV 89120, (702) 214-4294 2 3 8. Travis Snyder IMGEN 4045 S. Buffalo Dr. #A101-363 Las Vegas, NV 89147 9. Paul Thomas, Ph.D., MRC, CRC Vocational Economics, Inc. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 517 Las Vegas, NV 89169 (702) 718-1600 10. Samuel Terry Exhibit A P.O. Box 530111 Henderson, NV 89053 11. Michael Freeman Med Dr. Ph.D., Forensic Research & Analysis 4256 NW 10th Ave. # 306 Portland, OR 97209 12. Frank Perez, Ph.D., 4435 N. First St., #205 Livermore, CA 13. Robert Lee Hinton 98 S. Martin Luther King, Apt. 234 Las Vegas, NV 89106 (810) 618-1344 14. Plaintiff reserves the right to call any witnesses identified in Defendant’s witness 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 list and named during the course of discovery; 21 22 15. Plaintiff reserves the right to call rebuttal and/or impeachment witnesses at trial; 23 16. Plaintiff reserves the right to call any of Defendant’s experts as witnesses. 24 Defendant USA reserves all rights of objections to testimonies at trial including but not 25 limited to any expert opinions that were not timely disclosed in discovery, lack foundation, and/or 26 are not relevant and reliable. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), 37(c)(1), Daubert v. Merrell Dow 27 Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and its progeny. Defendant, USA, also objects to testimony by 28 Page 15 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 16 of 18 1 any witness that was not disclosed during the discovery period or whose testimony was already 2 excluded by the Court, including Dr. Oliveri. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 (a) Defendant USA’s Witnesses 1. Nakia McCloud c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100, (702) 388-6336 2. Plaintiff, SONALOLITA WILSON c/o /o Bradley S. Mainor, Esq. Joseph J. Wirth, Esq. Ash Marie Blackburn, Esq. Joseph W. Guindy, Esq. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, NV 89148 (702) 464-5000 3. Defendant, Liceth Demha-Santiago c/o the Law Offices of Denise McCurry 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd. #349 Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 408-3805 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 4. Defendant, Juan Demha, c/o the Law Offices of Denise McCurry 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd. #349, Las Vegas, NV 89128, (702) 408-3805 6. Rick Chavez, MD Pain and Addiction Integrated Network, Inc., 4733 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 625 Torrance, CA, 90506 (323) 833-8269 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. James G. Lowe, MD, FACS Lowe-Greenwood-Zerbo Spinal Associates 1999 New Road, Suite B Linwood, NJ, 08221 (609) 601-6363 8. Mark Remas, MA, CRC, ABVE The Remas Group Page 16 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 17 of 18 1 7710 Balboa Avenue, Suite 218-H San Diego, CA, 92111 (858) 560-6733 2 3 9. Warren M. Torchinsky, DDS 223 East Main Street Maple Shade, NJ, 08052 (856) 667-7900 4 5 6 10. Eugenia Larmore, PhD, MBA 550 West Plumb Lane, Suite B459 Reno, NV 89509 (775) 232-7203 7 8 9 11. Defendant, USA, reserves the right to call any witnesses identified in Plaintiff’s MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 witness list and named during the course of discovery. 11 12. Defendant reserves the right to call rebuttal and/or impeachment witnesses at trial; 12 13. Defendant reserves the right to call any of Plaintiff’s experts as witnesses. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff reserves all rights of objections to testimonies at trial including but not limited to any expert opinions that were not timely disclosed in discovery, lack foundation, and/or are not relevant and reliable. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), 37(c)(1), Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and its progeny. Plaintiff also objects to the testimony of Eugenia Larmore to the extent that her opinions violate the collateral source rule under Proctor v. Castelletti, 911 P.2d 853, 854 n.1 (Nev. 1996). Plaintiff also objects to testimony by any witness whose testimony was already excluded by the Court. 20 VIII. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Trial is currently set to begin on July 10, 2023. /// /// /// /// /// /// 28 Page 17 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193 Filed 06/07/23 Page 18 of 18 1 2 3 IX. The parties estimate that trial last a total of 5 days. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 4 DATED this 7th day of June, 2023. DATED this 7th day of June, 2023. 5 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP UNITED STATES ATTORNEY _/s/ Ash Marie Blackburn________ BRADLEY S. MAINOR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7434 ASH MARIE BLACKBURN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14712 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, NV 89148-5652 Counsel for Plaintiff _/s/ R. Thomas Colona R. THOMAS COLONNA 501 Las Vegas Blvd, South., Ste. 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorney for Defendant United States of America 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 X. 13 ACTION BY THE COURT 14 __ This case is set for bench trial on July 10, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. Calendar call 15 will be held on July 5, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. This pretrial order has been 16 approved by the parties to this action as evidenced by their signatures or the signatures of their 17 attorneys hereon, and the order is hereby entered and will govern the trial of this case. This order 18 may not be amended except by court order and based upon the parties’ agreement or to prevent 19 manifest injustice. 