Baldwin v. United States of America

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 17 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice. The parties will bear their own costs and attorneys fees. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 02/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-01427-RCJ-PAL Document 17 1 4 NATHAN J. HOCHMAN Bingham McCutchen LLP The Water Garden 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 2050 North Santa Monica, CA 90404-4082 Telephone: (310) 255-9025 Email: nathan.hochman@bingham.com 5 Filed 02/27/13 Page 1 of 2 Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 ROBERT H. BALDWIN, Civil No. 2:12-cv-01427-RCJ-PAL Plaintiff, v. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 12 13 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of 14 Civil Procedure, by and between Plaintiff Robert H. Baldwin and Defendant the United States of 15 America, that the above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case 2:12-cv-01427-RCJ-PAL Document 17 1 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that the parties will bear their own costs and 2 attorneys’ fees. 3 DATED: February 27, 2013 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ Nathan J. Hochman NATHAN J. HOCHMAN Bingham McCutchen LLP The Water Garden 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 2050 North Santa Monica, CA 90404-4082 Attorney for Plaintiff KATHRYN KENEALLY Assistant Attorney General by: /s/ Adam R. Smart ADAM R. SMART Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0683 Attorney for the United States of America Of counsel: DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney 18 19 ORDER 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Filed 02/27/13 Page 2 of 2 DATED: This 27th day of February, 2013. 22 __________________________ ROBERT C. JONES Chief Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?