Olsen v. Preferred HomeCare et al, No. 2:2017cv00547 - Document 29 (D. Nev. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER granting 28 Stipulation; Discovery due by 12/24/2018. Motions due by 1/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Olsen v. Preferred HomeCare et al Doc. 29 Case 2:17-cv-00547-GMN-GWF Document 28 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7 1 6 JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9046 STEPHEN G. CLOUGH, ESQ, Nevada Bar No. 9752 MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES 8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Telephone: 702.629.7900 Facsimile: 702.629.7925 E-mail: jag@mgalaw.com laa@mgalaw.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond J. Olsen, Jr. 2 3 4 5 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 11 12 13 RAYMOND J. OLSEN, JR., an individual, 14 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00547-GMN-GWF Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 15 16 17 18 vs. EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES PREFERRED HOMECARE/LIFECARE SOLUTIONS, an Arizona limited liability company; MEDICAL DEPOT, INC., dba DRIVE DEVILBISS HEALTHCARE, a New York corporation; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, [Fifth Request] 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 Plaintiff RAYMOND J. OLSEN, JR (“Plaintiff”) by and through his counsel of record, the 23 law firm of MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES, Defendants MEDICAL DEPOT, INC. dba 24 DRIVE DEVILBISS HEALTHCARE (“Med Depot”), and PREFERRED HOMECARE/LIFECARE 25 SOLUTIONS (“Preferred Homecare”)(and collectively with Med Depot, “Defendants”) by and 26 through counsel of record, the law firm of WILEY PETERSEN; and (collectively with Defendants, 27 the “Parties”), stipulate and agree to extend the discovery deadlines in this case as follows and hereby 28 submit the same for this Court’s review and consideration: 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:17-cv-00547-GMN-GWF Document 28 Filed 08/23/18 Page 2 of 7 1 Deadline Current Date Proposed Extension 2 Initial expert disclosures 08/23/2018 10/23/2018 3 Rebuttal expert disclosures 09/24/2018 11/24/2018 4 Discovery Cut-off 10/26/2018 12/26/2018 5 Dispositive motions 09/26/2018 01/26/2019 6 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT REGARDING TIMELINESS AND GOOD CAUSE 7 This fifth stipulated request to extend discovery deadlines is timely as it is made more than 8 twenty-one days before all of the deadlines to be moved with the exception of the Initial Expert 9 Disclosure Deadline (August 23, 2018). See LR 26-4. This fifth stipulated request is also supported 10 by good cause based on: (1) the complexity of the liability and damages issues involved, which have 11 required significant time to review and prepare for depositions of the numerous experts, treating 12 physicians, and lay witnesses; (2) the large volume of medical records from approximately thirty-nine 13 (39) medical providers and on-going treatment, which has required extensive time and analysis by 14 both the Parties and their experts; (3) the difficulty in the Parties efforts to schedule appropriate 15 depositions and the ability of expert witnesses to properly evaluate and offer opinions regarding the 16 over 3,200 pages of medical records in this matter; (4) the difficulty in located the receptionist of 17 Preferred Homecare/Lifecare that aided Plaintiff in his purchase of the subject knee scooter, who, as 18 of this date, has not been located; and (5) a multi-million-dollar statement of damages by Plaintiff 19 including. The Parties have been working cooperatively and diligently to obtain and produce records, 20 respond to written discovery, coordinate depositions, and otherwise complete discovery consistent 21 with the existing scheduling order, a short 45-day continuation of the current deadlines is necessary 22 considering the extensive discovery that is required notwithstanding the Parties’ diligence. See FRCP 23 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir.1992). 24 25 26 27 28 II. DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE Since the initial Scheduling Order (see Dkt. 13), the parties have completed the following discovery: FRCP 26 Disclosures and Supplements Plaintiff has served Initial and 1st, 2nd, 3rdd and 4th Supplemental Disclosures 2 Case 2:17-cv-00547-GMN-GWF Document 28 Filed 08/23/18 Page 3 of 7 1 of Witnesses and Documents identifying twenty-four witnesses and 2 approximately 1,500 pages of documents; 3 4 Preferred Homecare has served Initial Disclosures identifying approximately 60 additional pages of documents; and 5 Medical Depot has served an Initial Disclosure, 1st and 2nd Supplemental 6 Disclosure of documents and witnesses identifying multiple witnesses and 7 approximately 3,000 pages of documents. Despite the diligence of the Parties, 8 there still remains medical records from several medical providers that are in 9 the process of being obtained. 10 11 12 Written Discovery Plaintiff has served the following sets of written discovery, all of which have been responded to by the appropriate defendant: 13 1st Interrogatories to Med Depot; 14 1st Requests for Production of Documents to Med Depot; 15 2nd Interrogatories to Med Depot; 16 1st Interrogatories to Preferred Homecare; 17 1st Requests for Production of Documents to Preferred Homecare; and 18 2nd Interrogatories to Preferred Homecare. 19 20 Med Depot has served, and Plaintiff has responded to, the following sets of written discovery: 21 1st Interrogatories; 22 1st Requests for Production of Documents; and 23 1st Requests for Admission. 24 25 26 27 28 The parties have coordinated and conducted inspections of both the subject scooter and the school premises where Plaintiff’s incident occurred. The Law Offices of Wiley Petersen has substituted in as counsel for Preferred Homecare. Depositions - The following depositions have been completed: 3 Case 2:17-cv-00547-GMN-GWF Document 28 Filed 08/23/18 Page 4 of 7 1 Plaintiff, Raymond J. Olsen; 2 FRCP 30(b)(6) witness for Medical Depot on 9 separate topics; 3 FRCP 30 (b)(6) witness for Preferred Homecare on 10 separate topics; 4 Dr. Roman Sibel; 5 The following depositions need to be completed: 6 Plaintiff’s daughter (date TBD); and 7 approximately five (5) other, lay witnesses (dates TBD) 8 Dr. Troy Watson, Plaintiff’s Expert, September 19, 2018. 