Elliott v. Target Corporation, et al
Filing
40
ORDER that 33 , 34 , 35 and 36 Defendant's Motions in Limine are DENIED as moot. The parties may refile their motions closer in time to the new trial date. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/4/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
2:11-CV-1215 JCM (NJK)
MARSHA ELLIOTT,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
TARGET CORPORATION,
12
Defendant(s).
13
14
15
16
ORDER
Presently before the court is the matter of Elliott v. Target Corporation et al, case number
2:11-cv-01215-JCM-NJK.
17
Defendant filed four motions in limine. (Docs. ## 33-36). Plaintiff never filed responses.
18
Before the responses were due the parties stipulated to continue the trial date until May 2013. The
19
motions in limine are mooted. The parties may refile any motions in limine as the new trial date
20
approaches.
21
Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant’s motions in
23
limine (docs. ## 33-36) be, and the same hereby, are DENIED as moot. The parties may refile their
24
motions closer in time to the new trial date.
25
DATED February 4, 2013.
26
27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
