Silversky et al v. Ferriter et al, No. 4:2011cv00017 - Document 10 (D. Mont. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 in full. Plaintiffs' Complaint 2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/21/2011. Mailed to Silversky and Wilcock. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Silversky et al v. Ferriter et al Doc. 10 FI LEO 2011 BE? 21 PrJ 23 lj "'CICY , v :\1\ rLEP'; T , ! : ' ; :' " \ L ,"i J ' . J j 0"' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION JONATHAN SILVERSKY and ERNEST WILCOCK, No. CV 1117GFSEH Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER MIKE FERRITER, et ai., Defendants. On August 30, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendations! in this matter. Plaintiffs did not file objections. No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas y. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 149152 (1986). However, this 1 Docket No.9. 1- Dockets.Justia.com Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations for clear error. Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs' Complainf is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Any appeal would be taken in bad faith due to the frivolous nature of the issues raised. 3 The Clerk of DATED this is directed to enter judgment accordingly. / .§.- of September, 2011. day 2 Docket No.2. -2- United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