20 DATED: June 9 , 2023. 21 22 23 _____________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 Page 18 of 18 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 5 1 EXHIBIT A 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 SONALOLITA WILSON Plaintiff 5 vs. 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 7 8 9 CASE NO.: Stipulated Admitted 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK Exhibits Intended to be Defendants. Exhibit Description 10 1. Manpower Employment File 2. Plaintiff’s Employment Records From Staffmark 3. TrueBlue Records/ Peopleready Regarding Plaintiff’s Earnings 13 4. Traffic Accident Report #LVM160901003306 14 5. Traffic Accident Report #LVM160901002946 15 6. Custodian of Records for 911 recordings and breakdown 16 7. 17 8. 911 Recordings Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Las Vegas Fire and Rescue for Date of Service September 1, 2016 9. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for University Medical Center for Date of Service September 1, 2016 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 9-A Films From University Medical Center 10. Medical Records and Billing for McCourt PLLC a/k/a EMP of Clark UMC for Date of Service September 1, 2016 11. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Desert Radiology Solutions Dates of Service September 1, 2016 Through December 18, 2020 23 24 11-A Films from Desert Radiology Solutions Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 5 1 12. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Nevada Spine Clinic Dates of Service September 8, 2016 Through March 16, 2023 2 Films from Nevada Spine Clinic 3 12-A 4 13. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Better Back Physical Therapy Dates of Service September 9, 2016 Through December 2, 2016 14. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Mark Glyman, M.D. Dates of Service September 13, 2016 Through November 13, 2019 15. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for American Radiology Dates of Service September 15, 2016 Through April 26, 2022 16. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Desert Orthopaedics Center Dates of Service September 30, 2016 Through March 15, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 16-A 17. Films for Desert Orthopaedics Center Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Pueblo Medical Imaging Date of Service September 30, 2016 Films from Pueblo Medical Imaging 13 17-A 14 18. Medical Records and Billing for Absolute Dental Date of Service October 13, 2016 19. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Desert Anesthesiologist, Inc. Date of Service January 11, 2017 20. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Specialty Surgery Center Date of Service January 11, 2017 21. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Abby Dental/. Dates of Service February 27, 2017 Through March 15, 2017 22. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Smoke Ranch Surgery Center Dates of Service September 3, 2017 Through July 28, 2022 23. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Don Nobis Progressive Physical Therapy Dates of Service December 26, 2017 Through March 23, 2023 24. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Silver State Neurology Dates of Service January 2, 2018 Through February 26, 2018 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 3 of 5 1 25. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Louis F. Mortillaro Dates of Service November 14, 2018 Through December 5, 2018 26. Medical Records and Billing for Lien RX Dates of Service January 4, 2019 Through January 23, 2019 27. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for 986 Specialty Pharmacy Dates of Service January 4, 2019 Through June 29, 2021 28. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Smoke Ranch Specialists Dates of Service January 10, 2019 Through May 2, 2019 29. Medical Records and Billing for CarePro Home Health, Dates of Service January 11, 2019 Through February 11, 2019 30. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Lyons Home Care Dates of Service January 12, 2019 Through February 1, 2019 31. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for PayLater Pharmacy Date of Service January 23, 2019 32. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for American Medical Response Date of Service May 2, 2019 Through May 20, 2019 33. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Las Vegas Pharmacy Dates of Service March 8, 2019 Through July 1, 2020 34. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Mountain View Hospital Date of Service May 2, 2019 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 34-A 17 Films for Mountain View Hospital 35. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Fremont Emergency Services Date of Service May 2, 2019 36. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Mountains Edge Hospital Dates of Service May 3, 2019 Through May 6, 2019 37. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Valley Hospital Medical Center Dates of Service May 8, 2019 Through May 12, 2019 18 19 20 21 22 37-A 23 38. Films from Valley Hospital Medical Center Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Shadow Emergency Physicians Date of Service May 8, 2019 through May 14, 2019 24 3 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 4 of 5 1 39. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Monitoring Associates Date of Service May 15, 2019 40. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Summerlin Hospital Medical Center Dates of Service May 15, 2019 Through May 20, 2019 2 3 4 Films from Summerlin Hospital Medical Center 5 40-A 6 41. