LaCoss v. Astrue, No. 4:2010cv00063 - Document 27 (D. Mont. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Sumamary Judgment is GRANTED; 2) Defendant's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 3) This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for an award of benefits. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/19/2011. (SLR, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LaCoss v. Astrue Doc. 27 /-f' FI '.~ '- ,) GF\[;\T~,' LD 2011 GEP 19 PrJ 3 10 BY _ _ DEPUTY CLERK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION RONALD LA COSS, Plaintiff, CV 10-63-GF-SEH vs. ORDER MICHAEL J. ASTURE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. On August 30, 2011, United States Magistrate Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendations 1 in this matter. No objections were filed. No review is required ofproposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas y. Am, 474 U.S. 140,149-152 (1986). However, this • Docket No. 26. Dockets.Justia.com Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations for clear error. I see no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations. Therefore, I adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment2 is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgmene is DENIED. 3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for ;t!L an award of benefits. DATED this 2 If day of September, 2011. Docket No. 13. ) Docket No. 21. -2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
