Vitale & Associates, LLC v. Lowden
Filing
11
ORDER Granting 10 Motion to Amend Complaint. Amended Complaint due within 14 days. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/6/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
VITALE & ASSOCIATES, LLC,
8
9
2:12-CV-1400 JCM (VCF)
Plaintiff(s),
10
v.
11
SUE LOWDEN, et al.,
12
Defendant(s).
13
14
ORDER
15
Presently before the court is plaintiff Vitale & Associates, LLC’s motion to amend complaint
16
to name Sue Lowden for U.S. Senate (the “campaign committee”) as a defendant. (Doc. #10).
17
Defendant Sue Lowden did not file an opposition.
18
I.
Background
19
On August 8, 2012, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant Lowden. (Doc. #1).
20
On December 6, 2012, defendant Lowden filed a certificate of interested parties, adding the
21
campaign committee as an interested party in this case. (Doc. # 9). Based on the certificate of
22
interested parties, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint adding the campaign committee
23
as a defendant. (Doc. #10).1
24
II.
25
Legal Standard
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 19(a) requires joinder where joinder “will not deprive
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
Plaintiff attached proposed amended complaint also adds additional causes of action not specified in the
motion. (Doc. #10-1).
1
the court of subject-matter jurisdiction” and where “that person claims an interest relating to the
2
subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person’s absence may . . .
3
leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise
4
inconsistent obligations because of the interest.” FED. R. CIV. P. 19(a).
5
III.
6
7
Discussion
As an initial matter, the court notes that plaintiff complied with local rule 15-1(a) and
attached its proposed amended complaint to the motion to amend.
8
In her certificate of interested parties, defendant Lowden asserts that the campaign committee
9
would owe any debt alleged in the complaint. (Doc. #9). Plaintiff argues that based on this assertion,
10
the campaign committee should be added as a defendant. (Doc. # 10).2 Because both parties have
11
acknowledged the campaign committee's interest in this action, the court grants plaintiff’s motion
12
to add the campaign committee as a defendant.3
13
Further, while plaintiff’s motion to amend (doc. #10) did not address the additional causes
14
of action alleged in the proposed amended complaint (doc. #10-1); defendant Lowden did not file
15
an opposition.4 Because defendant Lowden’s failure to respond constitutes consent to the granting
16
of the motion pursuant to local rule 7-2(d), the court also grants plaintiff’s motion on this basis.
17
...
18
...
19
...
20
...
21
...
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
2
However, plaintiff maintains its position that defendant Lowden is personally responsible for the debt owed.
(Doc. #10).
3
The court notes that amendment is permitted so long as amendment does not deprive the court of subject matter
jurisdiction. The proposed amended complaint does not assert the citizenship of the campaign committee; however, it
appears from the certificate of interested parties that the campaign committee is a nonprofit association under Nevada
law.
4
“The failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a
consent to the granting of the motion.” Local Rule 7-2(d).
-2-
1
IV.
Conclusion
2
Accordingly,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motion to
4
5
6
7
amend (doc. #10) be, and the same hereby, is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file and serve the amended complaint upon
defendants within fourteen (14) days of publication of this order.
DATED this 6th day of February, 2013.
8
9
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-3-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
