The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Riverwalk Development, LLC et al, No. 2:2011cv02033 - Document 89 (D. Nev. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the Clerk of Court shall enter final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and against Defendant National Fire & Marine Insurance Company on Co unt One of the Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. The Clerk of Court further shall enter final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and against Defendant National Fire & Marine Insurance Company on Count Two of the Complaint for Declaratory Judgment only to the extent Count Two seeks a declaration that there are multiple occurrences alleged in the underlying case. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Riverwalk Development, LLC et al Doc. 89 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 *** ) THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE ) STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NATIONAL FIRE & MARINE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 2:11-CV-02033-PMP-NJK ORDER Having read and considered the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal without Prejudice and Entry of Final Judgment (Doc. #87), and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the 16 Clerk of Court shall enter final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff The Insurance Company of 17 the State of Pennsylvania and against Defendant National Fire & Marine Insurance 18 Company on Count One of the Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. The Clerk of Court 19 further shall enter final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff The Insurance Company of the State 20 of Pennsylvania and against Defendant National Fire & Marine Insurance Company on 21 Count Two of the Complaint for Declaratory Judgment only to the extent Count Two seeks 22 a declaration that there are multiple occurrences alleged in the underlying case. There is no 23 just reason for delay in entering Judgment as to these claims. 24 25 26 DATED: September 13, 2013 _______________________________ PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.