Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle International Corporation, No. 2:2014cv01699 - Document 212 (D. Nev. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER granting 209 Motion, directing that Exhibit 157 -1 remain under seal; directing Oracle by no later than 4/27/2016 to file redacted version of Exhibit 7 (see order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/25/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle International Corporation Doc. 212 Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 209 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLP W. WEST ALLEN (Nevada Bar No. 5566) 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 949-8200 Facsimile: (702) 949-8398 WAllen@LRRLaw.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP Thomas Dammrich (Admitted pro hac vice) tdammrich@shb.com 111 South Wacker Drive, 51st Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606 Telephone: (312) 704-7700 Facsimile: (312) 558-1195 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP B. Trent Webb (Admitted pro hac vice) bwebb@shb.com John D. Garretson (Admitted pro hac vice) jgarretson@shb.com Ryan D. Dykal (Admitted pro hac vice) rdykal@shb.com Peter Strand (Admitted pro hac vice) pstrand@shb.com Lynn C. Herndon (Admitted pro hac vice) lherndon@shb.com 2555 Grand Boulevard Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2613 Telephone: (816) 474-6550 Facsimile: (816) 421-5547 DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP James J. Pastore (Admitted pro hac vice) jjpastore@debevoise.com John S. Kiernan (Admitted pro hac vice) jskiernan@debevoise.com 919 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 909-6000 Facsimile: (212) 909-6836 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP Robert H. Reckers (Admitted pro hac vice) 600 Travis Street, Suite 3400 rreckers@shb.com Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 227-8008 Facsimile: (713) 227-9508 19 20 21 DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP Jeffrey P. Cunard (Admitted pro hac vice) jpcunard@debevoise.com 555 13th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 383-8000 Facsimile: (202) 383-9237 RIMINI STREET, INC. Daniel B. Winslow (Admitted pro hac vice) dwinslow@riministreet.com John P. Reilly (Admitted pro hac vice) jreilly@riministreet.com 6601 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 300 Pleasanton, California 94566 Telephone: (925-264-7736 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant Rimini Street, Inc., and Counter Defendant Seth Ravin 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7526463 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 209 Filed 04/21/16 Page 2 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 1 2 RIMINI STREET, INC., a Nevada corporation, 3 Plaintiffs, 4 v. 5 6 ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a California corporation, 7 Defendant, 8 9 10 v. ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, and Oracle America, Inc. PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION REGARDING THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF NON-PUBLIC RIMINI CLIENT NAMES IN DKT. 157-1 Counter Claimants, 11 v. 12 13 Case No. 2:14-cv-01699-LDG-VCF RIMINI STREET, INC., and SETH RAVIN Counter Defendants. 14 15 Pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order governing confidentiality of documents 16 entered by the Court on May 18, 2015 (See Dkt. 58, “Protective Order”), Local Rule 10-5(b) and 17 Rules 5.2 and 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Rimini 18 Street, Inc. and Counter-Defendant Seth Ravin (collectively “Rimini”) respectfully request that the 19 Court enter an Order directing that the identities of undisclosed Rimini clients contained within 20 Exhibit 7 of the Declaration of Ryan Dykal (Dkt. 157-1) be filed under seal.1 21 On April 16, 2016, Oracle filed a “Declaration of Nitin Jindal in Support of Oracle’s 22 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Response to Court Order (Dkt. 201) and in Support of 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The Protective Order provides that: “Counsel for any Designating Party may designate any Discovery Material as “Confidential Information” and as “Highly Confidential InformationAttorneys’ Eyes Only” under the terms of the Protective Order only if such counsel in good faith believes that such Discovery Material contains such information and is subject to protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The designation by any Designating Party of any Discovery Material as “Confidential Information” or “Highly Confidential Information- Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall constitute a representation that an attorney for the Designating Party reasonably believes there is a valid basis for such designation”. Protective Order at Paragraph 2. 7526463 Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 209 Filed 04/21/16 Page 3 of 5 1 Motion to Seal (Dkt. 155).” Dkt. 205. Exhibit A to Mr. Jindal’s declaration (Dkt. 205-1) is a 2 redacted copy of Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Ryan Dykal (Dkt. 157-1). Exhibit A “remove[s] 3 only the Oracle employee names from Oracle’s Initial Disclosure” and “five Rimini customer names 4 that . . . were not relevant to Rimini’s use of the exhibit and that . . . Rimini considers to be 5 confidential.” Dkt. 205 (emphasis added). 6 7 It is undisputed that the five Rimini clients redacted by Oracle in Exhibit A to Mr. Jindal’s declaration have not been disclosed to the public. 