Hall v. Law et al, No. 4:2011cv00007 - Document 9 (D. Mont. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. The 8 Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 2/28/2011. Mailed to Hall. (TAG, )

Download PDF
Hall v. Law et al Doc. 9 FILED GREH F' •. 2011 FEB 28 P(IJ 3 56 PATRICK E. DUFFY, CLERK By _ _ _ _ _ _- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DE?UTY CLERK FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION No, CV-II-07-GF-SEH STACY GENE HALL, Petitioner, ORDER VS. WARDEN SAM LAW; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent On January 26, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations in this matter.! Petitioner filed objections to Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations on February 16,2011. He also tIled a Motion for Certificate of Appealability. The Court has fully considered Petitioner's motion and has reviewed de novo Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 Document No.4 Dockets.Justia.com Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus2 is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. The Motion for Certificate of AppealabilitY is DENIED as the Petition fails to allege a viable claim for federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 3. The Clerk is DATED this J 6 to enter judgment accordingly. of February, 2011. nited States District Judge 2 Document No. I 3 Document No. g -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.