9 Preferred Homecare/Lifecare receptionist (location unknown) 10 11 III. DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED The following discovery remains: 12 Document Production: As noted above, while many pages have been received and 13 produced already, records from a few treating physicians must still be obtained, 14 evaluated, and properly disclosed. Defendants are in the process of obtaining and 15 reviewing additional medical records from several different medical providers. 16 Defendants are still waiting on some additional medical records from several medical 17 providers. 18 Depositions: 19 20 The depositions of treating/expert physicians and the witnesses mentioned above must be completed; 21 Medical Depot anticipates, the need to take the depositions of approximately 22 two (2) to eight (8) depositions of Plaintiff’s various treating physicians, and is 23 in the process of obtaining availability of these treating physicians, including, 24 but not necessarily limited to: 25 Dr. Roddy McGee; 26 Dr. Thomman Kuruvilla; 27 Dr. Michael Schlaack; 28 Dr. Troy Watson; 4 Case 2:17-cv-00547-GMN-GWF Document 28 Filed 08/23/18 Page 5 of 7 1 Dr. Balduini (first name unknown at this point); 2 Jeromy Mendenhall, PA-C; 3 Preferred Homecare/Lifecare receptionist; and 4 Potentially PMK’s of various other providers. 5 Based on the complexity of Plaintiff’s medical history and the severity of the 6 injuries claimed to be related to this incident, the Parties each anticipate 7 retaining several expert witnesses and, thereafter, making appropriate 8 disclosures of related reports; Defendants will also need to take the depositions of any experts identified by 9 10 Plaintiff; and Plaintiff will take the depositions of any experts retained by Defendants. 11 12 IV. REASON WHY DISCOVERY CANNOT BE COMPLETED 13 The Parties submit their efforts to date have been sufficiently diligent and that the reason for 14 not being able to complete discovery within the current schedule is simple: there remains a significant 15 amount of information to organize and process, especially given the unusually large number of 16 treating physicians and related records, many of which still need to be reviewed.1 Additionally, 17 Plaintiff continues to treat and those records need to be collected and disclosed and possibly provided 18 to the experts for further analysis for their expert reports. The parties have exchanged over 3,200 19 pages of medical records from most of the multiple medical providers. There are some remaining 20 medical providers who have not yet provided all of the requested records. The Parties have been 21 diligent in obtaining these records and reviewing the records, however, this is a time-consuming task 22 and requires experts to perform the same. As this Court is aware, a complete set of medical records 23 was not available prior to the filing of the Complaint in this matter as Plaintiff’s counsel was retained 24 just prior to the Complaint being filed. As such, the Parties have been working together to obtain all 25 the necessary medical records. To date, the Parties have diligently worked together to move discovery 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff and Medical Depot cooperated to provide the various providers with HIPAA authorizations, but some providers have not yet responded. Moreover, as the Parties continue to analyze the records already obtained, additional providers have been identified, necessitating yet further efforts at obtaining medical records. 5 Case 2:17-cv-00547-GMN-GWF Document 28 Filed 08/23/18 Page 6 of 7 1 forward, and will continue to do so, however, the amount of medical records alone is a large 2 undertaking for the Parties as well as the retained experts. Despite this significant undertaking the 3 Parties have been able to obtain and review the majority of the necessary records. However, given 4 the time needed to obtain the records and the availability of deponents and expert witnesses additional 5 time is requested by the Parties. 6 V. PROPOSED REVISED DISCOVERY SCHEDULE 7 The Parties propose the following revised discovery schedule, which will provide for an 8 extension of each deadline by ninety (90) days, except for the deadline to Amend/Add Parties which 9 has already passed, as follows: 10 Deadline Current Date Proposed Extension 11 Initial expert disclosures 08/23/2018 10/23/2018 12 Rebuttal expert disclosures 09/24/2018 11/24/2018 13 Discovery Cut-off 10/26/2018 12/26/2018 14 Dispositive motions 09/26/2018 01/26/2019 15 16 DATED this 23rd day of August, 2018 DATED this 23rd day of August, 2018 17 18 MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES WILEY PETERSEN 19 /s/ Stephen G. Clough ______________________________________ JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9046 STEPHEN G. CLOUGH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10549 8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond J. Olsen, Jr. /s/ Ryan S. Petersen ____________________________________ RYAN S. PETERSEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10715 JASON M. WILEY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 09274 1050 Indigo Drive #130 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Defendants Medical Depot, Inc. and Preferred Homecare 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 Case 2:17-cv-00547-GMN-GWF Document 28 Filed 08/23/18 Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER The Scheduling Order and related discovery deadlines are hereby modified and extended as follows: Deadline Current Date Proposed Extension Initial expert disclosures 08/23/2018 10/23/2018 Rebuttal expert disclosures 09/24/2018 11/23/2018 Discovery Cut-off 10/26/2018 12/24/2018 Dispositive motions 09/26/2018 01/24/2019 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 __________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 Dated:______________________ 8/24/2018 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.