-VCF United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ruettiger et al, No. 2:2011cv02011 - Document 19 (D. Nev. 2012)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of United States Securities and Exchange Commission against Mehmet Mustafoglu. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF

-VCF United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ruettiger et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA – LAS VEGAS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Case No. 2:11-cv-02011-GMN-VCF Plaintiff, _____________________ v. DANIEL E. RUETTIGER, ET AL., Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MEHMET MUSTAFOGLU The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint (“the Complaint”) and Defendant Mehmet Mustafoglu having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any Dockets.Justia.com means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently barred from participating in an offering of penny stock, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock. A penny stock is any equity security that has a price of less than five dollars, except as provided in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act [17 C.F.R. 240.3a51-1]. III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 2 is liable for disgorgement of $363,603, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $31,765, for a total of $395,368. Defendant is also liable for a civil penalty in the amount of $40,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)]. Defendant shall satisfy these obligations to pay disgorgement and a civil penalty by paying $435,368 within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment by certified check, bank cashier's check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The payment shall be delivered or mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Stop 6042, Washington DC 20549, and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying Mehmet Mustafoglu as a defendant in this action; setting forth the title and civil action number of this action and the name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 USC § 1961. The Commission shall remit the funds paid pursuant to this paragraph to the United States Treasury. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. V. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. 3 VI. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. DATED this 19th day of January, 2012. Dated: ______________ ________________________________ ____________________________________ UNITEDGloria M.DISTRICT JUDGE STATES Navarro United States District Judge 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.