Robinson v. Murry et al
Filing
4
ORDER Affirming 3 Report and Recommendation. Order dismissing 1 Complaint without prejudice. Clerk to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AXM)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA -oOoJAMES ROBINSON, Plaintiff, vs. ANTHONY MURRY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 :09-CV-00818-PMP-PAL ORDER
Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff James Robinson's Complaint (Doc. #1), filed on May 7, 2009. On March 17, 2010, the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, entered a Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #3) recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1) be denied. Plaintiff Robinson was given notice to file a written objection with the court to Magistrate Judge Leen's Report and Recommendations within ten (10) days after being served. To date no objections have been filed and the time to do so has now expired. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 3-2(a) and determines that Magistrate Judge Leen's Report of Findings and Recommendation should be Affirmed. ///
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen's Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #3) is Affirmed and Plaintiff James Robinson's Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. DATED: April 5, 2010.
PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
