Hamilton v. Law et al, No. 4:2010cv00038 - Document 15 (D. Mont. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 in full. Plaintiff's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 11/4/2010. Mailed to Hamilton at MSP. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hamilton v. Law et al Doc. 15 lj f1f1l 10 S9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .\ . ;:1 FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION DARRYL HAMIL TON, Petitioner, No. CV-10-38-GF-SEH vs. ORDER SAM LA W; MIKE FERRITER; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONT ANA, Respondents. On July 27,2010, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendation l in this matter. Plaintiff filed objections2 to Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation on November 2, 2010. The Court has fully considered Plaintiff's motion and has reviewed de novo Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and I Document No.7 2 Document No. 14 Dockets.Justia.com Recommendation and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus3 is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED because Plaintiff was not denied his Sixth Amendment right to counseL 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. DATED this of November, 2010. 3 Document No. 1 2 United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