8 On April 19, the Court entered an Order stating, “No later than April 27, 2016, Oracle 9 SHALL FILE A REDACTED VERSION OF EXHIBIT 7, which obscures only the employee names 10 on its FRCP 26(s) disclosures.” (Dkt. 208). The Court’s Order does not expressly address the five 11 non-public Rimini client names. 12 The identities of non-public Rimini clients are highly confidential and proprietary 13 competitive business information. Rimini, therefore, requests that the names of the five Rimini 14 Clients removed in Exhibit A to Mr. Jindal’s declaration be redacted when Oracle publicly files 15 Exhibit 7 pursuant to the Court’s April 19 Order.2 16 Oracle does not oppose this motion. 17 For the foregoing reasons, Rimini respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order 18 as follows: 1. 19 The unredacted Exhibit 7 (Dkt. #157-1), attached to the Declaration of Ryan Dykal 20 (Dkt. #157) as an exhibit to the parties’ Joint Status Report (Dkt. #156), shall remain 21 under seal. 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 The Protective Order provides that: “Counsel for any Designating Party may designate any Discovery Material as ‘Confidential Information’ or ‘Highly Confidential Information – Attorneys’ Eyes Only’ under the terms of this Protective Order only if such counsel in good faith believes that such Discovery Material contains such information and is subject to protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The designation by any Designating Party of any Discovery Material as ‘Confidential Information’ or ‘Highly Confidential Information –Attorneys’ Eyes Only’ shall constitute a representation that an attorney for the Designating Party reasonably believes there is a valid basis for such designation.” Protective Order ¶ 2 (emphasis supplied). 28 -37526463 Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 209 Filed 04/21/16 Page 4 of 5 1 2. No later than April 27, 2016, Oracle SHALL FILE A REDACTED VERSION OF 2 EXHIBIT 7, which obscures (1) the employee names on its FRCP 26(s) disclosures, 3 and (2) the five non-public Rimini client names identified in Exhibit A to the 4 Declaration of Nitin Jindal (Dkt. 205-1). Oracle shall also link these new filings in 5 CM/ECF to the Joint Status Report (Dkt. #156) and the Declaration of Ryan Dykal 6 (Dkt. #157). 7 8 DATED: April 21, 2016 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON 9 By:_/s/ Ryan D. Dykal_____ Ryan Dykal rdykal@shb.com John Garretson jgarretson@shb.com Robert H. Reckers rreckers@shb.com B. Trent Webb bwebb@shb.com Peter Strand pstrand@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 2555 Grand Blvd. Kansas City, MO 64108-2613 816-474-6550 Telephone 816-421-5547 Facsimile 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants Rimini Street, Inc., and Seth Ravin 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -47526463 Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 209 Filed 04/21/16 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that on the 21st day of April, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing 3 document with the clerk of the court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada, using the 4 electronic case filing system. The electronic case filing system sent a “Notice of Electronic Filing” to 5 the attorneys of record who have consented in writing to accept this Notice as service of this 6 document by electronic means. 7 8 9 By: __/s/ Ryan D. Dykal_______ Ryan D. Dykal. Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants Rimini Street, Inc., and Seth Ravin 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -57526463 Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 209-1 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 1 2 RIMINI STREET, INC., a Nevada corporation, 3 Plaintiffs, 4 v. 5 6 ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a California corporation, 7 Defendant, 10 ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, and Oracle America, Inc. Counter Claimants, 11 v. 12 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION REGARDING THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF NON-PUBLIC RIMINI CLIENT NAMES IN DKT. 157-1 v. 8 9 Case No. 2:14-cv-01699-LDG-VCF RIMINI STREET, INC., and SETH RAVIN Counter Defendants. 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER 15 16 Pending before this Court is Plaintiff Rimini’s Unopposed Motion Regarding the 17 Confidentiality of Non-Public Rimini Client Names in Dkt. 157-1. Having considered Rimini’s 18 Motion: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 19 3. 20 The unredacted Exhibit 7 (Dkt. #157-1), attached to the Declaration of Ryan Dykal 21 (Dkt. #157) as an exhibit to the parties’ Joint Status Report (Dkt. #156), shall remain 22 under seal. 4. 23 No later than April 27, 2016, Oracle SHALL FILE A REDACTED VERSION OF 24 EXHIBIT 7, which obscures (1) the employee names on its FRCP 26(s) disclosures, 25 and (2) the five non-public Rimini client names identified in Exhibit A to the 26 Declaration of Nitin Jindal (Dkt. 205-1). Oracle shall also link these new filings in 27 28 /// /// 7526463 CM/ECF to the Joint Status Report (Dkt. #156) and the Declaration of Ryan Dykal (Dkt. #157). 1 Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 209-1 Filed 04/21/16 Page 2 of 2 1 CM/ECF to the Joint Status Report (Dkt. #156) and the Declaration of Ryan Dykal 2 (Dkt. #157). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: April 25, 2016 6 By:__________________________ Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7526463 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
