szabo v. United States of America
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 16 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/21/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
<![CDATA[
1 DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
2 District of Nevada
3 PATRICK A. ROSE
Assistant United States Attorney
4 Nevada Bar No. 5109
U.S. Attorney’s Office
5 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite5000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
6 Telephone: 702-388-6336
Facsimile: 702-388-6787
7 Email: patrick.rose@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12 DANIEL SZABO,
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
16
17
Defendants.
)
) Case No.: 2:12-cv-00676-GMN-PAL
)
)
)
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER
) TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
Plaintiff, Daniel Szabo, (“Plaintiff” or “Szabo”) and Defendant, the United States of America,
21 (“Defendant” or the “United States”), through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and request that this
22 . . .
23 . . .
24 . . .
25 . . .
26 . . .
1 action be dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs.
2
Respectfully submitted this 19th day of February, 2013.
3
4
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM
//S/ Patrick A. Rose
PATRICK A. ROSE
Assistant United States Attorney
333 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 5000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Phone: (702) 388-6336
patrick.rose@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States
Lawrence M. Ruiz _________________
LAWRENCE M. RUIZ, ESQ
801 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Phone: (702) 444-4444
lawrence@richardharrislaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
16
17
_____________________________
UNITED STATES
Gloria M. Navarro DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Judge
DATED:
DATED: 02/21/2013
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
