Buchanan v. Raschke et al
Filing
100
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 98 Stipulation to Dismiss City Defendants with prejudice. Court's Order 96 remains and shall not be affected by this Order. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/27/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BRADFORD R. JERBIC
City Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 1056
By: DAVID E.I]AILEY
Deputy City Attorncy
Nevada Bar No. 8955
495 S. Main Strect, Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702)22e-662e
(702)386-174e (läx)
Email : debailey@lasvcgasnevada.gov
Attorneys for Defendants City of Las Vegas,
Benjamin Nadig, and Edward Poleski
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NBVADA
10
JAMES JEFFREY I}UCHANAN,
11
t2
13
14
15
16
T7
Plaintill,
CASE NO.
2: 1
l-cv -0027 I -MMD-(GWF)
VS.
LAS VEGAS METIìOPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a Political Subdivision of thc
STATE OF NEVADA;OFFICER SANDY
RASCHKE, individually and as a police ofïicer
employed by thc LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN
POLICE DEPARTMENT;THE CITY OF LAS
VEGAS, I]ENJAMIN NADIG, ESQ., CHARLOTTE
BIBLE, ESQ., EDWAIìD POLESKI, ROE
CORPORATIONS ancl/or GOVERNMENTAL
ENTITIES, and JOHN DOES I-X, inclusivc,
18
Dcfbndants.
l9
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CII'Y DBFBNDANTS
21
COME NOW Dslbndants CITY OF LAS VEGAS, I-]ENJAMIN NADIG, ancl EI)WAlìl)
22
POLESKI (collcctivcly rcl'orrcd to hcrcinaftcr as "City Defendants"), by ancl through thcir altorrìoys,
23
IIRADFORD R. JEIìlllC, City Arrorncy, by DAVID E. IIAILEY, Dcputy City Attorncy; antl Plaintil'l',
24
JAMES JEFFREY IIUCHANAN,
25
abovc-captionecl action bc dismissed with prejudico as it pcrtains to cach of PlaintifTs clainrs and/or catrses
26
of action against City Dcl'cndants, with cach party to bsar thoir own attorney fbos a¡ld costs; but that
Las Vegas City Attorn€y
495 S. Main Street, 6th Floor
Las Vegas, N€vada 8910
1
in
propor porson, and hcrcby agrco ancl stipulatc that
thc
thc
1
Court's Order dated February 'J.5,20t3, in the above-captioned action concerning an award of attorney lbcs
2
in favor of City Defendants (Docket #96) remains and shall not be affected by this Stipulation and Ordcr.
DATED
J
4
this >laay
of Februa ry,2013.
BRADFORD R. JERBIC
City Attorney
5
6
By:
EY I]UCHANAN
W. Sahara Avcnuc, #1.104
Vegas, NV 89117
DAVID E. BAILEY
Deputy City Attorney
7
Nevada Bar No. 8955
495 S. Main Street, Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys f.or City Deþndants
8
9
j
effbuch
an an
lv 1 980@hot ma i l.co m
In Proper Person
10
ORDER
11
Based upon the foregoing Stipulation of the parties, each of
Plaintiff s clai¡ns and
causes of actions
L2
against each of Defendants CITY OF LAS VEGAS, BENJAMIN NADIG, and ED'WARD POLESKI in thc
13
above-captioned action are dismissed with prcjudice, with each party to bear thcir own costs an<l att<lrneys
T4
fees; but the Court's Order dated February I 5, 20 I 3, in the above-captioncd action concorning an awarcl ol'
15
attorney fees in favor of City Defendants (Dockct #96) remains and shall not bc afl'octod by this Order.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1.7
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
t9
DATED:
20
SUI]MITTED BY:
21.
BRADFORD R. JERBIC
City Attorney
22
By:
23
24
25
"ù
DAVID E. BAILEY
Dcputy City Attorney
Ncvada Bar No. 8955
495 S. Main Street, Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for City Deþndants
26
Lås Vegas C¡ty Attorney
495 S. Main Streot,6th Floor
Las Vegas, N€vada 89101
-2-
February 27, 2013
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
