Beasley et al v. AAA Northern California, Nevada, Utah
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 15 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/14/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
JEREMY R. BEASLEY, et al.,
Plaintiff,
7
ORDER
(Motion to Amend Complaint – dkt. no. 15)
v.
8
9
Case No. 2:12-cv-01788-MMD-VCF
AAA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, NEVADA,
UTAH,
10
Defendant.
11
12
Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Amend/Correct the Complaint on January 7, 2013.
13
(Dkt. no. 15.) In accordance with Local Rule 15-1(a), Plaintiffs attached the proposed
14
Amended Complaint to their Motion. (Id.) The deadline to file a response to the Motion
15
was January 24, 2013. (Dkt. no. 15.) Defendant did not file a response to the Motion.
16
Failure to file points and authorities in opposition to a motion constitutes consent
17
that the motion be granted. L.R. 7-2(d); see Abbott v. United Venture Capital, Inc., 718
18
F. Supp. 828, 831 (D. Nev. 1989). The Court therefore GRANTS Plaintiffs’ unopposed
19
Motion.
20
Though Plaintiffs included the proposed Amended Complaint in their Motion, the
21
document is not a separately-filed entry, but part of the same document as the Motion.
22
Plaintiffs are therefore ORDERED to file the Amended Complaint as a separate docket
23
entry.
24
should delete any references to the Amended Complaint being a “proposed” document.
25
The Complaint should be entitled “First Amended Complaint,” and Plaintiffs
ENTERED THIS 14th day of February 2013.
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
