McKinley v. Omaha Police Department, No. 8:2009cv00222 - Document 10 (D. Neb. 2009)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION - This matter is before the Court on its own motion. The plaintiff was given an extension of time to file an amended complaint 9 . No amended complaint has been filed. A separate order will be entered dismissing plaintiff's complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ) Modified on 11/2/2009 to edit text (KBJ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SHANE MATTHEW McKINLEY, Plaintiff, v. OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:09CV222 MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its own motion. On August 14, 2009, the Court conducted an initial review of plaintiff s complaint and found that it failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted (Filing No. 7). The Court gave plaintiff the opportunity to amend his claims, but warned him that if he failed to amend his complaint by September 14, 2009, his complaint will be dismissed without further notice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. at CM/ECF p. 5.) (Id. Plaintiff thereafter requested, and was given, an extension of time until October 14, 2009, to file an amended complaint (Filing Nos. 8 and 9 (text order)), but no amended complaint has been filed. A separate order will be entered dismissing plaintiff s complaint. DATED this 2nd day of November, 2009. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.