Universal Dynamics, Inc. v. H-P Products, Inc. et al, No. 8:2008cv00391 - Document 167 (D. Neb. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT - The parties' Stipulations for Dismissal 158 , 159 , 162 , 164 , 165 , 166 are approved. All claims asserted by Plaintiff Universal Dynamics, Inc. against Defendants H-P Products, Inc. and Dan Gaylord d/b/a Independence Porcelain Enamel, are dismissed with prejudice; and The parties will pay their own costs and attorney fees, complete record waived. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (KBJ)

Download PDF
Universal Dynamics, Inc. v. H-P Products, Inc. et al Doc. 167 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNIVERSAL DYNAMICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. H-P PRODUCTS, INC. and DAN GAYLORD d/b/a INDEPENDENCE PORCELAIN ENAMEL, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:08CV391 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court on the parties’ stipulations for dismissal (Filing Nos. 158, 159, 162, 164, 165, and 166). The stipulations comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the Court concludes that they should be approved. The parties will bear their own costs and attorney fees, complete record waived. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties’ Stipulations for Dismissal (Filing Nos. 158, 159, 162, 164, 165 and 166) are approved; 2. All claims asserted by Plaintiff Universal Dynamics, Inc. against Defendants H-P Products, Inc. and Dan Gaylord d/b/a Independence Porcelain Enamel, are dismissed with prejudice; and 3. The parties will pay their own costs and attorney fees, complete record waived. DATED this 4th day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.