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Kindred Hospital Las Vegas- Sahara Campus Dates of Service May 21, 2019 Through August 2, 2019 42. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Next Step Medical Date of Service July 3, 2019 43. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Dental Center of Nevada Date of Service September 16, 2019 44. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Zynex Medical, Inc. Date of Service November 21, 2019 45. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Shiode Psychotherapy, Inc. Dates of Service December 12, 2019 Through March 9, 2020 46. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Radar Medical Group Dates of Service January 16, 2020 Through August 7, 2020 47. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Open Sided MRI Dates of Service February 6, 2020 Through February 7, 2020 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 47-A Films from Open Sided MRI 48. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Grand Desert Psychiatric Services Dates of Service March 16, 2020 Through May 14, 2020 49. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Las Vegas Health/ Dr. Hamid Services Dates of Service July 8, 2020 Through August 4, 2020 50. Medical Records and Billing for Silver State Adult Day Care Dates of Service October 1, 2020 Through November 4, 2021 51. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Prosthetic Center of Excellence Dates of Service May 12, 2021 Through May 20, 2021 19 20 21 22 23 24 4 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 5 of 5 1 52. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Pure Medical Equipment, Inc. Dates of Service February 8, 2022 53. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Quest Diagnostic, Inc. Dates of Service January 28, 2020 Through July 27, 2020 2 3 4 54. 2018 W-4 Completed Form for Sonalolita Wilson 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-2 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 4 1 EXHIBIT A-1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 SONALOLITA WILSON Plaintiff 5 vs. 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN DEMHA; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 7 8 11 12 1. 2. 3. 14 4. 5. 6. 16 7. 17 18 19 8. 9. 10. 20 11. 21 12. 22 13. 23 24 Stipulated Exhibits Available For Use At The Time of Trial But Are Not Currently Admitted Exhibit Description 13 15 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK Defendants. 9 10 CASE NO.: Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint Defendant United States’ Answer to Plainitff’s First Amended Complaint Google Overhead Photo Depicting the Subject Intersection (1) Google Overhead Photo Depicting the Subject Intersection (2) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (1) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (2) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (3) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (4) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (5) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (6) Black and White Photo Depicting Plaintiff’s Property Damage (1) Black and White Photo Depicting Plaintiff’s Property Damage (2) Prior Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Mountain View Hospital for Date of Service November 9, 2014 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-2 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 4 1 14. 2 3 Prior Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for University Medical Center for Date of Service January 21, 2014 15. Prior Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Valley Hospital for Date of Service February 22, 2016 4 16. 5 17. 6 Life Expectancy Table Transcripts of Deposition of Babuk Guman, M.D., With Exhibits Transcript of Deposition of Rick Chavez, M.D., With Exhibits 7 8 18. 19. 9 Transcript of deposition of Robert L. Hinton 20. 21. 14 15 22. 23. 24. 16 17 25. 19 27. 20 28. 23 24 Transcript of deposition of Sonalolita G. Wilson, with exhibits Vol 2 Transcript of deposition of David J. Oliveri M.D Transcript of deposition of Thomas Dunn, M.D Transcript of deposition of Frank A. Perez, Ph.D David Oliveri, M.D. Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule 26. 22 Transcript of deposition of Sonalolita G. Wilson, with exhibits. Vol 1 Transcript of deposition of Jaswinder Grover, M.D 18 21 Transcript of deposition of Duff Kaster, D.D.S., with exhibits Transcript of deposition of Nakia McCloud, with exhibits 12 13 Transcript of deposition of Mark L. Glyman, M.D., D.D.S., F.A.C.S., with exhibits 10 11 Transcript of deposition of Liceth Demha 29. 30. 31. 32. David Oliveri, M.D. Expert Report dated December 2, 2019 David Oliveri, M.D. Supplemental Expert Report dated August 4, 2020 David Oliveri, M.D. Supplemental Expert Report dated August 4, 2020 David Oliveri, M.D. Supplemental Expert Report dated December 11, 2020 David Oliveri, M.D. Supplemental Expert Report dated April 2, 2021 David Oliveri, M.D. Supplemental Expert Report dated July 26, 20200 David Oliveri, M.D. Supplemental Expert Report dated March 2, 2023 2 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-2 Filed 06/07/23 Page 3 of 4 1 33. 2 34. 3 4 36. 5 37. 7 Ira Spector M.S. C.R.C, M.D. Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule 35. 6 David Oliveri, M.D. Supplemental Expert Report dated March 30, 2023 38. 39. Ira Spector M.S. C.R.C, Expert Report dated December 12, 2019 Ira Spector M.S. C.R.C, Rebuttal Expert Report dated July 23, 2020 Samuel R. Terry Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Samuel R. Terry Expert Report dated June 3, 2020 Michael D. Freeman, MedDr, PhD, MPH, DLM, FAAFS Curriculum Vitae, 8 Testimony List, and Fess Schedule 9 40. 10 11 July 8, 2020 41. 42. 13 15 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 20 48. 23 24 Terrence M. Clauretie, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Terrence M. Clauretie, Ph.D. Expert Report dated February 4, 2020 Thomas Dunn, MD Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule 19 22 Frank Perez, PhD, FAAFS Expert Report dated July 8, 2020 Schedule 18 21 Frank Perez, Ph.D Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List Frank Perez, PhD, FAAFS Expert Report dated July 8, 2020 16 17 Michael D. Freeman, MedDr, PhD, MPH, DLM, FAAFS Rebuttal Expert Report dated August 5, 2020 12 14 Michael D. Freeman, MedDr, PhD, MPH, DLM, FAAFS Expert Report dated 49. 50. 51. 52. Thomas Dunn, MD Rebuttal Expert Report dated August 3, 2020 Travis Snyder, D.O. Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Travis Snyder, D.O. Rebuttal Expert Report dated August 7, 2020 Dr. James Lowe’s Expert Report (dated April 27, 2020) Dr. James Lowe’s Rebuttal Expert Report (dated July 27, 2020) Dr. James Lowe’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Dr. Rick Chavez’s Expert Report (dated July 7, 2020) 3 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-2 Filed 06/07/23 Page 4 of 4 1 53. 2 54. 3 55. Dr. Rick Chavez’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Dr. Warren Torchinsky’s Expert Report (dated November 12, 2019) Dr. Warren Torchinsky’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess 4 Schedule 5 Mark Remas’s Expert Report (dated April 28, 2020) 56. 6 7 57. 58. Mark Remas’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Eugenia A. Larmore, PhD, MBA’s Rebuttal Report Dated March 31, 2023 Eugenia A. Larmore, PhD, MBA’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and 8 Fess Schedule 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 4 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-3 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 2 1 EXHIBIT B 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 SONALOLITA WILSON Plaintiff 5 vs. 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN DEMHA; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 7 8 Plaintiff’s Exhibits Exhibit Description 11 1. IRS Incident Report 12 2. Color Photo Depicting Plaintiff’s Property Damage 3. Farmers Insurance Exchange Property Damage Estimate of Plaintiff’s Vehicle 15 4. Black Box Data for Defendant’s Vehicle GMC Terrain 2014 16 5. Vehicle information regarding vehicle driven by Nikia McCloud’s 6. Color Photo of Plaintiff’s Injury Taken by Plaintiff on September 13, 2016 (1) 7. Color Photo of Plaintiff’s Injury Taken by Plaintiff on September 13, 2016 (2) 8. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Full Body Seizure Taken by Robert Hinton 9. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Right Leg Spasm Taken by Robert Hinton 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK Defendants. 9 10 CASE NO.: Defendant USA’s Objections Privileged; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence (No Bates Number Provided) Relevance; foundation; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity (No Bates Numbers Provided) Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity (No Bates Numbers Provided) Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-3 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 2 1 2 10. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Leg Spasms When Walking Taken by Robert Hinton 11. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Full Body Seizure 12. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Right Leg Spasm 13. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Right Leg Spasm 14. Plaintiff Medical Specials Chart 15. Travis Snyder, D.O. Presentation (Plaintiff intends to use portions of Dr. Snyder’s presentation an demonstrative exhibit) 16. Defendant United State’s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation 17. Defendant United State’s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Production Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 193-4 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 1 1 EXHIBIT C 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 SONALOLITA WILSON Plaintiff vs. 11 Exhibit Description Plaintiff’s First Supplemental Response to Defendant United States’ First Set of Interrogatories (dated November 8, 2019 Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation 578. Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Response to Defendant United States’ First Set of Interrogatories (dated January 28, 2021 Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation 579. Plaintiff’s Third Supplemental Response to Defendant United States’ First Set of Interrogatories (dated February 5, 2021) Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant United States’ Second Set of Interrogatories (dated November 22, 2019) Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant United States’ Third Set of Interrogatories (dated March 20, 2020) Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Response to Defendant Demha’s First Set of Interrogatories (February 5, 2021) Demha Defendants’ Answers to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories (dated February 28, 2020) Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation 16 17 18 580. 581. 19 582. 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff’s Objections 577. 14 15 Defendant United States of America’s Trial Exhibits Defendants. 12 13 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN DEMHA; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 9 10 CASE NO.: 583. Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.